Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildData current as of 22 July 2026

KA vs ÍBV: match statistics

KA crest
KA
2 : 0half-time 1:0
ÍBV crest
ÍBV

KA vs ÍBV: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KA play ÍBV in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match date is 10 May 2026 at 18:30. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

KA: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. ÍBV: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

KA scores 1.60 and concedes 2.13 goals per match. ÍBV scores 1.73 and concedes 2.20. League average: 4.04 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KA 73%, ÍBV 80%. Over 2.5: KA 67%, ÍBV 67%. League level: BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 73%.

xG, shots and style

KA has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.35. KA: 14.6 shots per match, ÍBV: 11.7.

Match halves

KA: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.07. ÍBV: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

KA: 76-90+ (7 goals). ÍBV: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Úrvalsdeild: 4.04 goals per match, BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 73%.

Head-to-head

4 H2H matches: 2-2-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Match description

I predict a home win (1): KA shows a clear defensive edge and superior recent metrics — conceding an average of 2.33 goals per home game versus ÍBV’s 3.5 conceded on the road. Form difference is evident over the last 5 matches: KA conceded 8 and scored 5, while ÍBV conceded 16 and scored 6; KA averages 0.8 points per game in the last 5 fixtures compared to 0.2 for ÍBV. Quality-of-chances analysis shows nearly equal xG (1.43 for KA vs 1.42 for ÍBV), but KA attempts more shots (13.67 vs 12) and more shots on target (4 vs 3), with conversion rates of 7% vs 8%. Although ÍBV has greater possession (55% vs 45%), that advantage does not translate into better defensive outcomes or goal difference (home/away goal difference: KA -4 vs ÍBV -5); neither team has kept a clean sheet yet (0). Considering KA’s lower susceptibility to conceding and stronger recent indicators, the home side appears the favorite in this matchup.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
KAÍBV
14Shots9
KAÍBV
4Shots on target1
KAÍBV
1.42xG0.89
KAÍBV
5Corners5
KAÍBV
36Dangerous attacks35
KAÍBV
12Fouls12
KAÍBV
2Cards2
KAÍBV

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.6Goals scored / match1.73
KAÍBV
2.13Goals conceded / match2.2
KAÍBV
45%Average possession48%
KAÍBV
5.07Shots on target / match4.13
KAÍBV

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.6Shots per match11.67
KAÍBV
5.07Shots on target4.13
KAÍBV
11%Shot conversion14.9%
KAÍBV
45%Possession48%
KAÍBV
1.66xG for1.35
KAÍBV
1.98xG against1.56
KAÍBV

Shooting quality

KA: AttackingÍBV: Efficient finishing
KAÍBV
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

ÍBV is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - KA · 1.6 pts / match - ÍBV

KA
LLLWD
Season result split
27% W13% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-9
0.93 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-5
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 2.26BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
ÍBV
WDWLD
Season result split
27% W27% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-7
1.07 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

ÍBV is 8% better for: goals scored per match.

1.6 goals / match - KA · 1.73 goals / match - ÍBV

KA scoring profile: very strong

KA scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while ÍBV keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 15 matches).

ÍBV scoring profile: very strong

ÍBV scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while KA keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).

24Goals scored (season)26
KAÍBV
32Goals conceded (season)33
KAÍBV
3.73Average goals in match3.93
KAÍBV
9Goals scored (last 5)8
KAÍBV
13Goals conceded (last 5)9
KAÍBV

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal87%
KAÍBV
53%2 goals47%
KAÍBV
20%3 goals13%
KAÍBV
0%4 goals13%
KAÍBV

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal93%
KAÍBV
67%2 goals60%
KAÍBV
40%3 goals20%
KAÍBV
13%4 goals20%
KAÍBV

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time27%
KAÍBV
13%BTTS in both halves7%
KAÍBV
27%Scored in both halves20%
KAÍBV

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
KAÍBV
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
KAÍBV
100%BTTS - last 580%
KAÍBV

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
KAÍBV
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time53%
KAÍBV
27%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
KAÍBV

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
KAÍBV
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
KAÍBV
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
KAÍBV

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

ÍBV is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.87 pts / match - KA · 1.13 pts / match - ÍBV

KA - half-time state
20% leading27% draw53% trailing
ÍBV - half-time state
27% leading33% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.87Points per match (1st half)1.13
KAÍBV
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.73
KAÍBV
1.07Goals conceded (1st half)0.93
KAÍBV
1.6Average goals (1st half)1.67
KAÍBV
33%Clean sheet before half-time40%
KAÍBV
60%No goal before half-time53%
KAÍBV

After half-time (2nd half)

1.47Points per match (2nd half)1.07
KAÍBV
1.07Goals scored (2nd half)1
KAÍBV
1.07Goals conceded (2nd half)1.27
KAÍBV
2.13Average goals (2nd half)2.27
KAÍBV
33%Clean sheet after half-time20%
KAÍBV
27%No goal after half-time40%
KAÍBV

KA - second-half results

40% W27% R33% P
13
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.87
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

ÍBV - second-half results

27% W27% R47% P
17
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.81.8
Average goals in match1.43.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
ÍBV - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KA
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
3
3
16-30
3
8
31-45
3
4
46-60
6
4
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

ÍBV
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
4
7
16-30
3
3
31-45
4
9
46-60
5
5
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
77%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-22%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
76%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

ÍBV

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.64
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

KALigaÍBV
Average goals in match 3.734.04 3.93
Both teams scored 73%74% 80%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%73% 67%
Clean sheets 13%14% 7%
Goal before half-time 80%82% 80%
Goal after half-time 93%88% 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

4.04
Average goals per match
74%
Both teams scored
73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
14%
Clean sheets
2.21
Home goals / match
1.84
Away goals / match
+20%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
14%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
65%
2 goals
43%
3 goals
21%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): KA 2 - 2 - 0 ÍBV. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

ÍBV
2 : 2
KA
ÍB Vestmannaeyja
3 : 4
KA Akureyri
KA Akureyri
1 : 0
ÍB Vestmannaeyja
ÍB Vestmannaeyja
0 : 0
KA Akureyri

FAQ

What was the result of KA vs ÍBV?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished KA 2:0 ÍBV. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KA and ÍBV?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches KA won 2, ÍBV won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KA vs ÍBV?

KA score 1.60 goals per game on average and ÍBV 1.73. The Úrvalsdeild average is 4.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 73% of KA's matches and 80% of ÍBV's.

What form are KA and ÍBV in?

Over the last 5 games KA have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and ÍBV 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KA vs ÍBV?

The statistical background for KA vs ÍBV — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.