Jeju United vs Sangju Sangmu: match statistics
Jeju United vs Sangju Sangmu: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Jeju United played against Sangju Sangmu in K League 1 (South Korea). The game was played on August 22, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Jeju United has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. Sangju Sangmu has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Jeju United scores 1.17 goals per game and allows 1.04. Sangju Sangmu scores 1.00 and allows 1.26. Games in this league average 2.41 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 57% of Jeju United's games and 65% of Sangju Sangmu's. The Over 2.5 rates are 39% and 30%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 42% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Jeju United has the higher season xG average, 1.51 to 1.48 per game. Jeju United takes 12.8 shots per game, while Sangju Sangmu takes 12.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Jeju United leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.65 goals per game after halftime. Sangju Sangmu leads at halftime in 22% and scores 0.61 after halftime.
When the teams score
Jeju United's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For Sangju Sangmu, it is minutes 61-75 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 1 games average 2.41 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 42% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 3 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Jeju United have home advantage, but they win just 31% of their home matches and draw as many as 38%, averaging 1.08 goals scored and 1.15 conceded. Sangju Sangmu also average 1.08 goals away from home, while half of their away matches have ended in draws, strongly supporting a potential share of the points. The hosts create more quality chances, recording an xG of 1.60 compared with 1.32 for their opponents, as well as 4.54 shots on target per match versus Sangju’s 3.42. However, they have failed to convert this superiority into a high scoring efficiency, finding the net with just 8% of their attempts. The visitors are enjoying an excellent unbeaten run: in their last five matches, they have recorded 3 wins and 2 draws, conceding just 4 goals, while Jeju have conceded 9 during the same period. Sangju’s superior current form offsets Jeju’s advantage in chance creation, making a draw the most likely outcome, probably in a low-scoring match.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for both teams to score is clear, as Jeju United have recorded BTTS in 73% of matches and Sangju Sangmu in 58%, compared with the league average of 53%. Over their last five matches, these figures increased to 80% and 60%, respectively, while Jeju scored an average of 2.4 goals and conceded 1.8. The hosts kept a clean sheet in only 9% of matches and allowed opponents an xG of 2.12 across their last five games, strongly supporting a goal for the visitors. Sangju are more defensively stable, averaging 0.8 goals conceded in their last five appearances and recording 25% clean sheets this season, but Jeju create plenty of chances: they average 13.73 shots and have a seasonal xG of 1.61. The most likely scenario therefore remains one in which both teams score at least one goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal points to Under 3.5 goals: this scenario occurred in 91% of Jeju United matches and 83% of Sangju Sangmu fixtures. Across the entire season, only 9% of the hosts’ matches and 17% of the visitors’ matches exceeded the 3.5-goal line, while Over 2.5 goals landed in just 36% and 25% of cases, respectively. The 2.50-goal forecast factors in decent xG figures of 1.61 for Jeju and 1.32 for Sangju, but also the hosts’ low scoring efficiency of 7%. Jeju’s last five matches were clearly more open, averaging 4.2 goals with 80% finishing Over 2.5, but Sangju conceded just 0.8 goals per game during this period. This limits the chances of a very high-scoring game, giving Under 3.5 a clear edge.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most logical starting point, as Jeju were level at the break in 55% of their matches and Sangju Sangmu in 50%; both teams average only 0.36 and 0.42 goals per game respectively before half-time. Sangju Sangmu clearly improve after the interval, averaging 1.58 points in second halves compared with Jeju’s 0.73, and they also have a positive goal difference of +2 against the hosts’ -3. The visitors are also unbeaten in their last five matches, with a record of 3 wins and 2 draws, while Jeju conceded an average of 1.8 goals per game during this period. Although Jeju scored as many as 2.4 goals per game over their last five league matches, Sangju Sangmu allowed opponents just 0.8 goals, reinforcing the scenario of a tight first half and a visitors’ advantage after the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Jeju United | Sangju Sangmu | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Jeju United is 22% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / game - Jeju United · 1.8 pts / game - Sangju Sangmu
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Jeju United is 17% better for: goals scored per game.
1.17 goals / game - Jeju United · 1 goals / game - Sangju Sangmu
Jeju United is 21% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.04 goals / game - Jeju United · 1.26 goals / game - Sangju Sangmu
Jeju United scores in 78% of games (18 of 23 meczów), while Sangju Sangmu keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 meczów).
Sangju Sangmu scores in 74% of games (17 of 23 meczów), while Jeju United keeps a clean sheet in 30% (7 of 23 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Jeju United
Over / Under - Sangju Sangmu
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Jeju United is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.39 pts / game - Jeju United · 1.17 pts / game - Sangju Sangmu
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Jeju United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 39%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Sangju Sangmu - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 17%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 0% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Jeju United
Sangju Sangmu
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).
Teams vs league
| Jeju United | Liga | Sangju Sangmu | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.22 | 2.41 | ▼ 2.26 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 57% | 53% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 39% | 42% | ▼ 30% |
| Clean sheets | • 30% | 29% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | • 65% | 64% | ▼ 61% |
| Goal after half-time | • 74% | 75% | ▲ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Jeju United's perspective: 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses against Sangju Sangmu. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Jeju United vs Sangju Sangmu?
The K League 1 match finished Jeju United 0:0 Sangju Sangmu. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Jeju United and Sangju Sangmu?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Jeju United won 0, Sangju Sangmu won 2 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Jeju United vs Sangju Sangmu?
Jeju United score 1.17 goals per game on average and Sangju Sangmu 1.00. The K League 1 average is 2.41 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Jeju United's matches and 65% of Sangju Sangmu's.
What form are Jeju United and Sangju Sangmu in?
Over the last 5 games Jeju United have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Sangju Sangmu 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Jeju United vs Sangju Sangmu?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Jeju United vs Sangju Sangmu: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.