Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildAkureyrarvöllurData current as of August 31, 2026

KA vs Fram: match statistics

KA crest
KA
3 : 4half-time 2:3
Fram crest
Fram

KA vs Fram: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

KA played against Fram in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The game was played on June 15, 2026. Venue: Akureyrarvöllur. Final score: 3:4.

Recent form

KA has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Fram has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.

Scoring records

KA scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 1.67. Fram scores 2.78 and allows 1.78. Games in this league average 4.02 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 56% of KA's games and 78% of Fram's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 78%, compared with league averages of 72% for BTTS and 74% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Fram has the higher season xG average, 2.12 to 1.68 per game. KA takes 15.0 shots per game, while Fram takes 17.8.

First-half and second-half trends

KA leads at halftime in 11% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Fram leads at halftime in 33% and scores 1.67 after halftime.

When the teams score

KA's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For Fram, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Úrvalsdeild games average 4.02 goals. Both teams score in 72% of games, and 74% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Fram is the favorite for this fixture: the visitors have scored 25 goals this season versus KA’s 12 and have netted 14 goals in the last 5 matches compared to KA’s 8 in the same period. Average xG indicates Fram’s advantage — 2.04 per match (away) versus KA’s 1.53 at home, and shot conversion rates are 10% for Fram and 7% for KA, with an average of 5.5 shots on target per match against 4. Defensively the gap is narrower — KA concedes 1.6 goals at home, Fram concedes 1.5 away, but xG against is 1.54 for KA versus 1.26 for Fram, suggesting Fram allows fewer high-quality chances. Fram also holds a significantly better recent points form: 2.6 points per match in the last 5 fixtures versus 1.2 for KA, while the hosts win only 20% of home games and lose 80%; therefore I predict an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

KA has a seasonal goals average of 3.6 and concedes 2.0 per match, while Fram scores 1.75 and concedes 1.5, indicating both teams have goal-scoring potential. Seasonal BTTS rate is 100% for KA and 50% for Fram, with a league BTTS level of 71%, so the overall league context and especially KA’s home matches strongly favor a Goal/Goal outcome. In the last 5 matches KA had BTTS in 60% of games and Fram in 80%, with last-5 averages: KA 1.6 vs Fram 2.8 goals scored and average goals conceded 1.8 vs 2.0, showing both sides have regularly traded goals in recent form. Additionally xG is similar (KA 2.19 vs Fram 2.04), KA registers more shots on target (7.4 vs 5.5) and has a higher conversion rate (20% vs 10%), while KA has no clean sheets this season (0%), which increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Considering these figures and the league goals average of 4.02, I assess BTTS - Yes probability at 78% vs 22% and recommend the bet: yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG: KA has xG_for 2.19 and xG_against vs Fram of 1.26, yielding expected home goals of about (2.19+1.26)/2 ≈ 1.73; Fram has xG_for 2.04 and xG_against vs KA 1.45, giving expected away goals ≈ 1.75, total ≈ 3.48. This aligns with seasonal averages: KA scores at home on average 3.6 goals, Fram away 1.75 (combined 5.35), and the league averages 4.02 goals per match, all favoring an elevated goal count. Additionally KA has 100% of home matches over 2.5 goals, and in the last 5 matches the over 2.5 rate is 60% for KA and 80% for Fram; KA’s BTTS is 100%, which strengthens the over signal. Consequently the strongest and most justified pick is Over on the 2.5 line (I assess over2.5 ≈78% vs under2.5 22%), while Over1.5 is nearly certain (96%), and Over3.5 remains moderate (60%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The primary scenario is 1/1: KA led at the break in 3 of 5 home matches (60%) and scores an average of 1.6 goals by half-time versus 0.5 for Fram, which strongly favors the home side leading after 45 minutes. KA wins at home in 80% of matches and has a seasonal goals-per-game average of 3.6 and xG of 2.19 compared to 2.04 for Fram; with a shot conversion rate of 20% (vs 10% for Fram) the hosts convert chances into goals more effectively. If KA leads at half-time the data suggest they hold the lead — the hosts average 2.2 points when leading at the break versus 0.75 for Fram and have a +5 goal difference at half-time, so I assumed that an HT lead translates into a win in roughly 75% of cases (hence 1/1 = 45% in the distribution). A turnaround risk exists because Fram are in form (guests' last 5: W W D W W, 80% wins), so with a draw at half-time I assigned a 20% chance that KA wins after the break, 14% for a Full-Time draw and 6% for a Fram victory from a draw. In summary: a strong HT signal toward KA (60% leads) and higher conversion efficiency make 1/1 the most reasonable pick with the highest weight of 45%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 3
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

