Jubilo Iwata vs Kataller Toyama: match statistics
Jubilo Iwata vs Kataller Toyama: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Jubilo Iwata played against Kataller Toyama in J2 League (Japan). The game was played on September 6, 2026. Venue: Yamaha Stadium. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Jubilo Iwata has 2 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.75 points per game. Kataller Toyama has 2 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.50 points per game.
Scoring records
Jubilo Iwata scores 1.75 goals per game and allows 1.50. Kataller Toyama scores 2.50 and allows 1.25. Games in this league average 2.73 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 100% of Jubilo Iwata's games and 25% of Kataller Toyama's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 75%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kataller Toyama has the higher season xG average, 2.46 to 1.57 per game. Jubilo Iwata takes 13.3 shots per game, while Kataller Toyama takes 22.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Jubilo Iwata leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Kataller Toyama leads at halftime in 50% and scores 1.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Jubilo Iwata's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). For Kataller Toyama, it is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
J2 League games average 2.73 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kataller Toyama hold a slight edge in chance creation quality: away from home, they average xG 2.54 compared with Jubilo Iwata’s 1.75 at home, while also recording 21.5 shots per match versus the hosts’ 15.5. The visitors score an average of 2.0 goals away from home, while Jubilo average 1.5 at home, with both teams conceding 1.0 goal per game. Toyama’s defense also looks stronger from a chance-quality perspective, allowing xG 0.94 compared with Jubilo’s 1.05, and they have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their away matches. However, Jubilo remain unbeaten at home and have taken points in both of their home matches so far, meaning the draw remains a significant risk. Despite the weaker record of two defeats in their last five matches, the visitors’ greater attacking intensity and xG advantage marginally favor an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Jubilo Iwata recorded BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 1.4 goals and conceding 1.4, which points to consistently open game scenarios. Kataller Toyama average 2.0 goals both across the season and in their last five outings, while their xG stands at a high 2.30, suggesting they should create chances away from home as well. The hosts generate a further 1.60 xG in their recent matches, while Toyama concede an average of 1.8 goals per game, despite their average xG conceded remaining low at 0.97. The signal is not clear-cut, as Toyama recorded BTTS in only 20% of their last five matches and kept a clean sheet in 50% of their league games. However, the attacking potential of both sides provides the edge, making it slightly more likely that each team will score at least once.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The goal profile of both teams is clearly above the league average of 2.78 goals: Jubilo Iwata have recorded a combined average of 2.8 goals in their last five matches, while Kataller Toyama have reached as high as 3.8. During this period, the hosts averaged 1.4 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, whereas the visitors scored 2.0 and allowed 1.8 goals. Their creative potential also points towards an open game, with average xG of 1.60 for Jubilo and 2.30 for Toyama. At least two goals have been scored in every match played by both teams so far this season, making Over 1.5 goals the strongest selection, although the Over 2.5 goals line also has positive indicators.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Jubilo Iwata has strong arguments to take the lead before half-time: over their last five matches, they have averaged 1.0 goals scored in the first half and conceded just 0.4, while Kataller Toyama conceded an average of 1.0 goal before the break during the same period. The visitors went into half-time trailing in 60% of their last five matches, further supporting the scenario of a home lead after 45 minutes. After the break, however, the picture changes significantly, as Jubilo averaged just 0.4 goals and lost the second half in 80% of their matches, while Toyama scored 1.2 goals and won the second half in 60% of cases. Kataller also have higher season-long average xG, 2.54 compared with 2.38, as well as lower xG conceded, 0.94 compared with 1.22. The strongest signal is therefore a Jubilo lead at half-time, followed by a turnaround as the more effective visitors after the break come back into the game.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Jubilo Iwata | Kataller Toyama | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Jubilo Iwata is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.75 pts / game - Jubilo Iwata · 1.5 pts / game - Kataller Toyama
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kataller Toyama is 43% better for: goals scored per game.
1.75 goals / game - Jubilo Iwata · 2.5 goals / game - Kataller Toyama
Kataller Toyama is 20% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.5 goals / game - Jubilo Iwata · 1.25 goals / game - Kataller Toyama
Jubilo Iwata scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 games), while Kataller Toyama keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 games).
Kataller Toyama scores in 75% of games (3 of 4 games), while Jubilo Iwata keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Jubilo Iwata
Over / Under - Kataller Toyama
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Jubilo Iwata is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.75 pts / game - Jubilo Iwata · 1.5 pts / game - Kataller Toyama
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Jubilo Iwata - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Kataller Toyama - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.75 | 0.75 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.3 | 0.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.5 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 25% |
| 3 goals | 25% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 25% |
| No goal | 25% | 50% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.50 | 2.25 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.3 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 25% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 75% |
| No goal | 25% | 25% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Jubilo Iwata
Kataller Toyama
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J2 League).
Teams vs league
| Jubilo Iwata | Liga | Kataller Toyama | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.25 | 2.73 | ▲ 3.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 44% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 75% | 52% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 33% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 71% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 81% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Jubilo Iwata's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Kataller Toyama. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Jubilo Iwata vs Kataller Toyama?
The J2 League match finished Jubilo Iwata 0:1 Kataller Toyama. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Jubilo Iwata and Kataller Toyama?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Jubilo Iwata won 1, Kataller Toyama won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Jubilo Iwata vs Kataller Toyama?
Jubilo Iwata score 1.75 goals per game on average and Kataller Toyama 2.50. The J2 League average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Jubilo Iwata's matches and 25% of Kataller Toyama's.
What form are Jubilo Iwata and Kataller Toyama in?
Over the last 5 games Jubilo Iwata have a 2-1-1 record (1.75 points per game) and Kataller Toyama 2-0-2 (1.50 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Jubilo Iwata vs Kataller Toyama?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


