Slovenia - 2. SNLData current as of September 13, 2026

Jesenice vs Nafta: match statistics

Jesenice crest
Jesenice
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Nafta crest
Nafta

Jesenice vs Nafta: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Jesenice played against Nafta in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The game was played on April 4, 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Recent form

Jesenice has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Nafta has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Jesenice scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 2.14. Nafta scores 2.33 and allows 0.86. Games in this league average 2.83 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 48% of Jesenice's games and 67% of Nafta's. The Over 2.5 rates are 62% and 48%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Nafta has the higher season xG average, 1.70 to 1.23 per game. Jesenice takes 9.2 shots per game, while Nafta takes 13.2.

First-half and second-half trends

Jesenice leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.62 goals per game after halftime. Nafta leads at halftime in 62% and scores 1.33 after halftime.

When the teams score

Jesenice's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Nafta, it is minutes 61-75 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

2. SNL games average 2.83 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 6.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict an away win — Nafta. Nafta has 16 wins, 5 draws and 0 losses this season, while Jesenice has only 3 wins, 6 draws and 12 losses; goal difference is 49 scored by Nafta versus 21 for Jesenice. Away, Nafta averages 2.0 goals per game with average offensive xG of 1.57 and average goals conceded 0.8, whereas at home Jesenice scores 1.1 goals per game with average xG against 1.86 and average goals conceded 2.1. In the last 5 matches Nafta scored 8 goals and averages 1.6 points per game, while Jesenice managed only 4 goals and 1.0 point per game; additionally Nafta have not had a goalless away game (0%), whereas Jesenice failed to score in 30% of their home matches. Nafta also show better shot conversion (17% vs 10%), more on-target shots on average (4.9 vs 4.5) and a higher clean sheet rate away (50% vs 20%), so I assess the probabilities as 70% for the visitors, 20% for a draw and 10% for the hosts.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The prediction leans toward BTTS 'Yes' because Jesenice has a seasonal BTTS rate of 82% and averages 2.64 goals scored at home, while Nafta records 2.0 goals away and a seasonal BTTS of 50% — both indicators favor goals from both sides. In the last 5 matches Nafta had BTTS at 80% and scored 8 goals (1.6 per game) with a recent xG of 1.64, whereas Jesenice in that period scored 4 goals (0.8 per game) and conceded 8 (1.6 per game), showing the hosts have recently struggled defensively. Seasonally Jesenice concedes 0.91 goals at home on average, and Nafta concedes 0.8 goals away, so although the visitors have solid defensive numbers, the hosts are more susceptible to conceding (Jesenice has only 18% clean sheets at home vs 50% for Nafta). Additionally the combined expected xG (1.81 for the hosts + 1.16 against the visitors = 2.97) exceeds the league average of 2.81, and the shots count 14.45 vs 11.8 and shots on target 5.82 vs 4.9 indicate concrete chance creation. Taking all this into account I give 70% for BTTS 'Yes' and 30% for 'No', because the hosts' history (82% BTTS) and the visitors' recent form (80% BTTS) outweigh Nafta's single advantage in keeping clean sheets.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Season statistics indicate strong goal potential: Jesenice averages 2.64 goals per match, Nafta 2.00, and neither side has had 0-0 games (100% of matches >0.5 goals). Looking at xG, Jesenice’s attacking xG is 1.81 and xG against for Nafta is 1.16, so expected goals for Jesenice ≈1.49 = (1.81+1.16)/2; similarly Nafta’s attacking xG 1.57 and xG against vs Jesenice 1.39 give Nafta ≈1.48, total ≈2.97. A Poisson model with λ=2.97 yields P(Over 1.5) ≈80%, P(Over 2.5) ≈57% and P(Over 3.5) ≈35%, supporting a high probability of at least two goals. Additionally Jesenice averages 14.45 shots (5.82 on target) with an 18% conversion, Nafta 11.8 shots (4.9 on target) with 17% conversion, and the share of matches with goals from both sides is 82% for the home team and 50% for the away team, which increases the likelihood of a goal-rich game. Therefore the strongest and most probable signal is an Over 1.5 bet, Over 2.5 has moderate support (~57%), and Over 3.5 is relatively risky (~35%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Jesenice have a clear offensive advantage: they score on average 2.64 goals per game with an xG of 1.81, taking 14.45 shots (5.82 on target), versus Nafta, who score 2.0 goals on average with an xG of 1.57 and 11.8 shots (4.9 on target). At half-time both teams average 1.0 goal each (scoredAVGHT_home 1.0 vs scoredAVGHT_away 1.0), and the average first-half goals is around 1.27–1.30, so a draw at the break (e.g. 1:1) is very likely; this is corroborated by the percentage of matches with at least one goal by half being 82% for the home side and 80% for the away side. In second halves the home team, however, dominate: AVG_2hg_home is 2.27, Jesenice score on average 1.64 goals after the break, while Nafta concedes on average 0.5 goals in second halves, which gives a strong signal that the home side will improve the result after the break. Additionally Jesenice led at half-time in 7 matches (64% according to the stats) and have a high share of home matches with both teams scoring (82%), whereas Nafta have 50% clean sheets this season; this suggests the home team more often break down the visitors’ defense during matches. Therefore the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1) — I select X/1 as the strongest signal based on Jesenice’s 1.64 average second-half goals and 2.27 average second-half goals in their matches.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

