JIPPO vs KTP: match statistics
JIPPO vs KTP: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
JIPPO played against KTP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on April 18, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
JIPPO has 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. KTP has 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.
Scoring records
JIPPO scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 0.50. KTP scores 1.00 and allows 0.00. Games in this league average 2.11 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of JIPPO's games and 0% of KTP's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 0%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KTP has the higher season xG average, 1.90 to 1.73 per game. JIPPO takes 16.0 shots per game, while KTP takes 15.0.
First-half and second-half trends
JIPPO leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. KTP leads at halftime in 0% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
JIPPO's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (1 goals). For KTP, it is minutes 61-75 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.11 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1). JIPPO sits 3rd in the table and builds a clear home advantage: on average 16 shots and 5 shots on target per match and xG 1.89 versus xG against 0.49, indicating higher quality of created chances. KTP shows better short-term form (3 wins in last 5 and an average of 2 points per game) and more goals in the last five matches (7 vs 5), but their away metrics in the dataset are null (0 shots, 0 xG), which limits evidence of effectiveness on the road. Both teams conceded 6 goals in the last 5 matches, so I expect an open game with chances for both sides, but JIPPO’s superiority in chance creation (xG 1.89 and 65% possession for the home side) gives them the greater probability of victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Key indicators favor BTTS: in the last 5 matches both teams recorded BTTS in 80% of games (JIPPO 80%, KTP 80%), which is a strong short-term signal. In those five fixtures JIPPO scored 5 goals (avg 1.0) and conceded 6 (1.2), while KTP scored 7 (1.4) and conceded 6 (1.2), meaning both teams score and concede roughly 1.0–1.4 goals per match. Additionally recent xG is 1.61 for JIPPO and 1.31 for KTP, with xG against 1.12 and 0.80, so both sides generate scoring opportunities and are exposed to conceded goals. Seasonal league stats are more conservative (league BTTS 44%, clean sheet percentage 78%), and the provided season-long team data are inconsistent, therefore I place greater weight on form (JIPPO: lddwl, KTP: dwwwl) and the last five matches. Considering the 80% BTTS in the last five matches for both teams, the average goal total 1.0+1.4=2.4 exceeding the league average 2.11, and positive xG, I assess BTTS probability at 72% vs 28% and recommend the bet "Yes" (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on the last 5 matches, JIPPO has an average xG of 1.61 and KTP 1.31; average xG against is 1.12 for the home side and 0.80 for the away side. Averaging one team’s attack and the opponent’s defense yields 1.21 expected goals for JIPPO ((1.61+0.80)/2) and 1.22 for KTP ((1.31+1.12)/2), i.e., a combined 2.43 expected goals. The Poisson distribution for λ=2.43 gives roughly a 70% chance of more than 1.5 goals, about 44% for over 2.5 goals and around 23% for over 3.5 goals. Additionally, in the last 5 matches both teams exceeded 2.5 goals in 60% of cases, and both teams scored in 80% of fixtures; JIPPO also averages 15.0 shots and 6.0 shots on target with a seasonal xG of 1.9, which further supports a higher-goal outcome. Consequently, the strongest and safest signal from the available data is a play on Over 1.5, while the 2.5 line is close to a toss-up and offers lower betting value.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
JIPPO finished the first half level in 100% of home matches (drawingAtHTPercentage_home = 100.0), so the most likely Half-Time outcome is a draw. At the same time, the hosts won the second half in 100% of cases (wins_2hg_percentage_home = 100.0), scoring on average 1.0 goals after the break (scored_2hg_avg_home = 1.0), which suggests a turnaround after half-time and a home win. The gap in quality of chances is significant: JIPPO has an xG of 1.9 per match versus KTP’s xG of 0.0 (xg_for_avg_home = 1.9 vs xg_for_avg_away = 0.0) and averages 15 shots and 6 on target per match compared to 0 shots for the away side (shotsAVG_home = 15.0, shotsOnTargetAVG_home = 6.0). Nevertheless, the league features a high clean sheet rate of 78% and a low average goals figure of 2.11 (league_seasonCSPercentage = 78.0, league_seasonAVG_overall = 2.11), so a full-time draw cannot be completely ruled out. On this basis the strongest signal is a Half-Time draw and a home win at Full-Time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| JIPPO | KTP | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 22% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.17 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
KTP is 50% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - JIPPO · 3 pts / game - KTP
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
JIPPO scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 meczów), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 100% (1 of 1 meczów).
KTP scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 meczów), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - JIPPO
Over / Under - KTP
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KTP is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.5 pts / game - JIPPO · 1 pts / game - KTP
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JIPPO - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
KTP - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.50 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 50% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (1 goal). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
JIPPO
KTP
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| JIPPO | Liga | KTP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.50 | 2.11 | ▼ 1.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 44% | ▼ 0% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 44% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 39% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 67% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 56% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of JIPPO vs KTP?
The Ykkösliiga match finished JIPPO 0:0 KTP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before JIPPO vs KTP?
JIPPO score 1.00 goals per game on average and KTP 1.00. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 50% of JIPPO's matches and 0% of KTP's.
What form are JIPPO and KTP in?
Over the last 5 games JIPPO have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and KTP 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JIPPO vs KTP?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


