Jesenice vs Rudar: match statistics
Jesenice vs Rudar: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Jesenice play Rudar in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match date is 10 May 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Jesenice: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Rudar: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Jesenice scores 0.87 and concedes 2.27 goals per match. Rudar scores 1.53 and concedes 1.30. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Jesenice 43%, Rudar 53%. Over 2.5: Jesenice 57%, Rudar 60%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Rudar has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.21. Jesenice: 8.8 shots per match, Rudar: 10.4.
Match halves
Jesenice: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.47. Rudar: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.73.
Goals by minute
Jesenice: 76-90+ (8 goals). Rudar: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. SNL: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Jesenice sit 16th, with only 3 wins this season and 63 goals conceded; in the last 5 matches they have 0 points, scored 1 goal and conceded 16 (avg 3.2 goals per game). Rudar are 7th, have 9 wins and 43 goals scored this season; in their last 5 fixtures they average 1.8 points (2 wins and 3 draws), scoring 7 and conceding 3. In the away attack Rudar show a clear efficiency advantage: Rudar away average 1.38 goals, conversion 14% and xG 1.40, whereas Jesenice at home have 0.85 goals, conversion 8% and xG 1.28; average shots on target are similar (3.92 vs 3.85). Defensively the hosts are worse — Jesenice concede 2.15 goals at home with xG against 1.77, while Rudar concede 1.54 away with xG against 1.62; home goal difference is -17 versus -2 for the visitors. Considering form (0 points vs 1.8 points per game), the efficiency gap (14% vs 8%) and the hosts’ significant defensive issues, I predict a Rudar win and assess their probability of victory at 65%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Jesenice | Rudar | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Rudar is 133% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Jesenice · 1.4 pts / match - Rudar
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rudar is 76% better for: goals scored per match.
0.87 goals / match - Jesenice · 1.53 goals / match - Rudar
Rudar is 75% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.27 goals / match - Jesenice · 1.3 goals / match - Rudar
Jesenice scores in 53% of matches (16 of 30 matches), while Rudar keeps a clean sheet in 30% (9 of 30 matches).
Rudar scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Jesenice keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Jesenice
Over / Under — Rudar
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rudar is 61% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.87 pts / match - Jesenice · 1.4 pts / match - Rudar
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Jesenice - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Rudar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 30%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): -11 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Jesenice
Rudar
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Jesenice | Liga | Rudar | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.13 | 2.82 | • 2.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 50% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 54% | ▲ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 28% | ▲ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | • 73% | 74% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | • 80% | 81% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Jesenice 0 - 1 - 0 Rudar. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Jesenice vs Rudar?
The 2. SNL match finished Jesenice 2:1 Rudar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Jesenice vs Rudar?
Jesenice score 0.87 goals per game on average and Rudar 1.53. The 2. SNL average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Jesenice's matches and 53% of Rudar's.
What form are Jesenice and Rudar in?
Over the last 5 games Jesenice have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Rudar 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Jesenice vs Rudar?
The statistical background for Jesenice vs Rudar — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.