Peru - Primera DivisiónData current as of September 08, 2026

Juan Pablo II College vs UTC Cajamarca: match statistics

Juan Pablo II College vs UTC Cajamarca: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Juan Pablo II College played against UTC Cajamarca in Primera División (Peru). The game was played on April 5, 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Juan Pablo II College has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. UTC Cajamarca has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Juan Pablo II College scores 1.63 goals per game and allows 2.50. UTC Cajamarca scores 1.38 and allows 1.13. Games in this league average 2.63 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 75% of Juan Pablo II College's games and 50% of UTC Cajamarca's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 38%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

UTC Cajamarca has the higher season xG average, 1.44 to 1.09 per game. Juan Pablo II College takes 9.9 shots per game, while UTC Cajamarca takes 13.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Juan Pablo II College leads at halftime in 13% of its games and scores 1.13 goals per game after halftime. UTC Cajamarca leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.88 after halftime.

When the teams score

Juan Pablo II College's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For UTC Cajamarca, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Primera División games average 2.63 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

UTC Cajamarca holds a clear advantage in game control and quality of chances: average possession 54% vs 46% for the hosts and xG 1.61 vs 1.20 for the hosts, indicating the visitors generate more high-value opportunities. Away UTC averages 15.25 shots and 6.5 on target per match, while Juan Pablo II records 11.25 shots and only 3.75 on target, meaning the visitors attempt and hit the target almost twice as often (6.5 vs 3.75). Despite a higher volume of attempts, the hosts are more efficient in finishing — Juan Pablo II conversion rate is 16% vs 11% for UTC — which explains the similar goals-per-game averages (1.75 each). A concern for the hosts is their home defense: they concede 2.25 goals per match at home, while UTC concedes 1.75 away; in the last 5 matches Juan Pablo II scored 9 goals and averages 1.8 points per game versus 1.0 for the visitors. Considering UTC’s xG advantage (1.61 vs 1.20), superior possession and shot metrics, and the hosts’ worse goals-against average, I forecast a narrow away victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Season and last-5 statistics favor a Both Teams To Score scenario: the home side has a season BTTS of 25% but a last-5 BTTS of 80%, while the away side has a season BTTS of 75% and 60% in their last 5 matches. Chance quality favors the visitors — their average xG is 1.61 versus the home 1.26, and the away team averages 15.25 shots and 6.5 shots on target per match compared to the home 11.5 and 4.25, increasing the likelihood that the away team will score at least once. Despite a season goals average of 1.0, the home team have averaged 1.8 goals scored and 1.8 conceded in their last 5 (9 for and 9 against), while the visitors seasonally score 1.75 and concede 1.75, which suggests goal exchanges. Considering the league average BTTS of 56%, 0% clean sheets for the away team versus 50% clean sheets for the home team, combined with recent form of 80%/60% and the away xG advantage, I assess BTTS - Yes at 75% and No at 25%; the recommended pick is 'yes'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The combined xG and opponent defensive model yields expected goals: home 1.29 (xG attack 1.26 vs xG against visitors 1.31), away 1.32 (xG attack 1.61 vs xG against hosts 1.03), total 2.61. A Poisson model on a 2.61 mean calculates probability Over 1.5 at ~73%, Over 2.5 ~48% and Over 3.5 ~26%. Additionally, the away team has a season rate of matches Over 2.5 of 75% and BTTS 75%, while the home side scored 9 goals in the last 5 matches (1.8 average) and had 80% of recent matches Over 2.5, which strengthens the over signal. As a result I give a strong signal on Over 1.5 (74% probability) as the best line to play; the 2.5 line is marginal (~49%/51%) and does not provide as clear an edge, while Over 3.5 is unlikely (~27%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The primary half-time signal favors the home side: Juan Pablo II College led at the break in 2 of 4 matches (50%), averages 0.5 goals in the first half and concedes 0.0 goals before the break (average goals conceded by half-time 0.0), with a 100% clean-sheet rate at half-time in their games. UTC Cajamarca also averages 0.5 first-half goals but concedes 0.75 goals to half-time on average and has zero leads at the break, which reduces their likelihood of taking a lead in the first half. Over the full match the form also supports the home side: in the last 5 matches Juan Pablo II has won 60% (3 of 5) versus the visitors’ 20% (1 of 5), and the home team accumulated 8 points at half-time, equivalent to an average of 2.0 points in this scenario—this increases the chance of holding the lead through to full-time. The risk of an equalizer from UTC stems from their superior attacking metrics: higher xG 1.61 vs 1.26, on average 15.25 shots per match vs 11.5 and 6.5 shots on target vs 4.25, and higher conversion rate 11% vs 9%; additionally UTC scored 5 goals in minutes 76–90, so a turnaround is realistic. Considering the 50% home leads at half-time, 100% home half-time clean sheets and better recent form, the strongest signal is home leading at half-time and home winning the match (HT/FT 1/1), therefore the recommendation is 1/1 with a 35% probability.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

43Possession (%)57
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
8Shots9
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
3Shots on target2
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
0.92xG1.04
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
3Corners7
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
27Dangerous attacks45
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
11Fouls17
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
2Cards8
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
1.63Goals scored / game1.38
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
2.5Goals allowed / game1.13
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
44%Average possession49%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
3.75Shots on target / game5.38
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.88Shots per game13.38
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
3.75Shots on target5.38
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
16.5%Shot conversion10.3%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
44%Possession49%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
1.09xG for1.44
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
1.75xG against1.17
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca

Shooting quality

Juan Pablo II College: Counter-attackingUTC Cajamarca: Balanced
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
Accuracy (shots on target)38%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Juan Pablo II College is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Juan Pablo II College · 1 pts / game - UTC Cajamarca

Juan Pablo II College
WWWLL
Season result split
38% W13% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-4
1.25 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-2
Last 5 at home
1-1-2
DLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
UTC Cajamarca
DLWLD
Season result split
50% W25% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-2
1.75 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-1
Last 5 away
2-1-1
WDWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Juan Pablo II College is 18% better for: goals scored per game.

