JIPPO vs SJK Akatemia: match statistics
JIPPO vs SJK Akatemia: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
JIPPO play SJK Akatemia in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 25 April 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
JIPPO: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. SJK Akatemia: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
JIPPO scores 1.47 and concedes 0.73 goals per match. SJK Akatemia scores 0.47 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.47 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: JIPPO 47%, SJK Akatemia 27%. Over 2.5: JIPPO 40%, SJK Akatemia 20%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
JIPPO has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.20. JIPPO: 13.6 shots per match, SJK Akatemia: 9.3.
Match halves
JIPPO: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.80. SJK Akatemia: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.40.
Goals by minute
JIPPO: 76-90+ (7 goals). SJK Akatemia: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
4 H2H matches: 1-2-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 75%.
Match description
JIPPO has a clear creative and statistical edge: the home side’s average xG is 1.62 versus SJK’s 1.10, with 12.5 shots per game against 7 and 4.5 shots on target versus 3. At home JIPPO concedes no goals (0.0 GA average) and has 100% clean sheets, while SJK concedes 2.0 goals on average away and has recorded 0% clean sheets. The hosts’ issue is finishing — they show 0% conversion rate and 100% FTS in the data, whereas SJK posts a high 29% conversion and averages 2.0 goals on the road. In the last 5 matches JIPPO scored 4 goals and form is 'ddwld', while SJK has 7 goals and form 'lwdwl', indicating the visitors’ attacking efficiency. Considering higher xG, a passing supremacy (58% vs 48%) and the hosts’ solid defence, I back JIPPO to win, though I expect a tight match.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| JIPPO | SJK Akatemia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.17 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
JIPPO is 450% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - JIPPO · 0.4 pts / match - SJK Akatemia
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
JIPPO is 213% better for: goals scored per match.
1.47 goals / match - JIPPO · 0.47 goals / match - SJK Akatemia
JIPPO is 82% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.73 goals / match - JIPPO · 1.33 goals / match - SJK Akatemia
JIPPO scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while SJK Akatemia keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).
SJK Akatemia scores in 33% of matches (5 of 15 matches), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — JIPPO
Over / Under — SJK Akatemia
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
JIPPO is 101% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / match - JIPPO · 0.73 pts / match - SJK Akatemia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JIPPO - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
SJK Akatemia - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 7%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
JIPPO
SJK Akatemia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| JIPPO | Liga | SJK Akatemia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.20 | 2.47 | ▼ 1.80 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 47% | 44% | ▼ 27% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 44% | ▼ 20% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 47% | 31% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | • 60% | 60% | ▼ 47% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 60% | 73% | • 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): JIPPO 1 - 2 - 1 SJK Akatemia. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 75% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of JIPPO vs SJK Akatemia?
The Ykkösliiga match finished JIPPO 1:0 SJK Akatemia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between JIPPO and SJK Akatemia?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches JIPPO won 1, SJK Akatemia won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before JIPPO vs SJK Akatemia?
JIPPO score 1.47 goals per game on average and SJK Akatemia 0.47. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 47% of JIPPO's matches and 27% of SJK Akatemia's.
What form are JIPPO and SJK Akatemia in?
Over the last 5 games JIPPO have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and SJK Akatemia 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JIPPO vs SJK Akatemia?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.