Belgium - Pro LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

KAA Gent vs Cercle Brugge: match statistics

KAA Gent crest
KAA Gent
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Cercle Brugge crest
Cercle Brugge
155%(2.28)
X28%(3.50)
217%(2.96)

KAA Gent displays clearly better home form with a 50% win rate at their own stadium and a positive goal difference of +7 in home matches. The hosts have averaged 2 points per game in their last five matches, while Cercle Brugge have managed only 1.4 points. Gent dominates in terms of possession (55% vs 45%) and generates more goal-scoring opportunities, which is confirmed by a higher average xG (1.72 vs 1.35). Cercle Brugge has a weaker away offense, failing to score in 33% of their away matches, and their away form is unstable with just a 33% win rate. The difference in quality of play and the home advantage of KAA Gent point towards a home win, although the visitors' solid defense (42% clean sheets away) could make this a closely contested match.

KAA Gent vs Cercle Brugge: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KAA Gent play Cercle Brugge in Pro League (Belgium). The match date is 20 February 2026 at 20:45. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

KAA Gent: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match. Cercle Brugge: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

KAA Gent scores 1.32 and concedes 1.41 goals per match. Cercle Brugge scores 1.47 and concedes 1.61. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KAA Gent 56%, Cercle Brugge 67%. Over 2.5: KAA Gent 49%, Cercle Brugge 58%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Cercle Brugge has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.42. KAA Gent: 12.7 shots per match, Cercle Brugge: 14.3.

Match halves

KAA Gent: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.73. Cercle Brugge: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.61.

Goals by minute

KAA Gent: 76-90+ (17 goals). Cercle Brugge: 31-45+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Pro League: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

KAA Gent displays clearly better home form with a 50% win rate at their own stadium and a positive goal difference of +7 in home matches. The hosts have averaged 2 points per game in their last five matches, while Cercle Brugge have managed only 1.4 points. Gent dominates in terms of possession (55% vs 45%) and generates more goal-scoring opportunities, which is confirmed by a higher average xG (1.72 vs 1.35). Cercle Brugge has a weaker away offense, failing to score in 33% of their away matches, and their away form is unstable with just a 33% win rate. The difference in quality of play and the home advantage of KAA Gent point towards a home win, although the visitors' solid defense (42% clean sheets away) could make this a closely contested match.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
KAA GentCercle Brugge
5Shots23
KAA GentCercle Brugge
1Shots on target4
KAA GentCercle Brugge
0.67xG2.21
KAA GentCercle Brugge
4Corners10
KAA GentCercle Brugge
38Dangerous attacks66
KAA GentCercle Brugge
7Fouls10
KAA GentCercle Brugge
2Cards4
KAA GentCercle Brugge

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

KAA GentCercle Brugge
1.32Goals scored / match1.47
KAA GentCercle Brugge
1.41Goals conceded / match1.61
KAA GentCercle Brugge
49%Average possession48%
KAA GentCercle Brugge
4Shots on target / match4.94
KAA GentCercle Brugge

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.73Shots per match14.31
KAA GentCercle Brugge
4Shots on target4.94
KAA GentCercle Brugge
10.3%Shot conversion10.3%
KAA GentCercle Brugge
49%Possession48%
KAA GentCercle Brugge
1.42xG for1.62
KAA GentCercle Brugge
1.63xG against1.55
KAA GentCercle Brugge

Shooting quality

KAA Gent: BalancedCercle Brugge: Attacking
KAA GentCercle Brugge
Accuracy (shots on target)31%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cercle Brugge is 125% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - KAA Gent · 1.8 pts / match - Cercle Brugge

KAA Gent
DDDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
32% W32% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-13-15
1.27 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-7-6
Last 5 at home
0-4-1
DLDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.87BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
Cercle Brugge
WWWLL
Season result split
28% W31% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-11-15
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-6-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.89Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cercle Brugge is 11% better for: goals scored per match.

1.32 goals / match - KAA Gent · 1.47 goals / match - Cercle Brugge

KAA Gent is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.41 goals / match - KAA Gent · 1.61 goals / match - Cercle Brugge

KAA Gent scoring profile: very strong

KAA Gent scores in 71% of matches (29 of 41 matches), while Cercle Brugge keeps a clean sheet in 22% (8 of 36 matches).