1.63 goals / game - Juan Pablo II College · 1.38 goals / game - UTC Cajamarca

UTC Cajamarca is 121% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.5 goals / game - Juan Pablo II College · 1.13 goals / game - UTC Cajamarca

Juan Pablo II College scoring profile: very strong

Juan Pablo II College scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 meczów), while UTC Cajamarca keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 meczów).

UTC Cajamarca scoring profile: very strong

UTC Cajamarca scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 meczów), while Juan Pablo II College keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 8 meczów).

13Goals scored (season)11
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
20Goals conceded (season)9
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
4.13Average goals per game2.5
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
9Goals scored (last 5)5
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
9Goals conceded (last 5)7
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal75%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
63%2 goals50%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
25%3 goals13%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
0%4 goals0%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal75%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
75%2 goals38%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
38%3 goals0%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
13%4 goals0%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

75%
Juan Pablo II College - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.6 of 8 meczów
57%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time25%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
0%BTTS in both halves13%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
25%Scored in both halves38%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca

BTTS and goal count

75%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
80%BTTS - last 560%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

1st half

88%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
75%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

UTC Cajamarca is 119% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.63 pts / game - Juan Pablo II College · 1.38 pts / game - UTC Cajamarca

Juan Pablo II College - half-time state
13% leading25% draw63% trailing
UTC Cajamarca - half-time state
25% leading63% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.63Points per game (1st half)1.38
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
1.13Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
1.63Average goals (1st half)0.88
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
25%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
63%No goal before half-time50%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per game (2nd half)1.88
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
1.13Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
1.38Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
2.5Average goals (2nd half)1.63
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
25%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca
38%No goal after half-time38%
Juan Pablo II CollegeUTC Cajamarca

Juan Pablo II College - second-half results

50% W0% R50% P
5
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.63
PPG before half-time
Lead holding292%

Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

UTC Cajamarca - second-half results

63% W0% R38% P
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Juan Pablo II College - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.80
Goals scored / game0.61.2
Goals allowed / game0.81.0
Average goals per game1.42.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
UTC Cajamarca - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.20
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game0.81.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Juan Pablo II College
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
1
4
16-30
1
4
31-45
3
2
46-60
1
4
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

UTC Cajamarca
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
3
16-30
2
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.32
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
126%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Juan Pablo II College

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.66
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.54
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.75
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
250%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

UTC Cajamarca

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
138%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
69%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.75
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
55% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
55%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

Juan Pablo II CollegeLigaUTC Cajamarca
Average goals per game 4.132.63 2.50
Both teams scored 75%57% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%51% 38%
Clean sheets 0%26% 25%
Goal before half-time 88%65% 63%
Goal after half-time 100%81% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.63
Average goals per game
57%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.63
Home goals / game
1.00
Away goals / game
+63%
Home attack advantage
+39%
Home defensive advantage
+30%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Juan Pablo II CollegeGoalPaolo Fuentes Varcárcel
  2. UTC CajamarcaYellow cardBruno Ezequiel Duarte
  3. Juan Pablo II CollegeYellow cardJack Kevin Durán Abán
  4. UTC CajamarcaYellow cardMarcos Alexander Lliuya Campos
  5. UTC CajamarcaYellow cardDylan Pave Caro Salas
  6. UTC CajamarcaYellow cardCarlos Junior Huerto Saavedra
  7. UTC CajamarcaYellow cardGilmar Alonso Paredes Esquives
  8. Juan Pablo II CollegeYellow cardPaolo Fuentes Varcárcel
  9. UTC CajamarcaRed cardPiero Serra
  10. UTC CajamarcaYellow cardMichael Ademir Rasmussen Grados

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Juan Pablo II College's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against UTC Cajamarca. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

CCyD Universidad Técnica de Cajamarca
0 : 0
Juan Pablo II College
Juan Pablo II College
4 : 2
CCyD Universidad Técnica de Cajamarca

FAQ

What was the result of Juan Pablo II College vs UTC Cajamarca?

The Primera División match finished Juan Pablo II College 2:1 UTC Cajamarca. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Juan Pablo II College and UTC Cajamarca?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Juan Pablo II College won 1, UTC Cajamarca won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Juan Pablo II College vs UTC Cajamarca?

Juan Pablo II College score 1.63 goals per game on average and UTC Cajamarca 1.38. The Primera División average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Juan Pablo II College's matches and 50% of UTC Cajamarca's.

What form are Juan Pablo II College and UTC Cajamarca in?

Over the last 5 games Juan Pablo II College have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and UTC Cajamarca 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Juan Pablo II College vs UTC Cajamarca?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Juan Pablo II College vs UTC Cajamarca: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.