JKT Tanzania vs Kitayosce: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

JKT Tanzania play Kitayosce in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 26 November 2025 at 16:15. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

JKT Tanzania: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Kitayosce: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

JKT Tanzania scores 1.00 and concedes 1.10 goals per match. Kitayosce scores 1.10 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: JKT Tanzania 43%, Kitayosce 33%. Over 2.5: JKT Tanzania 40%, Kitayosce 40%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Kitayosce has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.18. JKT Tanzania: 6.5 shots per match, Kitayosce: 6.2.

Match halves

JKT Tanzania: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.63. Kitayosce: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.47.

Goals by minute

JKT Tanzania: 76-90+ (10 goals). Kitayosce: 0-15 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
8Shots4
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
1Shots on target0
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
1xG0.57
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
6Corners2
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
58Dangerous attacks43
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
22Fouls29
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
0Cards0
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
1Goals scored / match1.1
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
1.1Goals conceded / match0.93
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
48%Average possession42%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
2.73Shots on target / match2.27
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.53Shots per match6.23
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
2.73Shots on target2.27
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
15.3%Shot conversion17.6%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
48%Possession42%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
1.18xG for1.25
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
1.14xG against1.3
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce

Shooting quality

JKT Tanzania: Efficient finishingKitayosce: Counter-attacking
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
Accuracy (shots on target)42%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.48

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kitayosce is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - JKT Tanzania · 1.2 pts / match - Kitayosce

JKT Tanzania
LLDWL
Season result split
33% W40% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-12-8
1.40 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-5-5
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
WDLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.04Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Kitayosce
WDDLD
Season result split
37% W33% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-10-9
1.43 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-7
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitayosce is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - JKT Tanzania · 1.1 goals / match - Kitayosce

Kitayosce is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.1 goals / match - JKT Tanzania · 0.93 goals / match - Kitayosce

JKT Tanzania scoring profile: strong

JKT Tanzania scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 43% (13 of 30 matches).

Kitayosce scoring profile: mixed

Kitayosce scores in 57% of matches (17 of 30 matches), while JKT Tanzania keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).

30Goals scored (season)33
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
33Goals conceded (season)28
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
2.1Average goals in match2.03
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
3Goals scored (last 5)2
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
7Goals conceded (last 5)4
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal57%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
27%2 goals30%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
3%3 goals17%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
0%4 goals7%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal57%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
30%2 goals27%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
10%3 goals10%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
3%4 goals0%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

35%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
0%BTTS in both halves0%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
10%Scored in both halves13%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
40%BTTS - last 520%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time57%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time23%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitayosce is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.97 pts / match - JKT Tanzania · 1.13 pts / match - Kitayosce

JKT Tanzania - half-time state
13% leading57% draw30% trailing
Kitayosce - half-time state
20% leading53% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.97Points per match (1st half)1.13
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
0.3Goals scored (1st half)0.53
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
0.8Average goals (1st half)1
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
53%Clean sheet before half-time60%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
73%No goal before half-time67%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce

After half-time (2nd half)

1.57Points per match (2nd half)1.3
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.47
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.43
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
1.23Average goals (2nd half)0.9
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
63%Clean sheet after half-time67%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce
50%No goal after half-time67%
JKT TanzaniaKitayosce

JKT Tanzania - second-half results

40% W37% R23% P
29
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding254%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kitayosce - second-half results

27% W50% R23% P
34
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding185%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

JKT Tanzania - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Kitayosce - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.40.8
1 goal40%40%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

JKT Tanzania
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
2
4
16-30
4
5
31-45
4
5
46-60
5
9
61-75
10
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Kitayosce
ScoredConceded
8
4
0-15
4
4
16-30
7
7
31-45
6
4
46-60
4
4
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.07
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

JKT Tanzania

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
126%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Kitayosce

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

JKT TanzaniaLigaKitayosce
Average goals in match 2.102.17 2.03
Both teams scored 43%35% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%39% 40%
Clean sheets 37%39% 43%
Goal before half-time 57%60% 57%
Goal after half-time 70%63% 57%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
35%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+49%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: JKT Tanzania 0 - 1 - 0 Kitayosce. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of JKT Tanzania vs Kitayosce?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished JKT Tanzania 1:0 Kitayosce. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before JKT Tanzania vs Kitayosce?

JKT Tanzania score 1.00 goals per game on average and Kitayosce 1.10. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 43% of JKT Tanzania's matches and 33% of Kitayosce's.

What form are JKT Tanzania and Kitayosce in?

Over the last 5 games JKT Tanzania have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Kitayosce 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JKT Tanzania vs Kitayosce?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.