Juve Stabia vs Catanzaro: match statistics
Juve Stabia vs Catanzaro: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Juve Stabia played against Catanzaro in Serie B (Italy). The game was played on April 18, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Juve Stabia has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Catanzaro has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Juve Stabia scores 1.21 goals per game and allows 1.21. Catanzaro scores 1.56 and allows 1.24. Games in this league average 2.56 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 53% of Juve Stabia's games and 65% of Catanzaro's. The Over 2.5 rates are 47% and 53%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Catanzaro has the higher season xG average, 1.37 to 1.31 per game. Juve Stabia takes 12.1 shots per game, while Catanzaro takes 12.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Juve Stabia leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.53 goals per game after halftime. Catanzaro leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.88 after halftime.
When the teams score
Juve Stabia's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). For Catanzaro, it is minutes 46-60 (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie B games average 2.56 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (Juve Stabia). Their defense concedes only 0.76 goals per home game on average and they have a 53% clean sheet rate at home, while Catanzaro concede 1.41 goals away on average and register just an 18% clean sheet rate. Juve also generate more high-quality chances at home (xG 1.49 vs 1.33 xG for Catanzaro away) and average 4.41 shots on target per match; in the last 5 games the hosts have 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, averaging 1.6 points per game. The visitors, however, have a better season record (14 wins and 53 goals vs the hosts’ 11 wins and 41 goals) and a higher shot conversion rate on the road (12% vs 10%), so they can punish individual errors. Considering the defensive edge and higher xG for the home side plus superior form (1.6 vs 1.2 points per game in the last 5), I assess the probabilities as: Juve win 60%, draw 25%, Catanzaro win 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show strong signals for BTTS: this season Juve Stabia has 59% matches with both teams scoring, Catanzaro 71%, and the league average is 55%. In the last 5 fixtures the rates are even stronger: Juve Stabia 80% and Catanzaro 100%, yielding a short-term average of 90%. Offensive and defensive metrics confirm the risk of goals from both sides — Juve averages 13.76 shots (4.47 on target) with xG 1.42, Catanzaro 12.0 shots (4.06 on target) with xG 1.33, and over the last 5 matches the teams concede on average 1.4 and 1.6 goals respectively. Clean sheets are rare, particularly for the away side: 35% for the home team versus 18% for Catanzaro, which further increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. Considering a seasonal BTTS average of 65% and strong last-5 form (average 90%), I estimate 82% for 'BTTS - Yes' and 18% for 'No', therefore recommendation: 'Yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model indicates total xG around 2.83: 1.50 for Juve Stabia (attacking xG 1.42 vs Catanzaro’s average xG conceded 1.58) and 1.33 for Catanzaro (attacking xG 1.33 vs hosts’ defense 1.33). Season-long stats show Juve Stabia have Over 1.5 in 76% of matches and Catanzaro in 82%, yielding an average 79% chance of Over 1.5 in this fixture. In the last 5 matches both teams had Over 2.5 in 60% of games, and BTTS in the last 5 is 80% (home) and 100% (away), which increases the likelihood of further goals. On the 2.5 line season Over rates are 41% vs 65% (home vs away) — therefore I assess Over 2.5 at about 56%; Over 3.5 has only around a 38% chance (35% vs 41%) and does not offer sufficient edge. In summary, the strongest and most reliable signal is Over 1.5 given the high 76%/82% seasonal rates and the projected xG of 2.83.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Juve Stabia led at the break in 41% of their matches, while Catanzaro were leading away in 35% of fixtures, suggesting a home advantage in the first half (approximately 38%). The hosts rarely lose at home — only 6% of home games, with 47% wins and 47% draws — so a lead at the 45-minute mark generally gives them a secure position. Juve score on average 0.94 goals after the break and concede only 0.41 in second halves, winning the second half in 53% of cases; meanwhile Catanzaro have average xG against of 1.58 and concede on average 0.94 goals after the break, which increases the risk of a turnaround for the visitors. Additionally, the hosts average 0.71 goals by half-time and 76% of their matches see at least one goal before the break, while the visitors win only 35% of away matches and concede on average 1.41 goals per game — this bolsters the odds that Juve will hold their lead. As a result, the most likely scenario is Juve leading at half-time and ultimately winning as hosts (1/1) — I assess this at about 27%, with alternatives: draw at half-time and Juve win (X/1) ~17% and draw/draw (X/X) ~10%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Juve Stabia | Catanzaro | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Juve Stabia is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Juve Stabia · 1.2 pts / game - Catanzaro
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Catanzaro is 29% better for: goals scored per game.
1.21 goals / game - Juve Stabia · 1.56 goals / game - Catanzaro
Juve Stabia scores in 74% of games (25 of 34 meczów), while Catanzaro keeps a clean sheet in 26% (9 of 34 meczów).
Catanzaro scores in 82% of games (28 of 34 meczów), while Juve Stabia keeps a clean sheet in 32% (11 of 34 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Juve Stabia
Over / Under - Catanzaro
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Juve Stabia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 32%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Catanzaro - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 41%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 0% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Juve Stabia
Catanzaro
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie B).
Teams vs league
| Juve Stabia | Liga | Catanzaro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.41 | 2.56 | ▲ 2.79 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 53% | 55% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 47% | 49% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 32% | 26% | • 26% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 76% | 71% | ▲ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 65% | 77% | ▲ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Juve Stabia's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Catanzaro. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Juve Stabia vs Catanzaro?
The Serie B match finished Juve Stabia 1:1 Catanzaro. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Juve Stabia vs Catanzaro?
Juve Stabia score 1.21 goals per game on average and Catanzaro 1.56. The Serie B average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Juve Stabia's matches and 65% of Catanzaro's.
What form are Juve Stabia and Catanzaro in?
Over the last 5 games Juve Stabia have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Catanzaro 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Juve Stabia vs Catanzaro?
The statistical background for Juve Stabia vs Catanzaro — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


