Belgium - First Division BData current as of 23 July 2026

KAA Gent II vs RFC Liege: match statistics

KAA Gent II crest
KAA Gent II
0 : 2half-time 0:1
RFC Liege crest
RFC Liege

KAA Gent II vs RFC Liege: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KAA Gent II play RFC Liege in First Division B (Belgium). The match date is 12 April 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

KAA Gent II: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. RFC Liege: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

KAA Gent II scores 1.31 and concedes 1.59 goals per match. RFC Liege scores 1.32 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KAA Gent II 53%, RFC Liege 41%. Over 2.5: KAA Gent II 56%, RFC Liege 47%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

KAA Gent II has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.32. KAA Gent II: 12.5 shots per match, RFC Liege: 11.3.

Match halves

KAA Gent II: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.72. RFC Liege: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.44.

Goals by minute

KAA Gent II: 61-75 (12 goals). RFC Liege: 31-45+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I back the home win (1), despite RFC Liège being higher in the table (7 vs 9 for KAA Gent II). KAA Gent II creates more chances at home: on average 13.13 shots and 5.0 on target per match, with home xG 1.62 and an average of 1.33 goals scored, while RFC Liège away averages 8.8 shots, 2.6 on target, xG 1.04 and 0.93 goals. The hosts generally control possession (57% vs 43% for the visitors), and the visitors often fail to score on the road — 40% of away matches without a goal versus 27% of home matches without conceding. Gent II’s issue is recent defending: 14 goals conceded in the last 5 matches (2.8 per match), while RFC Liège conceded 10 (2.0 per match), which limits the home advantage. Considering the clear superiority in quality of chances (xG 1.62 vs 1.04 and 5.0 shots on target vs 2.6), but also the defensive risk, I estimate probabilities at 50% for the home win, 28% for a draw and 22% for the away win.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
11Shots15
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
5Shots on target5
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
1.37xG1.73
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
2Corners6
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
45Dangerous attacks61
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
11Fouls10
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
4Cards1
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
1.31Goals scored / match1.32
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
1.59Goals conceded / match1.29
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
58%Average possession46%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
4.38Shots on target / match3.65
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.47Shots per match11.35
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
4.38Shots on target3.65
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
10.5%Shot conversion11.7%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
58%Possession46%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
1.5xG for1.32
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
1.63xG against1.68
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege

Shooting quality

KAA Gent II: BalancedRFC Liege: Balanced
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
Accuracy (shots on target)35%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

RFC Liege is 125% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - KAA Gent II · 1.8 pts / match - RFC Liege

KAA Gent II
LWLLD
Season result split
38% W16% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-5-15
1.28 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-7
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.88BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
RFC Liege
WWWLL
Season result split
47% W15% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-5-13
1.56 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-7
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

RFC Liege is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.59 goals / match - KAA Gent II · 1.29 goals / match - RFC Liege

KAA Gent II scoring profile: strong

KAA Gent II scores in 66% of matches (21 of 32 matches), while RFC Liege keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

RFC Liege scoring profile: very strong

RFC Liege scores in 68% of matches (23 of 34 matches), while KAA Gent II keeps a clean sheet in 19% (6 of 32 matches).

42Goals scored (season)45
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
51Goals conceded (season)44
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
2.91Average goals in match2.62
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
5Goals scored (last 5)7
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
11Goals conceded (last 5)7
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege

How often they score at least...

66%1 goal68%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
44%2 goals41%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
16%3 goals15%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
6%4 goals6%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal71%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
47%2 goals41%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
22%3 goals15%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
9%4 goals3%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time18%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
0%BTTS in both halves6%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
28%Scored in both halves24%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS32%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
60%BTTS - last 560%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

66%Min. 1 goal before half-time85%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

RFC Liege is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.28 pts / match - KAA Gent II · 1.62 pts / match - RFC Liege

KAA Gent II - half-time state
28% leading44% draw28% trailing
RFC Liege - half-time state
47% leading21% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.28Points per match (1st half)1.62
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.88
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
0.66Goals conceded (1st half)0.65
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
1.25Average goals (1st half)1.53
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
56%Clean sheet before half-time53%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
59%No goal before half-time44%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege

After half-time (2nd half)

1.34Points per match (2nd half)0.97
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
0.72Goals scored (2nd half)0.44
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
0.94Goals conceded (2nd half)0.65
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
1.66Average goals (2nd half)1.09
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
44%Clean sheet after half-time47%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege
47%No goal after half-time65%
KAA Gent IIRFC Liege

KAA Gent II - second-half results

34% W31% R34% P
41
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.28
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

RFC Liege - second-half results

18% W44% R38% P
55
Half-time points
30
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KAA Gent II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.4
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-4-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
RFC Liege - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match2.00.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KAA Gent II
ScoredConceded
6
8
0-15
6
6
16-30
7
7
31-45
4
7
46-60
12
11
61-75
7
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

RFC Liege
ScoredConceded
9
6
0-15
10
8
16-30
11
8
31-45
4
6
46-60
3
5
61-75
8
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-28%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KAA Gent II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

RFC Liege

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

KAA Gent IILigaRFC Liege
Average goals in match 2.912.84 2.62
Both teams scored 53%55% 41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%54% 47%
Clean sheets 19%26% 29%
Goal before half-time 66%71% 85%
Goal after half-time 81%79% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.84
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: KAA Gent II 1 - 0 - 0 RFC Liege. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

RFC de Liege
0 : 2
KAA Gent B

FAQ

What was the result of KAA Gent II vs RFC Liege?

The First Division B match finished KAA Gent II 0:2 RFC Liege. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KAA Gent II vs RFC Liege?

KAA Gent II score 1.31 goals per game on average and RFC Liege 1.32. The First Division B average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 53% of KAA Gent II's matches and 41% of RFC Liege's.

What form are KAA Gent II and RFC Liege in?

Over the last 5 games KAA Gent II have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and RFC Liege 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KAA Gent II vs RFC Liege?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.