Finland - YkkösliigaData current as of September 06, 2026

JIPPO vs KTP: match statistics

JIPPO crest
JIPPO
0 : 0half-time 0:0
KTP crest
KTP

JIPPO vs KTP: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

JIPPO played against KTP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on April 18, 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

JIPPO has 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. KTP has 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.

Scoring records

JIPPO scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 0.50. KTP scores 1.00 and allows 0.00. Games in this league average 2.11 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of JIPPO's games and 0% of KTP's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 0%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

KTP has the higher season xG average, 1.90 to 1.73 per game. JIPPO takes 16.0 shots per game, while KTP takes 15.0.

First-half and second-half trends

JIPPO leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. KTP leads at halftime in 0% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

JIPPO's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (1 goals). For KTP, it is minutes 61-75 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ykkösliiga games average 2.11 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the home win (1). JIPPO sits 3rd in the table and builds a clear home advantage: on average 16 shots and 5 shots on target per match and xG 1.89 versus xG against 0.49, indicating higher quality of created chances. KTP shows better short-term form (3 wins in last 5 and an average of 2 points per game) and more goals in the last five matches (7 vs 5), but their away metrics in the dataset are null (0 shots, 0 xG), which limits evidence of effectiveness on the road. Both teams conceded 6 goals in the last 5 matches, so I expect an open game with chances for both sides, but JIPPO’s superiority in chance creation (xG 1.89 and 65% possession for the home side) gives them the greater probability of victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Key indicators favor BTTS: in the last 5 matches both teams recorded BTTS in 80% of games (JIPPO 80%, KTP 80%), which is a strong short-term signal. In those five fixtures JIPPO scored 5 goals (avg 1.0) and conceded 6 (1.2), while KTP scored 7 (1.4) and conceded 6 (1.2), meaning both teams score and concede roughly 1.0–1.4 goals per match. Additionally recent xG is 1.61 for JIPPO and 1.31 for KTP, with xG against 1.12 and 0.80, so both sides generate scoring opportunities and are exposed to conceded goals. Seasonal league stats are more conservative (league BTTS 44%, clean sheet percentage 78%), and the provided season-long team data are inconsistent, therefore I place greater weight on form (JIPPO: lddwl, KTP: dwwwl) and the last five matches. Considering the 80% BTTS in the last five matches for both teams, the average goal total 1.0+1.4=2.4 exceeding the league average 2.11, and positive xG, I assess BTTS probability at 72% vs 28% and recommend the bet "Yes" (BTTS - Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on the last 5 matches, JIPPO has an average xG of 1.61 and KTP 1.31; average xG against is 1.12 for the home side and 0.80 for the away side. Averaging one team’s attack and the opponent’s defense yields 1.21 expected goals for JIPPO ((1.61+0.80)/2) and 1.22 for KTP ((1.31+1.12)/2), i.e., a combined 2.43 expected goals. The Poisson distribution for λ=2.43 gives roughly a 70% chance of more than 1.5 goals, about 44% for over 2.5 goals and around 23% for over 3.5 goals. Additionally, in the last 5 matches both teams exceeded 2.5 goals in 60% of cases, and both teams scored in 80% of fixtures; JIPPO also averages 15.0 shots and 6.0 shots on target with a seasonal xG of 1.9, which further supports a higher-goal outcome. Consequently, the strongest and safest signal from the available data is a play on Over 1.5, while the 2.5 line is close to a toss-up and offers lower betting value.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

JIPPO finished the first half level in 100% of home matches (drawingAtHTPercentage_home = 100.0), so the most likely Half-Time outcome is a draw. At the same time, the hosts won the second half in 100% of cases (wins_2hg_percentage_home = 100.0), scoring on average 1.0 goals after the break (scored_2hg_avg_home = 1.0), which suggests a turnaround after half-time and a home win. The gap in quality of chances is significant: JIPPO has an xG of 1.9 per match versus KTP’s xG of 0.0 (xg_for_avg_home = 1.9 vs xg_for_avg_away = 0.0) and averages 15 shots and 6 on target per match compared to 0 shots for the away side (shotsAVG_home = 15.0, shotsOnTargetAVG_home = 6.0). Nevertheless, the league features a high clean sheet rate of 78% and a low average goals figure of 2.11 (league_seasonCSPercentage = 78.0, league_seasonAVG_overall = 2.11), so a full-time draw cannot be completely ruled out. On this basis the strongest signal is a Half-Time draw and a home win at Full-Time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

50Possession (%)50
JIPPOKTP
9Shots12
JIPPOKTP
4Shots on target1
JIPPOKTP
1.35xG1.26
JIPPOKTP
5Corners3
JIPPOKTP
69Dangerous attacks61
JIPPOKTP
4Fouls7
JIPPOKTP
1Cards2
JIPPOKTP

