Latvia - 1. LigaRīgas 49. vidusskolas sporta komplekssData current as of September 06, 2026

JDFS Alberts vs Tukums II: match statistics

JDFS Alberts crest
JDFS Alberts
6 : 1half-time 2:0
Tukums II crest
Tukums II

JDFS Alberts vs Tukums II: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

JDFS Alberts played against Tukums II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on May 31, 2026. Venue: Rīgas 49. vidusskolas sporta komplekss. Final score: 6:1.

Recent form

JDFS Alberts has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Tukums II has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

JDFS Alberts scores 1.88 goals per game and allows 1.63. Tukums II scores 1.63 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 3.39 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 88% of JDFS Alberts's games and 88% of Tukums II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 75%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 69% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

JDFS Alberts has the higher season xG average, 1.70 to 1.40 per game. JDFS Alberts takes 12.9 shots per game, while Tukums II takes 8.5.

First-half and second-half trends

JDFS Alberts leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 1.13 goals per game after halftime. Tukums II leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.88 after halftime.

When the teams score

JDFS Alberts's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (4 goals). For Tukums II, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

1. Liga games average 3.39 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 69% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

JDFS Alberts holds a clear advantage in key home metrics: at home they average 2.67 goals per match with 14.33 shots and 6.67 on target, maintain 59% possession and concede only 0.67 goals per match. Tukums II away average 2.33 goals with 8 shots and 3.5 on target, but concede as many as 2.33 goals per match and have recorded 0 clean sheets (0% clean sheets). The quality-of-chances differential is confirmed by xG: hosts have home xG 1.92 versus visitors' away xG 1.24, with xG against 1.57 vs 1.43, suggesting JDFS’ superiority in creating better opportunities and limiting the opponent. Recent form over the last five matches also favors the hosts — JDFS scored 14 goals in the last 5 and hold a 3-1-1 record (2.0 points per match), while Tukums have 9 goals and a 2-1-2 record with 1.4 points per match. Given the defensive edge (0.67 vs 2.33 goals conceded), higher shot volume (14.33 vs 8) and greater possession (59% vs 46%), I predict a JDFS Alberts victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams strongly favor a BTTS scenario: seasonal BTTS is 80% for JDFS Alberts and 100% for Tukums II, with both at 80% in their last 5 matches. Tukums II averages 2.33 goals scored and 2.33 conceded per game; JDFS has seasonal 1.20 scored and 1.80 conceded, but in the last 5 matches JDFS raised their average to 2.8 scored vs 1.6 conceded. xG also points to a goal-heavy match: seasonal attacking xG is 1.47 for JDFS and 1.24 for Tukums, while xG against are 1.8 and 1.43, supporting an exchange of chances. Tukums has no clean sheets this season (0%), JDFS only 20% clean sheets, and the league average is 3.39 goals per match, which further increases BTTS likelihood. Based on this, I estimate BTTS - Yes probability at ~88% and No at 12%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG model estimates about 1.45 expected goals for JDFS Alberts (1.47 xG for vs 1.43 xG against Tukums II) and 1.52 for Tukums II (1.24 xG for vs 1.80 xG against JDFS Alberts), totaling ~2.97 goals. Both teams have 100% of season matches over 1.5 goals (seasonOver15Percentage_home=100%, seasonOver15Percentage_away=100%) and BTTS rates of 80% and 100% respectively, which strongly supports at least two goals in the match. The home side averages 10.6 shots with 5.2 on target, the visitors 8.0 with 3.5 on target, and shot conversion is 11% vs 19% in favor of the visitors, increasing the likelihood of chances turning into goals. In the last 5 matches JDFS Alberts averaged 2.8 goals, Tukums II 1.8 goals, and the league average is 3.39 goals per game, so Over 2.5 is also realistic; I do not consider the 3.5 threshold certain since the expected 2.97 goals is below that line. Based on this, I recommend playing Over 1.5 as the strongest and most reliable signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is the away team leading at half-time and winning the match (2/2) — I assess this at 39%. Key figures: the away side average 1.33 goals by the break versus the home side’s 0.4, and the home team have been behind at half-time in 60% of matches, which strongly supports HT=2. Over the full 90 minutes the away team average 2.33 goals scored and 2.33 conceded, while the home team average 1.2 scored and 1.8 conceded, so the away side holding their lead is probable. Although the hosts have a higher xG (1.47 vs 1.24), the away team are more efficient in finishing (shot conversion 19% vs 11%), and given the high incidence of both teams scoring (BTTS: 80% for the home team and 100% for the away team) I also allow for X/2 scenarios (12%) and 2/X turnarounds (15%). Additionally, the home team are losing 60% of their matches this season, which further increases the likelihood of an away win at full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
4 : 1
Second half

Game stats

52Possession (%)48
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
31Shots10
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
27Shots on target7
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
4.27xG1.41
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
9Corners3
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
61Dangerous attacks39
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
-1Fouls-1
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
-1Cards-1
JDFS AlbertsTukums II