46Possession (%)54
JeseniceNafta
8Shots12
JeseniceNafta
3Shots on target3
JeseniceNafta
1.05xG1.57
JeseniceNafta
3Corners7
JeseniceNafta
44Dangerous attacks82
JeseniceNafta
-1Fouls-1
JeseniceNafta
-1Cards-1
JeseniceNafta

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1Goals scored / game2.33
JeseniceNafta
2.14Goals allowed / game0.86
JeseniceNafta
46%Average possession52%
JeseniceNafta
3.86Shots on target / game5.38
JeseniceNafta

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.19Shots per game13.19
JeseniceNafta
3.86Shots on target5.38
JeseniceNafta
10.9%Shot conversion17.7%
JeseniceNafta
46%Possession52%
JeseniceNafta
1.23xG for1.7
JeseniceNafta
1.95xG against1.28
JeseniceNafta

Shooting quality

Jesenice: BalancedNafta: Efficient finishing
JeseniceNafta
Accuracy (shots on target)42%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Nafta is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Jesenice · 1.8 pts / game - Nafta

Jesenice
WLLDD
Season result split
14% W29% D57% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-6-12
0.71 pts / game · goal difference -24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-3-6
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLLWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Nafta
DDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
76% W24% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
16-5-0
2.52 pts / game · goal difference +31
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
7-3-0
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WWWDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.73Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nafta is 133% better for: goals scored per game.

1 goals / game - Jesenice · 2.33 goals / game - Nafta

Nafta is 149% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.14 goals / game - Jesenice · 0.86 goals / game - Nafta

Jesenice scoring profile: strong

Jesenice scores in 62% of games (13 of 21 meczów), while Nafta keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 meczów).

Nafta scoring profile: very strong

Nafta scores in 100% of games (21 of 21 meczów), while Jesenice keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 meczów).

21Goals scored (season)49
JeseniceNafta
45Goals conceded (season)18
JeseniceNafta
3.14Average goals per game3.19
JeseniceNafta
4Goals scored (last 5)9
JeseniceNafta
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
JeseniceNafta

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal100%
JeseniceNafta
29%2 goals71%
JeseniceNafta
5%3 goals33%
JeseniceNafta
5%4 goals24%
JeseniceNafta

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal67%
JeseniceNafta
62%2 goals19%
JeseniceNafta
38%3 goals0%
JeseniceNafta
19%4 goals0%
JeseniceNafta

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time19%
JeseniceNafta
5%BTTS in both halves10%
JeseniceNafta
19%Scored in both halves52%
JeseniceNafta

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
JeseniceNafta
24%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
JeseniceNafta
40%BTTS - last 5100%
JeseniceNafta

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
JeseniceNafta
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
JeseniceNafta
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
JeseniceNafta

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time95%
JeseniceNafta
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time52%
JeseniceNafta
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
JeseniceNafta

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nafta is 149% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.86 pts / game - Jesenice · 2.14 pts / game - Nafta

Jesenice - half-time state
14% leading43% draw43% trailing
Nafta - half-time state
62% leading29% draw10% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.86Points per game (1st half)2.14
JeseniceNafta
0.38Goals scored (1st half)1
JeseniceNafta
0.76Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
JeseniceNafta
1.14Average goals (1st half)1.29
JeseniceNafta
43%Clean sheet before half-time71%
JeseniceNafta
67%No goal before half-time29%
JeseniceNafta

After half-time (2nd half)

0.9Points per game (2nd half)2
JeseniceNafta
0.62Goals scored (2nd half)1.33
JeseniceNafta
1.38Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
JeseniceNafta
2Average goals (2nd half)1.9
JeseniceNafta
38%Clean sheet after half-time48%
JeseniceNafta
52%No goal after half-time19%
JeseniceNafta

Jesenice - second-half results

19% W33% D48% L
18
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 14%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Nafta - second-half results

57% W29% D14% L
45
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+15
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+16
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at halftime in 62% of games and wins 76%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Jesenice - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game0.60.2
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.41.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Nafta - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.80
Goals scored / game0.21.6
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game0.62.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%0%
Goal difference-1+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Jesenice
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
1
2
16-30
3
9
31-45
2
9
46-60
3
9
61-75
8
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Nafta
ScoredConceded
7
2
0-15
6
2
16-30
8
2
31-45
6
2
46-60
11
7
61-75
11
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.17
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.9 : 2.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+90%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Jesenice

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.72
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
165%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Nafta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.63
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
179%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.72
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

JeseniceLigaNafta
Average goals per game 3.142.83 3.19
Both teams scored 48%49% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 62%54% 48%
Clean sheets 24%29% 33%
Goal before half-time 71%76% 81%
Goal after half-time 81%80% 95%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.83
Average goals per game
49%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / game
1.30
Away goals / game
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defensive advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. NaftaGoalBalázs Bakti

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Jesenice's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Nafta. Games average 6.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

NK Nafta 1903 Lendava
5 : 1
NK Jesenice

FAQ

What was the result of Jesenice vs Nafta?

The 2. SNL match finished Jesenice 0:2 Nafta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Jesenice vs Nafta?

Jesenice score 1.00 goals per game on average and Nafta 2.33. The 2. SNL average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Jesenice's matches and 67% of Nafta's.

What form are Jesenice and Nafta in?

Over the last 5 games Jesenice have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Nafta 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Jesenice vs Nafta?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Jesenice vs Nafta: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.