Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of September 12, 2026

Kahraba Ismailia vs Petrojet: match statistics

Kahraba Ismailia crest
Kahraba Ismailia
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Petrojet crest
Petrojet

Kahraba Ismailia vs Petrojet: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Kahraba Ismailia played against Petrojet in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The game was played on April 6, 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Kahraba Ismailia has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Petrojet has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Kahraba Ismailia scores 1.10 goals per game and allows 1.81. Petrojet scores 1.10 and allows 1.19. Games in this league average 2.01 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 67% of Kahraba Ismailia's games and 62% of Petrojet's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 43%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 33% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Petrojet has the higher season xG average, 1.31 to 1.15 per game. Kahraba Ismailia takes 9.1 shots per game, while Petrojet takes 11.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Kahraba Ismailia leads at halftime in 19% of its games and scores 0.81 goals per game after halftime. Petrojet leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.62 after halftime.

When the teams score

Kahraba Ismailia's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). For Petrojet, it is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Egyptian Premier League games average 2.01 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 33% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Petrojet holds a clear defensive advantage and in the table: Kahraba are 19th, Petrojet 12th; the home side have not recorded any home wins (0% wins) and lose 82% of home matches, conceding on average 2.36 goals at their stadium. Kahraba average 9.27 shots per match and 3.36 shots on target at home, scoring 1.09 goals on average, but 38 goals conceded this season and 0% clean sheets indicate serious defensive issues and produce a high average of goals in their home matches (3.45). Petrojet away average 11.73 shots per match, xG 1.33 versus the home side xG 1.16, and concede only 1.18 goals on average away with 27% clean sheets, giving them superior chance quality and defensive stability. In the last 5 matches Kahraba have a record of 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss with an average of 1.2 points per match, and Petrojet 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses with an average of 0.8 points per match, so form is balanced but the season-long stats favor the visitors. Considering lower goals conceded (1.18 vs 2.36), higher xG for the visitors (1.33 vs 1.16) and Kahraba’s lack of home wins, I predict a Petrojet win (55%), draw (30%) or home win (15%).

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams show strong seasonal BTTS indicators: Kahraba 60% and Petrojet 64%, giving a base roughly 62% probability of both teams scoring. In the last 5 matches Kahraba posts BTTS at 80% and has scored 7 goals (1.4 per game), while Petrojet has 40% BTTS and managed only 4 goals in five matches (0.8 per game), which weakens their scoring chances. xG indicates comparable offensive potential — xG_for 1.30 vs 1.33 and xG_against 1.43 vs 1.35 — and average shots on target 3.5 vs 2.82 point to genuine chances for both sides. Additionally, low clean sheet percentages 30% and 27% and season totals of 23 goals scored by each team suggest both sides regularly both concede and score, so I assess BTTS 68% vs 32% and recommend the

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams generate very similar xG: Kahraba 1.30 and Petrojet 1.33, while opponents’ expected xG are 1.43 (for Kahraba) and 1.35 (for Petrojet), yielding forecasts of ≈1.33 goals for Kahraba and ≈1.38 for Petrojet (total ≈2.71). Season-long metrics confirm a scoring tendency — Over 1.5 occurs in 70% of Kahraba’s matches and 73% of Petrojet’s, and both teams scored in 60% and 64% of games respectively, increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. In the last 5 matches Kahraba scored 7 and conceded 6 (1.4 and 1.2 per game), while Petrojet scored 4 and conceded 10 (0.8 and 2.0), suggesting weaker defense from Petrojet and higher combined potential. A Poisson model with λ=2.71 gives approximately a 75% chance for Over 1.5, ~51% for Over 2.5 and ~29% for Over 3.5. Therefore the strongest signal from the data is a bet on Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X). The home side drew at the break in 60% of matches, while the overall draw rates are 50% for hosts and 55% for visitors, strongly favoring a shared point outcome. Both teams have similar xG – 1.3 for the hosts versus 1.33 for the guests – and both score regularly across the season (60% for hosts and 64% for guests), which increases the probability of a draw with goals. The hosts concede only 0.1 goals on average by half-time and keep a clean sheet at the break in 90% of games, so goalless or minimal scores at 45 minutes are common. However, most goals come after the break (hosts’ second halves see >0 goals in 90% of matches vs 64% for visitors), and the hosts concede 1.1 goals on average in the second half with a second-half goal difference of -5, making a full-time draw (e.g. 1-1) the most probable outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

47Possession (%)53
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
8Shots16
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
0Shots on target6
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
0.9xG1.87
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
4Corners10
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
54Dangerous attacks61
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
7Fouls12
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
2Cards4
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
1.1Goals scored / game1.1
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
1.81Goals allowed / game1.19
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
45%Average possession44%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
3.33Shots on target / game3.14
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.1Shots per game11.57
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
3.33Shots on target3.14
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
12%Shot conversion9.5%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
45%Possession44%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
1.15xG for1.31
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
1.59xG against1.39
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet

