Jesenice vs Beltinci: match statistics
Jesenice vs Beltinci: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Jesenice played against Beltinci in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The game was played on April 18, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Jesenice has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Beltinci has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Jesenice scores 0.91 goals per game and allows 2.13. Beltinci scores 1.78 and allows 0.83. Games in this league average 2.77 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of Jesenice's games and 48% of Beltinci's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 52%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Beltinci has the higher season xG average, 1.80 to 1.21 per game. Jesenice takes 9.0 shots per game, while Beltinci takes 14.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Jesenice leads at halftime in 13% of its games and scores 0.57 goals per game after halftime. Beltinci leads at halftime in 52% and scores 0.87 after halftime.
When the teams score
Jesenice's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Beltinci, it is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
2. SNL games average 2.77 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 6.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an away win (2). Beltinci win 73% of their away matches, average 1.55 goals scored and concede only 0.55 per game, and keep a clean sheet in 64% of away fixtures. Jesenice sit 15th with just 3 wins this season, average 2.09 goals conceded at home while scoring only 1.00, and have a home goal difference of -12. The quality gap is supported by xG (1.64 for Beltinci vs 1.34 for Jesenice) and superior shot efficiency (12% vs 9%); in the last 5 matches the visitors have scored 7 goals and are averaging 1.8 points per game versus the hosts' 0.4. Considering the defenses (0.55 vs 2.09 conceded), the clear goal difference (+11 vs -12) and the advantage in efficiency, I assess the probabilities as: home 12%, draw 18%, away 70%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict a BTTS - Yes scenario because both teams generate significant expected goals: Jesenice has home xG 1.94 while Beltinci concedes 1.11 xG; conversely Beltinci posts away xG 1.64 and Jesenice concedes 1.12 xG. Jesenice record 67% BTTS this season and average 2.0 goals scored at home with 1.08 conceded, which supports a Goal/Goal outcome; by contrast Beltinci show only 27% BTTS seasonally and 64% matches with a clean sheet expected, which argues against BTTS. However, the last 5 matches indicate a form shift: Beltinci have 80% BTTS in the last 5, averaging 1.4 goals scored and 1.0 conceded in that period, while Jesenice in their last 5 averaged 0.6 scored and 2.0 conceded, increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. Additionally, chance metrics (Jesenice ~15.33 shots and 5.58 on target vs Beltinci ~12.45 and 5.18) and conversion rates of ~13% and 12% suggest scoring opportunities will be created. In summary, based on strong xG signals and recent form I assign BTTS 65% (Yes) vs 35% (No).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG: the home side has an attacking xG of 1.94 while the away defense concedes 1.11 xG on average, yielding the home team ≈1.53 expected goals; the visitors have attacking xG of 1.64 against a home defense conceding 1.12, expected goals for the away team ≈1.38, total ≈2.91. A Poisson model for a total of 2.91 gives probability Over 1.5 ≈78.7% (rounded to 79%), Over 2.5 ≈55.6% (56%) and Over 3.5 ≈33.3% (33%). Season metrics reinforce this picture: homes exceeded 1.5 in 83% of matches versus 55% for away teams; for 2.5 homes 67% vs away 36%, which particularly supports Over 1.5 and moderately supports Over 2.5. Additionally, homes average 15.33 shots with 5.58 on target and a 13% conversion, while visitors average 12.45 shots with 5.18 on target and a 12% conversion; the share of matches with both teams scoring is 67% for homes and 27% for away. In summary, the strongest signal from the data is the Over 1.5 line (recommendation: over 1.5), as the model and the season 83% for homes indicate a high probability of at least 2 goals (~79%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seasonal statistics favor the visitors: Beltinci have a 73% win rate this season versus Jesenice’s 42% and average 2.36 points per game compared to the home side’s 1.58. Beltinci lead at the break in 64% of their matches, and their average goals conceded before half-time is only 0.09 versus 0.67 for Jesenice, which strongly supports the visitors leading after 45 minutes. Over the full-time period the visitors also dominate statistically (73% wins and form in the last 5: W D D W D), while the hosts have 0% wins in their last 5 (L D D L L), so a Beltinci victory is more likely. Although the home side have a higher home xG (xG 1.94 versus the visitors’ 1.64) and score on average 1.0 goal after the break, their high share of home matches with both teams scoring (67%) only gives a limited chance of a turnaround. Therefore the strongest signal from the data is the visitors leading at half-time and winning the match (2/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Jesenice | Beltinci | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Beltinci is 350% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - Jesenice · 1.8 pts / game - Beltinci
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Beltinci is 96% better for: goals scored per game.
0.91 goals / game - Jesenice · 1.78 goals / game - Beltinci
Beltinci is 157% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.13 goals / game - Jesenice · 0.83 goals / game - Beltinci
Jesenice scores in 57% of games (13 of 23 meczów), while Beltinci keeps a clean sheet in 48% (11 of 23 meczów).
Beltinci scores in 83% of games (19 of 23 meczów), while Jesenice keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Jesenice
Over / Under - Beltinci
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Beltinci is 120% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.83 pts / game - Jesenice · 1.83 pts / game - Beltinci
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Jesenice - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 13%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Beltinci - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 52% of games and wins 57%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Jesenice
Beltinci
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Jesenice | Liga | Beltinci | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.04 | 2.77 | ▼ 2.61 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 49% | • 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 53% | • 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 29% | ▲ 48% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 73% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 80% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- BeltinciGoalHristijan Georgievski
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Jesenice's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Beltinci. Games average 6.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Jesenice vs Beltinci?
The 2. SNL match finished Jesenice 0:2 Beltinci. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Jesenice vs Beltinci?
Jesenice score 0.91 goals per game on average and Beltinci 1.78. The 2. SNL average is 2.77 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Jesenice's matches and 48% of Beltinci's.
What form are Jesenice and Beltinci in?
Over the last 5 games Jesenice have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Beltinci 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Jesenice vs Beltinci?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.