55Possession (%)45
KAFram
12Shots20
KAFram
6Shots on target10
KAFram
1.56xG2.29
KAFram
6Corners5
KAFram
53Dangerous attacks47
KAFram
11Fouls18
KAFram
2Cards4
KAFram

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.33Goals scored / game2.78
KAFram
1.67Goals allowed / game1.78
KAFram
47%Average possession47%
KAFram
4.56Shots on target / game6.56
KAFram

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

15Shots per game17.78
KAFram
4.56Shots on target6.56
KAFram
8.9%Shot conversion15.6%
KAFram
47%Possession47%
KAFram
1.68xG for2.12
KAFram
1.79xG against1.37
KAFram

Shooting quality

KA: AttackingFram: Counter-attacking
KAFram
Accuracy (shots on target)30%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Fram is 44% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - KA · 2.6 pts / game - Fram

KA
WWWLL
Season result split
33% W11% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-5
1.11 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-4
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.88Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Fram
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
67% W22% R11% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-1
2.22 pts / game · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-1
Last 5 away
2-1-1
LWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 2.31Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fram is 109% better for: goals scored per game.

1.33 goals / game - KA · 2.78 goals / game - Fram

KA is 7% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.67 goals / game - KA · 1.78 goals / game - Fram

KA scoring profile: very strong

KA scores in 78% of games (7 of 9 meczów), while Fram keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 meczów).

Fram scoring profile: very strong

Fram scores in 89% of games (8 of 9 meczów), while KA keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 meczów).

12Goals scored (season)25
KAFram
15Goals conceded (season)16
KAFram
3Average goals per game4.56
KAFram
8Goals scored (last 5)14
KAFram
7Goals conceded (last 5)10
KAFram

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal89%
KAFram
44%2 goals78%
KAFram
11%3 goals67%
KAFram
0%4 goals33%
KAFram

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal89%
KAFram
44%2 goals56%
KAFram
22%3 goals33%
KAFram
11%4 goals0%
KAFram

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time44%
KAFram
11%BTTS in both halves22%
KAFram
22%Scored in both halves67%
KAFram

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS78%
KAFram
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
KAFram
40%BTTS - last 580%
KAFram

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
KAFram
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time56%
KAFram
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
KAFram

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
KAFram
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
KAFram
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time56%
KAFram

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fram is 133% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.67 pts / game - KA · 1.56 pts / game - Fram

KA - half-time state
11% leading33% draw56% trailing
Fram - half-time state
33% leading56% draw11% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.67Points per game (1st half)1.56
KAFram
0.33Goals scored (1st half)1.11
KAFram
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.78
KAFram
1.33Average goals (1st half)1.89
KAFram
33%Clean sheet before half-time56%
KAFram
67%No goal before half-time33%
KAFram

After half-time (2nd half)

1.89Points per game (2nd half)1.89
KAFram
1Goals scored (2nd half)1.67
KAFram
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)1
KAFram
1.67Average goals (2nd half)2.67
KAFram
56%Clean sheet after half-time33%
KAFram
33%No goal after half-time11%
KAFram

KA - second-half results

56% W22% R22% P
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at halftime in 11% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Fram - second-half results

56% W22% R22% P
14
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding203%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

KA - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.802.60
Goals scored / game0.21.4
Goals allowed / game1.00.4
Average goals per game1.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-4+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Fram - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.202.00
Goals scored / game1.41.4
Goals allowed / game1.40.6
Average goals per game2.82.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal20%0%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

KA
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
1
1
16-30
2
5
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Fram
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
0
0
16-30
4
3
31-45
5
4
46-60
3
3
61-75
7
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.78
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 2.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-34%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

KA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
42% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
42%

Fram

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.75
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
148%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

KALigaFram
Average goals per game 3.004.02 4.56
Both teams scored 56%72% 78%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%74% 78%
Clean sheets 22%15% 11%
Goal before half-time 78%83% 67%
Goal after half-time 89%90% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

4.02
Average goals per game
72%
Both teams scored
74%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
15%
Clean sheets
2.14
Home goals / game
1.88
Away goals / game
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defensive advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
12%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
90%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
43%
3 goals
19%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from KA's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Fram. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

KA Akureyri
2 : 0
Fram Reykjavík
Fram Reykjavík
1 : 2
KA Akureyri

FAQ

What was the result of KA vs Fram?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished KA 3:4 Fram. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KA and Fram?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches KA won 2, Fram won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KA vs Fram?

KA score 1.33 goals per game on average and Fram 2.78. The Úrvalsdeild average is 4.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 74% of games. Both teams score in 56% of KA's matches and 78% of Fram's.

What form are KA and Fram in?

Over the last 5 games KA have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Fram 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KA vs Fram?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KA vs Fram: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.