Shooting quality

Kahraba Ismailia: Counter-attackingPetrojet: Balanced
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
Accuracy (shots on target)37%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Kahraba Ismailia
DDWLD
Season result split
19% W24% D57% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-5-12
0.81 pts / game · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-2-9
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LLDLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Petrojet
DWDLD
Season result split
24% W52% D24% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-11-5
1.24 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-6-3
Last 5 away
0-3-2
LLDDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 0.98BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Petrojet is 52% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.81 goals / game - Kahraba Ismailia · 1.19 goals / game - Petrojet

Kahraba Ismailia scoring profile: very strong

Kahraba Ismailia scores in 81% of games (17 of 21 meczów), while Petrojet keeps a clean sheet in 29% (6 of 21 meczów).

Petrojet scoring profile: very strong

Petrojet scores in 76% of games (16 of 21 meczów), while Kahraba Ismailia keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 meczów).

23Goals scored (season)23
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
38Goals conceded (season)25
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
2.9Average goals per game2.29
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
7Goals scored (last 5)6
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal76%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
29%2 goals24%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
0%3 goals10%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
0%4 goals0%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal71%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
52%2 goals43%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
19%3 goals5%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
19%4 goals0%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

67%
Kahraba Ismailia - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 21 meczów
47%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time10%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
5%BTTS in both halves5%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
14%Scored in both halves14%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
80%BTTS - last 580%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

52%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
19%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet

2nd half

95%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Petrojet is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.05 pts / game - Kahraba Ismailia · 1.48 pts / game - Petrojet

Kahraba Ismailia - half-time state
19% leading48% draw33% trailing
Petrojet - half-time state
33% leading48% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.05Points per game (1st half)1.48
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.48
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
0.52Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
0.81Average goals (1st half)0.86
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
62%Clean sheet before half-time71%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
76%No goal before half-time57%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1.24
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
0.81Goals scored (2nd half)0.62
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
1.29Goals conceded (2nd half)0.81
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
2.1Average goals (2nd half)1.43
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
24%Clean sheet after half-time48%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet
29%No goal after half-time52%
Kahraba IsmailiaPetrojet

Kahraba Ismailia - second-half results

19% W43% D38% L
22
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 19%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.8

Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Petrojet - second-half results

29% W38% D33% L
31
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding73%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 24%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Kahraba Ismailia - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.20
Goals scored / game0.41.0
Goals allowed / game0.21.0
Average goals per game0.62.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Petrojet - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.402.40
Goals scored / game0.01.2
Goals allowed / game0.80.4
Average goals per game0.81.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference-4+4
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Kahraba Ismailia
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
2
3
16-30
2
5
31-45
7
5
46-60
6
9
61-75
4
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

Petrojet
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
5
1
16-30
3
4
31-45
1
9
46-60
3
3
61-75
9
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
129%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+54%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Kahraba Ismailia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
185%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Petrojet

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
39% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
39%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Kahraba IsmailiaLigaPetrojet
Average goals per game 2.902.01 2.29
Both teams scored 67%47% 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%33% 43%
Clean sheets 14%35% 29%
Goal before half-time 52%57% 62%
Goal after half-time 95%70% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.01
Average goals per game
47%
Both teams scored
33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.03
Home goals / game
0.98
Away goals / game
+5%
Home attack advantage
+5%
Home defensive advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Kahraba IsmailiaRed cardIslam Abdelnaim Abdelkader
  2. PetrojetYellow cardSikou Sonko
  3. PetrojetRed cardBadr Moussa
  4. PetrojetSubstitutionOn: Mohamed IbrahimOff: Mostafa El Badry
  5. PetrojetYellow cardMostafa El Gamal
  6. PetrojetSubstitutionOn: Amadou Djoulde BahOff: Mostafa El Gamal
  7. Kahraba IsmailiaSubstitutionOn: Abdallah MaradonaOff: Ali Sulieman

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Mostafa El ShahdiMatches officiated: 11
4.64Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 218%Home wins55%Draws27%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Kahraba Ismailia's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Petrojet. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Petrojet
2 : 2
Kahraba Ismailia

FAQ

What was the result of Kahraba Ismailia vs Petrojet?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Kahraba Ismailia 0:0 Petrojet. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kahraba Ismailia vs Petrojet?

Kahraba Ismailia score 1.10 goals per game on average and Petrojet 1.10. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Kahraba Ismailia's matches and 62% of Petrojet's.

What form are Kahraba Ismailia and Petrojet in?

Over the last 5 games Kahraba Ismailia have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Petrojet 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kahraba Ismailia vs Petrojet?

The statistical background for Kahraba Ismailia vs Petrojet — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.