Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraIsamuhyo StadiumData current as of November 03, 2026

JKT Tanzania vs Azam: match statistics

JKT Tanzania crest
JKT Tanzania
1 : 2half-time 1:1
Azam crest
Azam

JKT Tanzania vs Azam: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

JKT Tanzania played against Azam in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The game was played on October 31, 2026. Venue: Isamuhyo Stadium. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

JKT Tanzania has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Azam has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.

Scoring records

JKT Tanzania scores 1.20 goals per game and allows 1.20. Azam scores 1.89 and allows 0.78. Games in this league average 2.36 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of JKT Tanzania's games and 44% of Azam's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 44%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 40% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Azam has the higher season xG average, 1.81 to 1.34 per game. JKT Tanzania takes 6.4 shots per game, while Azam takes 9.1.

First-half and second-half trends

JKT Tanzania leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.70 goals per game after halftime. Azam leads at halftime in 67% and scores 0.89 after halftime.

When the teams score

JKT Tanzania's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). For Azam, it is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ligi kuu Bara games average 2.36 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 40% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

JKT Tanzania have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 9 goals in the process, while Azam have recorded 3 wins and scored 6. The hosts’ home advantage is a key factor: they have won 4 of their 5 home games, averaging 1.8 goals scored and 0.6 conceded. Azam are also unbeaten away from home, and their average xG of 1.66 is higher than the hosts’ 1.57, giving the visitors a strong case for creating good chances. However, JKT are more clinical in front of goal at home, converting 20% of their shots compared with Azam’s 15% away, and limit opponents to lower-quality chances, with an average xG against of 1.19 compared with the visitors’ 1.33. These advantages give the hosts a slight edge, although Azam’s two draws in four away games mean a share of the points remains a realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have recorded BTTS in 50% of their matches this season, but the last five fixtures point to a difference: the rate was 60% for JKT Tanzania and just 20% for Azam. Azam have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their matches and concede an average of 0.75 goals, limiting the hosts’ chances of scoring. On the other hand, JKT Tanzania have an xG of 2.02 at home, while Azam score an average of 1.75 goals away, so both sides have attacking strengths. Even so, Azam’s low goals-conceded rate, along with the visitors conceding an average of just 0.6 goals in their last five matches, tilts the forecast slightly toward BTTS - No: at least one team is expected not to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal points to Under 3.5 goals: this line has not been exceeded in any of JKT Tanzania’s matches so far, and in 75% of Azam’s games. The teams average 1.5 and 1.75 goals scored respectively, but concede only 1.0 and 0.75, limiting the likelihood of a very high-scoring game. In their last five matches, JKT conceded an average of 0.8 goals and Azam 0.6; moreover, none of Azam’s last five games went over 2.5 goals. Although average attacking xG stands at 2.02 for the hosts and 1.66 for the visitors, the scoring patterns to date support a more cautious forecast of around 2.45 goals and a pick on Under 3.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome: JKT Tanzania were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches, and both teams kept a clean sheet in the first half in 4 of 5 games. The hosts’ form points to a later win: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, compared with Azam’s 3, while their average goals scored were 1.8 and 1.2, respectively. JKT Tanzania also have a higher average xG, 2.02 compared with the visitors’ 1.66, suggesting greater potential to create a chance for the decisive goal. However, the X/1 pick is not a certainty, as Azam have won the second half in 4 of their last 5 matches, so a draw at half-time followed by an away win remains a significant alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

51Possession (%)49
JKT TanzaniaAzam
3Shots8
JKT TanzaniaAzam
1Shots on target3
JKT TanzaniaAzam
0.69xG1.09
JKT TanzaniaAzam
3Corners6
JKT TanzaniaAzam
58Dangerous attacks51
JKT TanzaniaAzam
1Fouls0
JKT TanzaniaAzam
0Cards0
JKT TanzaniaAzam

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.2Goals scored / game1.89
JKT TanzaniaAzam
1.2Goals allowed / game0.78
JKT TanzaniaAzam
47%Average possession50%
JKT TanzaniaAzam
2.5Shots on target / game5
JKT TanzaniaAzam

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

6.4Shots per game9.11
JKT TanzaniaAzam
2.5Shots on target5
JKT TanzaniaAzam
18.8%Shot conversion20.7%
JKT TanzaniaAzam
47%Possession50%
JKT TanzaniaAzam
1.34xG for1.81
JKT TanzaniaAzam
1.4xG against1.24
JKT TanzaniaAzam

Shooting quality

JKT Tanzania: Counter-attackingAzam: Efficient finishing
JKT TanzaniaAzam
Accuracy (shots on target)39%55%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.210.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.480.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Azam is 20% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - JKT Tanzania · 2.4 pts / game - Azam

JKT Tanzania
LWWWD
Season result split
50% W20% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-3
1.70 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 0.86BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Azam
WWLWW
Season result split
67% W22% D11% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-1
2.22 pts / game · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-0
Last 5 away
2-2-0
DDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 0.98BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Azam is 57% better for: goals scored per game.

