KA vs ÍBV: match statistics
KA vs ÍBV: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KA played against ÍBV in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The game was played on May 10, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
KA has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. ÍBV has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.
Scoring records
KA scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.60. ÍBV scores 1.20 and allows 3.20. Games in this league average 4.06 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 60% of KA's games and 100% of ÍBV's. The Over 2.5 rates are 40% and 80%, compared with league averages of 74% for BTTS and 77% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KA has the higher season xG average, 1.51 to 1.43 per game. KA takes 13.8 shots per game, while ÍBV takes 12.2.
First-half and second-half trends
KA leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. ÍBV leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.60 after halftime.
When the teams score
KA's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). For ÍBV, it is minutes 61-75 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Úrvalsdeild games average 4.06 goals. Both teams score in 74% of games, and 77% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1): KA shows a clear defensive edge and superior recent metrics — conceding an average of 2.33 goals per home game versus ÍBV’s 3.5 conceded on the road. Form difference is evident over the last 5 matches: KA conceded 8 and scored 5, while ÍBV conceded 16 and scored 6; KA averages 0.8 points per game in the last 5 fixtures compared to 0.2 for ÍBV. Quality-of-chances analysis shows nearly equal xG (1.43 for KA vs 1.42 for ÍBV), but KA attempts more shots (13.67 vs 12) and more shots on target (4 vs 3), with conversion rates of 7% vs 8%. Although ÍBV has greater possession (55% vs 45%), that advantage does not translate into better defensive outcomes or goal difference (home/away goal difference: KA -4 vs ÍBV -5); neither team has kept a clean sheet yet (0). Considering KA’s lower susceptibility to conceding and stronger recent indicators, the home side appears the favorite in this matchup.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The Both Teams To Score scenario is highly likely — both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 100% and 0% clean sheets this season. Average xG are virtually identical: 1.43 for KA versus 1.42 for ÍBV, and the league average goals is 4.06, indicating open matches with many opportunities. Defensively both sides underperform: KA concedes 3.0 goals per match on average, ÍBV 3.5, with ÍBV conceding 3.2 on average over the last 5 matches. KA averages about 4.67 shots on target per game versus ÍBV’s 3.0 and has a higher conversion rate (11% vs 8%), so both sides have a real scoring capability; additionally the league BTTS is 74% and over 2.5 frequently occurs. Considering these figures (both season BTTS 100%, 0% CS, xG ~1.43/1.42, average concessions 3.0/3.5), I tip BTTS - Yes with an estimated probability of ~90%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and defensive analysis yield approximately 1.64 expected goals for KA (xG for KA attack 1.43 vs xG conceded by opponent 1.85) and 1.57 for ÍBV (xG for ÍBV attack 1.42 vs xG conceded to KA 1.71), totaling ~3.21 goals. Seasonally both teams have 100% of matches with over 1.5 goals and 100% BTTS, while the league averages 4.06 goals per game — a strong signal for Over. A Poisson model with lambda=3.21 indicates ~62% probability of at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and ~40% for at least 4 goals (Over 3.5), consistent with historical Over 2.5 rates: 67% for KA and 100% for ÍBV. Additionally, KA averages 4.67 SOT with an 11% conversion rate, ÍBV averages 3.0 SOT with an 8% conversion, and ÍBV has conceded 16 goals versus 8 conceded by KA, pointing to an open match with many chances. The strongest and safest signal is Over 1.5 (seasonally 100% for both teams and expected 3.21 goals), hence the recommendation to play over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The home team are moderate favorites to win: season average goals for KA is 1.33 versus 1.00 for ÍBV, and the visitors have a 0% win rate and 100% losses in current statistics, which increases the chances of a home victory. The HT advantage for KA stems from the fact that the home side led at the break in 33% of matches, while ÍBV have never led at the break (0%); KA average 0.67 goals in the first half compared to 0.50 for the visitors, and first-half points average 1.33 vs 0.5. Both teams’ xG are practically equal (1.43 vs 1.42), but both have high xG against (1.71 vs 1.85) and over the season both sides have scored and conceded in 100% of matches, so I expect goals from both teams. In the last 5 matches KA have a 20% win rate versus 0% for ÍBV, and although ÍBV scored more first-half goals in their last 5 games (11 vs 6), this has not translated into wins. The sum of these signals — better HT stats for KA (33% vs 0%), higher season goals average (1.33 vs 1.00) and weaker form of the visitors — indicates the most likely scenario is KA leading at half-time and KA winning at full-time (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KA | ÍBV | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
KA is 300% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - KA · 0.2 pts / game - ÍBV
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
ÍBV is 20% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - KA · 1.2 goals / game - ÍBV
KA is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.6 goals / game - KA · 3.2 goals / game - ÍBV
KA scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 meczów), while ÍBV keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 meczów).
ÍBV scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 meczów), while KA keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KA
Over / Under - ÍBV
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
ÍBV is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.6 pts / game - KA · 1 pts / game - ÍBV
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KA - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
ÍBV - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KA
ÍBV
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).
Teams vs league
| KA | Liga | ÍBV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.60 | 4.06 | ▲ 4.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 60% | 74% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 77% | ▲ 80% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 20% | 14% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 83% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 89% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from KA's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against ÍBV. Games average 2.67 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of KA vs ÍBV?
The Úrvalsdeild match finished KA 2:0 ÍBV. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between KA and ÍBV?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches KA won 2, ÍBV won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before KA vs ÍBV?
KA score 1.00 goals per game on average and ÍBV 1.20. The Úrvalsdeild average is 4.06 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 77% of games. Both teams score in 60% of KA's matches and 100% of ÍBV's.
What form are KA and ÍBV in?
Over the last 5 games KA have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and ÍBV 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KA vs ÍBV?
The statistical background for KA vs ÍBV — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.