Cercle Brugge scoring profile: very strong

Cercle Brugge scores in 81% of matches (29 of 36 matches), while KAA Gent keeps a clean sheet in 24% (10 of 41 matches).

54Goals scored (season)53
KAA GentCercle Brugge
58Goals conceded (season)58
KAA GentCercle Brugge
2.73Average goals in match3.08
KAA GentCercle Brugge
3Goals scored (last 5)12
KAA GentCercle Brugge
8Goals conceded (last 5)9
KAA GentCercle Brugge

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal81%
KAA GentCercle Brugge
32%2 goals42%
KAA GentCercle Brugge
20%3 goals17%
KAA GentCercle Brugge
10%4 goals8%
KAA GentCercle Brugge

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal78%
KAA GentCercle Brugge
37%2 goals53%
KAA GentCercle Brugge
20%3 goals22%
KAA GentCercle Brugge
7%4 goals8%
KAA GentCercle Brugge

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time22%
KAA GentCercle Brugge
0%BTTS in both halves6%
KAA GentCercle Brugge
27%Scored in both halves22%
KAA GentCercle Brugge

BTTS and goal count

34%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
KAA GentCercle Brugge
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
KAA GentCercle Brugge
60%BTTS - last 580%
KAA GentCercle Brugge

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
KAA GentCercle Brugge
34%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
KAA GentCercle Brugge
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
KAA GentCercle Brugge

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
KAA GentCercle Brugge
49%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
KAA GentCercle Brugge
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
KAA GentCercle Brugge

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cercle Brugge is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.24 pts / match - KAA Gent · 1.39 pts / match - Cercle Brugge

KAA Gent - half-time state
29% leading37% draw34% trailing
Cercle Brugge - half-time state
36% leading31% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per match (1st half)1.39
KAA GentCercle Brugge
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.86
KAA GentCercle Brugge
0.66Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
KAA GentCercle Brugge
1.24Average goals (1st half)1.56
KAA GentCercle Brugge
54%Clean sheet before half-time44%
KAA GentCercle Brugge
56%No goal before half-time47%
KAA GentCercle Brugge

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)1.08
KAA GentCercle Brugge
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.61
KAA GentCercle Brugge
0.76Goals conceded (2nd half)0.92
KAA GentCercle Brugge
1.49Average goals (2nd half)1.53
KAA GentCercle Brugge
49%Clean sheet after half-time44%
KAA GentCercle Brugge
46%No goal after half-time50%
KAA GentCercle Brugge

KAA Gent - second-half results

29% W41% R29% P
51
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding110%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Cercle Brugge - second-half results

22% W42% R36% P
50
Half-time points
31
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.39
PPG before half-time
Lead holding78%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 28%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KAA Gent - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.60
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Cercle Brugge - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.40
Goals scored / match1.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.21.6
Average goals in match1.42.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal0%20%
Goal difference+5-2
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KAA Gent
ScoredConceded
8
6
0-15
6
12
16-30
10
9
31-45
7
5
46-60
6
8
61-75
17
18
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Cercle Brugge
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
8
10
16-30
16
11
31-45
6
15
46-60
8
7
61-75
8
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.91
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+107%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KAA Gent

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Cercle Brugge

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.66
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).

Teams vs league

KAA GentLigaCercle Brugge
Average goals in match 2.732.67 3.08
Both teams scored 56%54% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 49%49% 58%
Clean sheets 24%27% 22%
Goal before half-time 76%71% 86%
Goal after half-time 80%75% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.43
Home goals / match
1.24
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: KAA Gent 1 - 0 - 0 Cercle Brugge. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Cercle Brugge KSV
2 : 4
KAA Gent

FAQ

What was the result of KAA Gent vs Cercle Brugge?

The Pro League match finished KAA Gent 0:1 Cercle Brugge. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KAA Gent vs Cercle Brugge?

KAA Gent score 1.32 goals per game on average and Cercle Brugge 1.47. The Pro League average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 56% of KAA Gent's matches and 67% of Cercle Brugge's.

What form are KAA Gent and Cercle Brugge in?

Over the last 5 games KAA Gent have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Cercle Brugge 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KAA Gent vs Cercle Brugge?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.