JIPPO vs PK-35: match statistics
JIPPO vs PK-35: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
JIPPO played against PK-35 in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on September 26, 2026. Venue: Joensuun Keskuskenttä. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
JIPPO has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. PK-35 has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
JIPPO scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 0.88. PK-35 scores 1.71 and allows 0.75. Games in this league average 2.59 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 42% of JIPPO's games and 38% of PK-35's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 50%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
JIPPO has the higher season xG average, 1.64 to 1.44 per game. JIPPO takes 13.4 shots per game, while PK-35 takes 11.6.
First-half and second-half trends
JIPPO leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.88 goals per game after halftime. PK-35 leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.96 after halftime.
When the teams score
JIPPO's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). For PK-35, it is minutes 46-60 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.59 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 3 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
PK-35 sit 2nd, while JIPPO are fourth, and over the course of the season the visitors have won 14 of 24 matches, suffering just 4 defeats. The strongest argument in favor of PK-35 is their away form: they win 82% of their matches on the road, score an average of 2.00 goals and concede just 0.18 per game, while keeping a clean sheet in 82% of their away appearances. At home, JIPPO control possession for an average of 59% of the match and create chances worth 1.87 xG, yet score only 1.08 goals, failing to find the net in 42% of their home games. The visitors are more clinical in front of goal, converting 17% of their shots compared with JIPPO’s 7%, while their recent form is also marginally better: 10 points from five matches compared with 9 for the hosts. JIPPO have conceded just 5 goals in their last five fixtures, so this could be a closely contested match; however, PK-35’s exceptionally solid away defense supports a victory for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal for BTTS - No comes from PK-35, who have kept a clean sheet in 82% of their matches, with both teams scoring in only 9% of games. The visitors concede an average of just 0.18 goals per match, while JIPPO fail to score in 31% of their appearances, meaning the hosts may struggle to break through the opposition’s defense. In their last five matches, PK-35 allowed opponents an average of 0.8 goals, and BTTS occurred in only 20% of games, reinforcing this angle. JIPPO do have a season BTTS rate of 62% and average xG of 1.43, but PK-35 combine an effective attack, averaging 2.0 goals, with a very high number of clean sheets. A scenario in which at least one team fails to score is clearly more likely than a Goal/Goal outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
PK-35 combines a very strong away attack, averaging 2.00 goals, with an exceptionally tight defense that concedes only 0.18 goals per match and keeps a clean sheet in 82% of games. This clearly limits JIPPO’s attacking potential, as they average 1.46 goals at home but fail to score in 31% of matches. Across the season, PK-35’s games have finished Under 3.5 goals in 82% of cases, while the figure for JIPPO is also a high 69%. The teams’ last five matches produced an average of 2.7 goals in total, although PK-35 conceded just 0.8 goals per game during this period. The projected total of 2.30 goals points to value on Under 3.5 goals, as a result requiring at least four goals would need to break through the visitors’ very solid defense.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
PK-35 have a clear advantage across the season: they win 82% of their matches and average 2.00 goals, while JIPPO win 38% of their games with an average of 1.46 goals. The strongest signal concerns the first half, as the visitors have held a lead at the break in 55% of their matches—and in as many as 60% of their last five—whereas JIPPO have failed to take the lead even once in this period and have not scored before half-time. PK-35 concede just 0.18 goals per match on average and keep a clean sheet in 82% of their appearances, which significantly limits the hosts’ prospects of a turnaround. The visitors have also remained unbeaten in the second half throughout the season, winning 55% of second halves and keeping a clean sheet in every match during that period. JIPPO have a better recent record after the interval, averaging 1.60 goals, but PK-35’s first-half advantage and exceptionally solid defense make the scenario of the visitors leading at half-time and securing the full-time win the most likely outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| JIPPO | PK-35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
PK-35 is 11% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - JIPPO · 2 pts / game - PK-35
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
PK-35 is 29% better for: goals scored per game.
1.33 goals / game - JIPPO · 1.71 goals / game - PK-35
PK-35 is 17% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.88 goals / game - JIPPO · 0.75 goals / game - PK-35
JIPPO scores in 67% of games (16 of 24 games), while PK-35 keeps a clean sheet in 50% (12 of 24 games).
PK-35 scores in 75% of games (18 of 24 games), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 38% (9 of 24 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - JIPPO
Over / Under - PK-35
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
PK-35 is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.21 pts / game - JIPPO · 1.58 pts / game - PK-35
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JIPPO - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
PK-35 - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 58%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +6 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
JIPPO
PK-35
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| JIPPO | Liga | PK-35 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.21 | 2.59 | ▼ 2.46 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 46% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 46% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 30% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 67% | ▼ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 74% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from JIPPO's perspective: 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss against PK-35. Games average 1.80 goals, and both teams scored in 60% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of JIPPO vs PK-35?
The Ykkösliiga match finished JIPPO 0:0 PK-35. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between JIPPO and PK-35?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches JIPPO won 1, PK-35 won 1 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 1.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before JIPPO vs PK-35?
JIPPO score 1.33 goals per game on average and PK-35 1.71. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 42% of JIPPO's matches and 38% of PK-35's.
What form are JIPPO and PK-35 in?
Over the last 5 games JIPPO have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and PK-35 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JIPPO vs PK-35?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


