Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraKaitaba StadiumData current as of August 30, 2026

Kagera Sugar vs Azam: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Kagera Sugar vs Azam: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Kagera Sugar plays Azam in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The game is scheduled for August 31, 2026. Venue: Kaitaba Stadium.

Recent form

Kagera Sugar has 0 wins, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.25 points per game. Azam has 2 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Kagera Sugar scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 2.75. Azam scores 1.75 and allows 1.25. Games in this league average 2.59 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 75% of Kagera Sugar's games and 100% of Azam's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 75%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Azam has the higher season xG average, 1.91 to 1.62 per game. Kagera Sugar takes 7.5 shots per game, while Azam takes 12.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Kagera Sugar leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.25 goals per game after halftime. Azam leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.75 after halftime.

When the teams score

Kagera Sugar's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). For Azam, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ligi kuu Bara games average 2.59 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Before kickoff

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1Goals scored / game1.75
Kagera SugarAzam
2.75Goals allowed / game1.25
Kagera SugarAzam
49%Average possession56%
Kagera SugarAzam
4Shots on target / game6.5
Kagera SugarAzam

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

7.5Shots per game12.25
Kagera SugarAzam
4Shots on target6.5
Kagera SugarAzam
13.3%Shot conversion14.3%
Kagera SugarAzam
49%Possession56%
Kagera SugarAzam
1.62xG for1.91
Kagera SugarAzam
1.74xG against1.51
Kagera SugarAzam

Shooting quality

Kagera Sugar: Efficient finishingAzam: Efficient finishing
Kagera SugarAzam
Accuracy (shots on target)53%53%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.220.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Azam is 700% better for: last-5 form.

0.25 pts / game - Kagera Sugar · 2 pts / game - Azam

Kagera Sugar
LDLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W25% R75% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-3
0.25 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-3
0.25 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 at home
0-1-1
LD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 50%
Azam
DWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-0
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-0
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-0
Last 5 away
0-2-0
DD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.91Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 75%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Azam is 75% better for: goals scored per game.

1 goals / game - Kagera Sugar · 1.75 goals / game - Azam

Azam is 120% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.75 goals / game - Kagera Sugar · 1.25 goals / game - Azam

Kagera Sugar scoring profile: very strong

Kagera Sugar scores in 75% of games (3 of 4 meczów), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 meczów).

Azam scoring profile: very strong

Azam scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 meczów), while Kagera Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 meczów).

4Goals scored (season)7
Kagera SugarAzam
11Goals conceded (season)5
Kagera SugarAzam
3.75Average goals per game3
Kagera SugarAzam
4Goals scored (last 5)7
Kagera SugarAzam
11Goals conceded (last 5)5
Kagera SugarAzam

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal100%
Kagera SugarAzam
25%2 goals75%
Kagera SugarAzam
0%3 goals0%
Kagera SugarAzam
0%4 goals0%
Kagera SugarAzam

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
Kagera SugarAzam
75%2 goals25%
Kagera SugarAzam
25%3 goals0%
Kagera SugarAzam
25%4 goals0%
Kagera SugarAzam

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time25%
Kagera SugarAzam
25%BTTS in both halves0%
Kagera SugarAzam
25%Scored in both halves50%
Kagera SugarAzam

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS75%
Kagera SugarAzam
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Kagera SugarAzam
75%BTTS - last 5100%
Kagera SugarAzam

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Kagera SugarAzam
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Kagera SugarAzam
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Kagera SugarAzam

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Kagera SugarAzam
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Kagera SugarAzam
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Kagera SugarAzam

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Azam is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / game - Kagera Sugar · 2 pts / game - Azam

Kagera Sugar - half-time state
50% leading0% draw50% trailing
Azam - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per game (1st half)2
Kagera SugarAzam
0.75Goals scored (1st half)1
Kagera SugarAzam
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
Kagera SugarAzam
1.75Average goals (1st half)1.25
Kagera SugarAzam
50%Clean sheet before half-time75%
Kagera SugarAzam
25%No goal before half-time25%
Kagera SugarAzam

After half-time (2nd half)

0Points per game (2nd half)1
Kagera SugarAzam
0.25Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
Kagera SugarAzam
1.75Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Kagera SugarAzam
2Average goals (2nd half)1.75
Kagera SugarAzam
0%Clean sheet after half-time25%
Kagera SugarAzam
75%No goal after half-time25%
Kagera SugarAzam

Kagera Sugar - second-half results

0% W0% R100% P
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.8

Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Azam - second-half results

25% W25% R50% P
8
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.8

Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Kagera Sugar - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.500.00
Goals scored / game0.80.3
Goals allowed / game1.01.8
Average goals per game1.82.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals25%50%
3 goals25%25%
Clean sheet50%0%
No goal25%75%
Goal difference-1-6
Half-time: 50% leading - 0% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 3
Azam - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.00
Goals scored / game1.00.8
Goals allowed / game0.31.0
Average goals per game1.31.8
1 goal75%100%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet75%25%
No goal25%25%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 25% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Kagera Sugar
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
0
5
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Azam
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.38
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 2.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
130%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
88%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Kagera Sugar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.62
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-1.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
275%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Azam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
175%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

Kagera SugarLigaAzam
Average goals per game 3.752.59 3.00
Both teams scored 75%53% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%44% 75%
Clean sheets 0%23% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%75% 75%
Goal after half-time 100%75% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per game
53%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.59
Home goals / game
1.00
Away goals / game
+59%
Home attack advantage
+37%
Home defensive advantage
+25%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

FAQ

When do Kagera Sugar and Azam play?

Kagera Sugar face Azam on August 31, 2026 in Ligi kuu Bara at Kaitaba Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kagera Sugar vs Azam?

Kagera Sugar score 1.00 goals per game on average and Azam 1.75. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Kagera Sugar's matches and 100% of Azam's.

What form are Kagera Sugar and Azam in?

Over the last 5 games Kagera Sugar have a 0-1-3 record (0.25 points per game) and Azam 2-2-0 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kagera Sugar vs Azam?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kagera Sugar vs Azam: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.