KAA Gent II vs RFC Seraing: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

KAA Gent II played against RFC Seraing in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on December 19, 2025. Final score: 3:1.

Recent form

KAA Gent II has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. RFC Seraing has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

KAA Gent II scores 1.24 goals per game and allows 1.29. RFC Seraing scores 0.88 and allows 1.56. Games in this league average 2.67 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 41% of KAA Gent II's games and 50% of RFC Seraing's. The Over 2.5 rates are 47% and 44%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

KAA Gent II has the higher season xG average, 1.50 to 1.34 per game. KAA Gent II takes 12.1 shots per game, while RFC Seraing takes 12.0.

First-half and second-half trends

KAA Gent II leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 0.59 goals per game after halftime. RFC Seraing leads at halftime in 6% and scores 0.63 after halftime.

When the teams score

KAA Gent II's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). For RFC Seraing, it is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

First Division B games average 2.67 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Stats by half

2 : 1
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

65Possession (%)35
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
9Shots19
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
4Shots on target4
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
1.15xG1.87
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
2Corners6
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
40Dangerous attacks56
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
9Fouls15
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
2Cards4
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
1.24Goals scored / game0.88
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
1.29Goals allowed / game1.56
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
56%Average possession42%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
4.12Shots on target / game3.94
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.12Shots per game12
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
4.12Shots on target3.94
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
10.2%Shot conversion7.3%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
56%Possession42%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
1.5xG for1.34
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
1.48xG against1.43
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

Shooting quality

KAA Gent II: BalancedRFC Seraing: Balanced
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
Accuracy (shots on target)34%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

RFC Seraing is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - KAA Gent II · 1 pts / game - RFC Seraing

KAA Gent II
DLLLW
Season result split
35% W18% D47% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-8
1.24 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-3-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
RFC Seraing
DDWLL
Season result split
13% W38% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-6-8
0.75 pts / game · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-4-4
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DLDDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KAA Gent II is 41% better for: goals scored per game.

1.24 goals / game - KAA Gent II · 0.88 goals / game - RFC Seraing

KAA Gent II is 21% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.29 goals / game - KAA Gent II · 1.56 goals / game - RFC Seraing

KAA Gent II scoring profile: strong

KAA Gent II scores in 59% of games (10 of 17 meczów), while RFC Seraing keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 meczów).

RFC Seraing scoring profile: strong

RFC Seraing scores in 56% of games (9 of 16 meczów), while KAA Gent II keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 meczów).

21Goals scored (season)14
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
22Goals conceded (season)25
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
2.53Average goals per game2.44
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
4Goals scored (last 5)4
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal56%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
41%2 goals25%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
12%3 goals6%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
12%4 goals0%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal81%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
41%2 goals50%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
18%3 goals13%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
0%4 goals6%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time19%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
0%BTTS in both halves6%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
29%Scored in both halves13%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
60%BTTS - last 540%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KAA Gent II is 113% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.47 pts / game - KAA Gent II · 0.69 pts / game - RFC Seraing

KAA Gent II - half-time state
35% leading41% draw24% trailing
RFC Seraing - half-time state
6% leading50% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per game (1st half)0.69
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.25
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
1.18Average goals (1st half)1
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
71%Clean sheet before half-time44%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
59%No goal before half-time75%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per game (2nd half)1
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
0.59Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
0.76Goals conceded (2nd half)0.81
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
1.35Average goals (2nd half)1.44
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
47%Clean sheet after half-time50%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
53%No goal after half-time56%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

KAA Gent II - second-half results

29% W41% D29% L
25
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

RFC Seraing - second-half results

19% W44% D38% L
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding217%

Leads at halftime in 6% of games and wins 13%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

KAA Gent II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.20
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game1.00.6
Average goals per game1.21.2
1 goal40%40%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-40
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
RFC Seraing - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.20
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game0.60.4
Average goals per game1.00.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

KAA Gent II
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
3
31-45
2
4
46-60
7
4
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

RFC Seraing
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
1
5
16-30
1
5
31-45
4
4
46-60
2
2
61-75
4
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.48
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

KAA Gent II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
5% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
5%

RFC Seraing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

KAA Gent IILigaRFC Seraing
Average goals per game 2.532.67 2.44
Both teams scored 41%52% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%49% 44%
Clean sheets 29%27% 19%
Goal before half-time 59%72% 63%
Goal after half-time 71%78% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per game
52%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / game
1.35
Away goals / game
+-1%
Home attack advantage
+-2%
Home defensive advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KAA Gent IIYellow cardOleksandr Soroka
  2. KAA Gent IIYellow cardGilles De Meyer
  3. RFC SeraingGoalAbdoulaye Agne Ba
  4. RFC SeraingYellow cardMatteo Scarpinati
  5. RFC SeraingYellow cardThiago Paulo da Silva
  6. RFC SeraingSubstitutionOn: Cheikhou Omar NdiayeOff: Thiago Paulo da Silva
  7. KAA Gent IISubstitutionOn: Briek MorelOff: Hannes Vernemmen
  8. KAA Gent IIGoalDavid Mukuna-Trouet
  9. RFC SeraingYellow cardEmmanuel Mutela Tshimbalanga
  10. RFC SeraingYellow cardMatthieu Muland Kayij
  11. RFC SeraingSubstitutionOn: Tom LockmanOff: Hady Camara
  12. KAA Gent IISubstitutionOn: Simon BuggeaOff: Ruslan Vydysh

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Lander BultynckMatches officiated: 13
3.31Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 238%Home wins23%Draws38%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from KAA Gent II's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against RFC Seraing. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

RFC Seraing
0 : 2
KAA Gent B

FAQ

What was the result of KAA Gent II vs RFC Seraing?

The First Division B match finished KAA Gent II 3:1 RFC Seraing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KAA Gent II vs RFC Seraing?

KAA Gent II score 1.24 goals per game on average and RFC Seraing 0.88. The First Division B average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 41% of KAA Gent II's matches and 50% of RFC Seraing's.

What form are KAA Gent II and RFC Seraing in?

Over the last 5 games KAA Gent II have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and RFC Seraing 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KAA Gent II vs RFC Seraing?

The statistical background for KAA Gent II vs RFC Seraing — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.