1.2 goals / game - JKT Tanzania · 1.89 goals / game - Azam

Azam is 54% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.2 goals / game - JKT Tanzania · 0.78 goals / game - Azam

JKT Tanzania scoring profile: strong

JKT Tanzania scores in 70% of games (7 of 10 games), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 44% (4 of 9 games).

Azam scoring profile: very strong

Azam scores in 89% of games (8 of 9 games), while JKT Tanzania keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 games).

12Goals scored (season)17
JKT TanzaniaAzam
12Goals conceded (season)7
JKT TanzaniaAzam
2.4Average goals per game2.67
JKT TanzaniaAzam
6Goals scored (last 5)10
JKT TanzaniaAzam
4Goals conceded (last 5)2
JKT TanzaniaAzam

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal89%
JKT TanzaniaAzam
40%2 goals78%
JKT TanzaniaAzam
10%3 goals11%
JKT TanzaniaAzam
0%4 goals11%
JKT TanzaniaAzam

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal56%
JKT TanzaniaAzam
30%2 goals22%
JKT TanzaniaAzam
10%3 goals0%
JKT TanzaniaAzam
10%4 goals0%
JKT TanzaniaAzam

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time11%
JKT TanzaniaAzam
0%BTTS in both halves0%
JKT TanzaniaAzam
10%Scored in both halves56%
JKT TanzaniaAzam

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
JKT TanzaniaAzam
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
JKT TanzaniaAzam
60%BTTS - last 50%
JKT TanzaniaAzam

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
JKT TanzaniaAzam
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
JKT TanzaniaAzam
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
JKT TanzaniaAzam

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
JKT TanzaniaAzam
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
JKT TanzaniaAzam
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
JKT TanzaniaAzam

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Azam is 112% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.1 pts / game - JKT Tanzania · 2.33 pts / game - Azam

JKT Tanzania - half-time state
20% leading50% draw30% trailing
Azam - half-time state
67% leading33% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.1Points per game (1st half)2.33
JKT TanzaniaAzam
0.5Goals scored (1st half)1
JKT TanzaniaAzam
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.11
JKT TanzaniaAzam
1.1Average goals (1st half)1.11
JKT TanzaniaAzam
60%Clean sheet before half-time89%
JKT TanzaniaAzam
70%No goal before half-time22%
JKT TanzaniaAzam

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per game (2nd half)1.56
JKT TanzaniaAzam
0.7Goals scored (2nd half)0.89
JKT TanzaniaAzam
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
JKT TanzaniaAzam
1.3Average goals (2nd half)1.56
JKT TanzaniaAzam
40%Clean sheet after half-time56%
JKT TanzaniaAzam
50%No goal after half-time33%
JKT TanzaniaAzam

JKT Tanzania - second-half results

40% W30% D30% L
11
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding250%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Azam - second-half results

44% W22% D33% L
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

JKT Tanzania - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.60
Goals scored / game0.40.8
Goals allowed / game0.20.6
Average goals per game0.61.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Azam - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.602.00
Goals scored / game1.01.0
Goals allowed / game0.00.4
Average goals per game1.01.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+5+3
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

JKT Tanzania
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
3
4
31-45
3
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Azam
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
5
0
16-30
3
1
31-45
0
2
46-60
4
1
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.54
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

JKT Tanzania

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Azam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
201%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
55%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

JKT TanzaniaLigaAzam
Average goals per game• 2.402.36▲ 2.67
Both teams scored▲ 50%48%▼ 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 60%40%▲ 44%
Clean sheets• 30%29%▲ 44%
Goal before half-time▼ 60%73%▲ 78%
Goal after half-time▲ 80%68%▲ 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.36
Average goals per game
48%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.43
Home goals / game
0.94
Away goals / game
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defensive advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from JKT Tanzania's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Azam. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Azam
3 : 0
JKT Tanzania
JKT Tanzania
1 : 1
Azam

FAQ

What was the result of JKT Tanzania vs Azam?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished JKT Tanzania 1:2 Azam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between JKT Tanzania and Azam?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches JKT Tanzania won 0, Azam won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before JKT Tanzania vs Azam?

JKT Tanzania score 1.20 goals per game on average and Azam 1.89. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.36 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 50% of JKT Tanzania's matches and 44% of Azam's.

What form are JKT Tanzania and Azam in?

Over the last 5 games JKT Tanzania have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Azam 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JKT Tanzania vs Azam?

The statistical background for JKT Tanzania vs Azam — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.