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1Goals scored / game1
JIPPOKTP
0.5Goals allowed / game0
JIPPOKTP
61%Average possession57%
JIPPOKTP
3.5Shots on target / game6
JIPPOKTP

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

16Shots per game15
JIPPOKTP
3.5Shots on target6
JIPPOKTP
6.3%Shot conversion6.7%
JIPPOKTP
61%Possession57%
JIPPOKTP
1.73xG for1.9
JIPPOKTP
0.92xG against0.57
JIPPOKTP

Shooting quality

JIPPO: DominantKTP: Dominant
JIPPOKTP
Accuracy (shots on target)22%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.17

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

KTP is 50% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - JIPPO · 3 pts / game - KTP

JIPPO
DW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 at home
0-1-0
D
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.73Opponent xG: 0.92BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%
KTP
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.90Opponent xG: 0.57BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

JIPPO scoring profile: more difficult

JIPPO scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 meczów), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 100% (1 of 1 meczów).

KTP scoring profile: very strong

KTP scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 meczów), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 meczów).

2Goals scored (season)1
JIPPOKTP
1Goals conceded (season)0
JIPPOKTP
1.5Average goals per game1
JIPPOKTP
2Goals scored (last 5)1
JIPPOKTP
1Goals conceded (last 5)0
JIPPOKTP

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal100%
JIPPOKTP
50%2 goals0%
JIPPOKTP
0%3 goals0%
JIPPOKTP
0%4 goals0%
JIPPOKTP

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal0%
JIPPOKTP
0%2 goals0%
JIPPOKTP
0%3 goals0%
JIPPOKTP
0%4 goals0%
JIPPOKTP

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
JIPPOKTP
0%BTTS in both halves0%
JIPPOKTP
0%Scored in both halves0%
JIPPOKTP

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
JIPPOKTP
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
JIPPOKTP
50%BTTS - last 50%
JIPPOKTP

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time0%
JIPPOKTP
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
JIPPOKTP
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
JIPPOKTP

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
JIPPOKTP
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
JIPPOKTP
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
JIPPOKTP

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KTP is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / game - JIPPO · 1 pts / game - KTP

JIPPO - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing
KTP - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per game (1st half)1
JIPPOKTP
0Goals scored (1st half)0
JIPPOKTP
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0
JIPPOKTP
0.5Average goals (1st half)0
JIPPOKTP
50%Clean sheet before half-time100%
JIPPOKTP
100%No goal before half-time100%
JIPPOKTP

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per game (2nd half)3
JIPPOKTP
1Goals scored (2nd half)1
JIPPOKTP
0Goals conceded (2nd half)0
JIPPOKTP
1Average goals (2nd half)1
JIPPOKTP
100%Clean sheet after half-time100%
JIPPOKTP
50%No goal after half-time0%
JIPPOKTP

JIPPO - second-half results

50% W50% R0% P
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.5

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

KTP - second-half results

100% W0% R0% P
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

JIPPO - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.502.00
Goals scored / game0.01.0
Goals allowed / game0.50.0
Average goals per game0.51.0
1 goal50%50%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%100%
No goal100%50%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
KTP - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.003.00
Goals scored / game0.01.0
Goals allowed / game0.00.0
Average goals per game0.01.0
1 goal0%100%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

JIPPO
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

KTP
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (1 goal). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.25
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.5 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
59%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

JIPPO

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.81
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.73
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

KTP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.90
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.57
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
0%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

JIPPOLigaKTP
Average goals per game 1.502.11 1.00
Both teams scored 50%44% 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%44% 0%
Clean sheets 50%39% 100%
Goal before half-time 50%67% 0%
Goal after half-time 50%56% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.11
Average goals per game
44%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.22
Home goals / game
0.89
Away goals / game
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defensive advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KTPYellow cardDerrick Atta Agyei
  2. JIPPOSubstitutionOn: Victor de PaulaOff: Valtteri Vesiaho
  3. KTPYellow cardNathaniel Tahmbi
  4. KTPSubstitutionOn: Atomu TanakaOff: Onni Hänninen
  5. JIPPOYellow cardPasi Forsman
  6. JIPPOSubstitutionOn: Joona MalinenOff: Lassi Forss

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of JIPPO vs KTP?

The Ykkösliiga match finished JIPPO 0:0 KTP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before JIPPO vs KTP?

JIPPO score 1.00 goals per game on average and KTP 1.00. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 50% of JIPPO's matches and 0% of KTP's.

What form are JIPPO and KTP in?

Over the last 5 games JIPPO have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and KTP 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JIPPO vs KTP?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.