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

JDFS AlbertsTukums II
1.88Goals scored / game1.63
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
1.63Goals allowed / game2
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
54%Average possession40%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
4.88Shots on target / game4
JDFS AlbertsTukums II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.88Shots per game8.5
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
4.88Shots on target4
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
14.6%Shot conversion19.1%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
54%Possession40%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
1.7xG for1.4
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
1.31xG against1.7
JDFS AlbertsTukums II

Shooting quality

JDFS Alberts: Efficient finishingTukums II: Counter-attacking
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
Accuracy (shots on target)38%47%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

JDFS Alberts is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - JDFS Alberts · 1.4 pts / game - Tukums II

JDFS Alberts
WWDLW
Season result split
50% W13% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-3
1.63 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-0
Last 5 at home
3-0-0
WWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.73Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Tukums II
WLLWD
Season result split
25% W25% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-4
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 away
1-1-1
DLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

JDFS Alberts is 15% better for: goals scored per game.

1.88 goals / game - JDFS Alberts · 1.63 goals / game - Tukums II

JDFS Alberts is 23% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.63 goals / game - JDFS Alberts · 2 goals / game - Tukums II

JDFS Alberts scoring profile: very strong

JDFS Alberts scores in 100% of games (8 of 8 meczów), while Tukums II keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 meczów).

Tukums II scoring profile: very strong

Tukums II scores in 100% of games (8 of 8 meczów), while JDFS Alberts keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 meczów).

15Goals scored (season)13
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
13Goals conceded (season)16
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
3.5Average goals per game3.63
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
11Goals scored (last 5)9
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
9Goals conceded (last 5)8
JDFS AlbertsTukums II

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
50%2 goals38%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
25%3 goals13%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
13%4 goals13%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal88%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
50%2 goals63%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
13%3 goals38%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
13%4 goals13%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time50%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
0%BTTS in both halves0%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
13%Scored in both halves25%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II

BTTS and goal count

75%Min. 3 goals and BTTS75%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
100%BTTS - last 580%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time88%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time63%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
38%Min. 3 goals before half-time38%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
75%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

JDFS Alberts is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / game - JDFS Alberts · 1 pts / game - Tukums II

JDFS Alberts - half-time state
25% leading38% draw38% trailing
Tukums II - half-time state
25% leading25% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per game (1st half)1
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.75
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
0.88Goals conceded (1st half)1.13
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
1.63Average goals (1st half)1.88
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
50%Clean sheet before half-time25%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
63%No goal before half-time38%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.63Points per game (2nd half)1.25
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
1.13Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
1.88Average goals (2nd half)1.75
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
25%Clean sheet after half-time38%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II
25%No goal after half-time38%
JDFS AlbertsTukums II

JDFS Alberts - second-half results

38% W50% R13% P
9
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Tukums II - second-half results

38% W13% R50% P
8
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

JDFS Alberts - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.60
Goals scored / game1.01.2
Goals allowed / game0.81.0
Average goals per game1.82.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Tukums II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.002.00
Goals scored / game0.61.2
Goals allowed / game1.00.6
Average goals per game1.61.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-2+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

JDFS Alberts
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
2
3
16-30
2
3
31-45
1
4
46-60
4
2
61-75
4
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Tukums II
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
3
4
31-45
2
2
46-60
0
3
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.57
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.9 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
88%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+40%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

JDFS Alberts

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Tukums II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

JDFS AlbertsLigaTukums II
Average goals per game 3.503.39 3.63
Both teams scored 88%62% 88%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%69% 75%
Clean sheets 13%22% 13%
Goal before half-time 63%67% 88%
Goal after half-time 88%84% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.39
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.87
Home goals / game
1.52
Away goals / game
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defensive advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
62%
2 goals
38%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Dāvis Indrāns⚽ 1
Markus Prohorenkovs⚽ 3

Away team

Other recorded players

Ilja Atligins⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JDFS AlbertsGoalMarkus Prohorenkovs
  2. JDFS AlbertsGoalMarkus Prohorenkovs
  3. Tukums IIGoalIlja Atligins
  4. JDFS AlbertsGoalDāvis Indrāns
  5. JDFS AlbertsGoalMarkus Prohorenkovs

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from JDFS Alberts's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Tukums II. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

JDFS Alberts
4 : 3
FK Tukums 2000 / TSS II
FK Tukums 2000 / TSS II
1 : 2
JDFS Alberts

FAQ

What was the result of JDFS Alberts vs Tukums II?

The 1. Liga match finished JDFS Alberts 6:1 Tukums II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between JDFS Alberts and Tukums II?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches JDFS Alberts won 2, Tukums II won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before JDFS Alberts vs Tukums II?

JDFS Alberts score 1.88 goals per game on average and Tukums II 1.63. The 1. Liga average is 3.39 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 88% of JDFS Alberts's matches and 88% of Tukums II's.

What form are JDFS Alberts and Tukums II in?

Over the last 5 games JDFS Alberts have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Tukums II 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JDFS Alberts vs Tukums II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.