KAA Gent II vs Patro Eisden: match statistics
Patro Eisden presents decidedly better form and statistics in away matches. The visitors have an impressive 42% win rate away and a positive goal difference (+5), while KAA Gent II wins only 25% of cases in home matches with a -6 balance. A key factor is Patro Eisden's advantage in average xG (1.79 vs 1.54) and higher scoring efficiency (1.5 goals per away match versus 1.08 for the hosts). Form over the last five matches also argues for the visitors (1.6 PPG vs 1.2 PPG). The hosts have lost 3 of their last 5 matches, further weakening their position. All indicators point to an advantage for Patro Eisden, though the poor efficiency of both teams in keeping clean sheets suggests an exciting match.
KAA Gent II vs Patro Eisden: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KAA Gent II played against Patro Eisden in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on February 27, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
KAA Gent II has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Patro Eisden has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
KAA Gent II scores 1.38 goals per game and allows 1.38. Patro Eisden scores 1.44 and allows 1.20. Games in this league average 2.75 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of KAA Gent II's games and 52% of Patro Eisden's. The Over 2.5 rates are 54% and 44%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Patro Eisden has the higher season xG average, 1.70 to 1.57 per game. KAA Gent II takes 13.0 shots per game, while Patro Eisden takes 15.4.
First-half and second-half trends
KAA Gent II leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.63 goals per game after halftime. Patro Eisden leads at halftime in 36% and scores 0.80 after halftime.
When the teams score
KAA Gent II's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (9 goals). For Patro Eisden, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division B games average 2.75 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Patro Eisden presents decidedly better form and statistics in away matches. The visitors have an impressive 42% win rate away and a positive goal difference (+5), while KAA Gent II wins only 25% of cases in home matches with a -6 balance. A key factor is Patro Eisden's advantage in average xG (1.79 vs 1.54) and higher scoring efficiency (1.5 goals per away match versus 1.08 for the hosts). Form over the last five matches also argues for the visitors (1.6 PPG vs 1.2 PPG). The hosts have lost 3 of their last 5 matches, further weakening their position. All indicators point to an advantage for Patro Eisden, though the poor efficiency of both teams in keeping clean sheets suggests an exciting match.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KAA Gent II | Patro Eisden | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Patro Eisden is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - KAA Gent II · 1.6 pts / game - Patro Eisden
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Patro Eisden is 15% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.38 goals / game - KAA Gent II · 1.2 goals / game - Patro Eisden
KAA Gent II scores in 67% of games (16 of 24 meczów), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 32% (8 of 25 meczów).
Patro Eisden scores in 72% of games (18 of 25 meczów), while KAA Gent II keeps a clean sheet in 25% (6 of 24 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KAA Gent II
Over / Under - Patro Eisden
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KAA Gent II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Patro Eisden - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KAA Gent II
Patro Eisden
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| KAA Gent II | Liga | Patro Eisden | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.75 | 2.75 | ▼ 2.64 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 54% | ▼ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 54% | 51% | ▼ 44% |
| Clean sheets | • 25% | 26% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 71% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 77% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from KAA Gent II's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Patro Eisden. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of KAA Gent II vs Patro Eisden?
The First Division B match finished KAA Gent II 2:1 Patro Eisden. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before KAA Gent II vs Patro Eisden?
KAA Gent II score 1.38 goals per game on average and Patro Eisden 1.44. The First Division B average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 50% of KAA Gent II's matches and 52% of Patro Eisden's.
What form are KAA Gent II and Patro Eisden in?
Over the last 5 games KAA Gent II have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Patro Eisden 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KAA Gent II vs Patro Eisden?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.