Kagera Sugar vs Azam: match statistics
Kagera Sugar vs Azam: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Kagera Sugar played against Azam in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The game was played on August 31, 2026. Venue: Kaitaba Stadium. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Kagera Sugar has 0 wins, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.25 points per game. Azam has 2 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Kagera Sugar scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 2.75. Azam scores 1.75 and allows 1.25. Games in this league average 2.56 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 75% of Kagera Sugar's games and 100% of Azam's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 75%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 41% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Azam has the higher season xG average, 1.91 to 1.62 per game. Kagera Sugar takes 7.5 shots per game, while Azam takes 12.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Kagera Sugar leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.25 goals per game after halftime. Azam leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.75 after halftime.
When the teams score
Kagera Sugar's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). For Azam, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ligi kuu Bara games average 2.56 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 41% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Azam sit 4th and remain unbeaten after three rounds (2 wins and a draw), having collected 13 points from their last five matches through four victories and a draw. Kagera Sugar are 16th, have failed to win any of their three league matches this season, and have managed just 2 draws alongside 3 defeats in their last five outings. The hosts have already conceded 9 goals, including 10 across their last five matches, while Azam have allowed only 3 goals both this season and in their last five fixtures. At home, Kagera average just 0.5 goals and have failed to keep a clean sheet, while their opponents create chances worth an average of 2.01 xG. Azam’s away numbers are more cautious, as their only match on the road ended in a draw; however, the visitors’ superior shot-conversion rate (33% vs. 13%) and clearly stronger form trend support an Azam victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal comes from Kagera Sugar’s current form: they have scored an average of just 0.6 goals in their last 5 matches, while Azam have conceded only 0.6 goals per game. The hosts have not won any of their last five outings and scored just 3 goals during that period, whereas Azam have recorded a run of 4 wins and conceded 3 goals in five matches. Azam should have good conditions to score, as Kagera Sugar have conceded an average of 2.0 goals over their last five league matches, with an xG against of 1.63. The seasonal data supports BTTS, with both teams recording this market at 100%, but more recent indicators are clearly less favourable for a goal from the hosts: Kagera Sugar’s BTTS rate has fallen to 40%, with an average xG of 1.47. The BTTS - No scenario is therefore more likely, mainly due to the realistic possibility that defensively solid Azam will keep the hosts scoreless.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The latest form clearly favors Azam: the team is averaging 1.8 goals scored and conceding just 0.6 goals over its last 5 matches, while Kagera Sugar is scoring only 0.6 goals and allowing opponents 2.0. The quality of chances also points to an away advantage, with the visitors averaging 1.62 xG compared with 1.47 for the hosts. However, Kagera Sugar has conceded an average xG of 1.63, so Azam should create enough chances to approach the two-goal mark. At the same time, only 20% of Kagera’s last five matches and 40% of Azam’s matches went over 2.5 goals, while neither team recorded a result above 3.5 goals in the available season matches. The strongest signal is therefore Under 3.5, as the projected total of 2.55 goals suggests a good chance of 2-3 goals but limits the probability of four or more goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Recent form clearly favors Azam: the visitors have collected 13 points from 5 matches, winning 4 of them and conceding an average of just 0.6 goals, while Kagera Sugar have earned 2 points and recorded averages of 0.6 goals scored and 2.0 conceded per match. At half-time, Azam remained unbeaten in their last five appearances, drawing 60% of the first halves and taking the lead in 40%, whereas Kagera were trailing at the break in as many as 60% of their matches. The hosts scored just 0.4 goals before half-time and conceded 1.0, while Azam averaged 1.0 goals scored and only 0.2 conceded during this period. After the interval, Kagera have averaged 0.2 goals scored and 1.0 conceded, while Azam have posted a positive second-half goal difference of +2 across their last five matches. The most likely scenario is therefore a level score at half-time, followed by Azam's superior organization and current efficiency resulting in an away win in the HT/FT market.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Kagera Sugar | Azam | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 53% | 53% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.22 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Azam is 700% better for: last-5 form.
0.25 pts / game - Kagera Sugar · 2 pts / game - Azam
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Azam is 75% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Kagera Sugar · 1.75 goals / game - Azam
Azam is 120% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.75 goals / game - Kagera Sugar · 1.25 goals / game - Azam
Kagera Sugar scores in 75% of games (3 of 4 games), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 games).
Azam scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 games), while Kagera Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kagera Sugar
Over / Under - Azam
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Azam is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - Kagera Sugar · 2 pts / game - Azam
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kagera Sugar - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Azam - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.50 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 25% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 0% |
| No goal | 25% | 75% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.3 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 25% |
| No goal | 25% | 25% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Kagera Sugar
Azam
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Kagera Sugar | Liga | Azam | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.75 | 2.56 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 50% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 41% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 25% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 76% | • 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 76% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Kagera Sugar vs Azam?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Kagera Sugar 0:2 Azam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kagera Sugar vs Azam?
Kagera Sugar score 1.00 goals per game on average and Azam 1.75. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Kagera Sugar's matches and 100% of Azam's.
What form are Kagera Sugar and Azam in?
Over the last 5 games Kagera Sugar have a 0-1-3 record (0.25 points per game) and Azam 2-2-0 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kagera Sugar vs Azam?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kagera Sugar vs Azam: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


