Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of September 12, 2026

Kahraba Ismailia vs Pharco: match statistics

Kahraba Ismailia crest
Kahraba Ismailia
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Pharco crest
Pharco

Kahraba Ismailia vs Pharco: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Kahraba Ismailia played against Pharco in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The game was played on May 8, 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Kahraba Ismailia has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Pharco has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Kahraba Ismailia scores 1.11 goals per game and allows 1.71. Pharco scores 0.46 and allows 1.11. Games in this league average 2.00 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 71% of Kahraba Ismailia's games and 32% of Pharco's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 11%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 34% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

The teams have nearly identical season xG averages at 1.14 per game. Kahraba Ismailia takes 9.0 shots per game, while Pharco takes 9.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Kahraba Ismailia leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 0.82 goals per game after halftime. Pharco leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.29 after halftime.

When the teams score

Kahraba Ismailia's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (9 goals). For Pharco, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Egyptian Premier League games average 2.00 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 34% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a Kahraba Ismailia win. Hosts have scored 31 goals this season versus Pharco's 13, and at home average 1.0 goals per match compared to the visitors' 0.5 on the road. In the last 5 fixtures Kahraba have 7 goals and 1.4 points per game, while Pharco have 3 goals and 0.8 points, indicating superior attacking form from the hosts. Quality of chances favors Kahraba — home average xG 1.18 with 3.19 shots on target and an 11% conversion rate, versus away xG 1.06, 2.57 shots on target and 6% conversion for Pharco. However, the hosts are vulnerable defensively: they concede 2.13 goals at home on average (48 conceded this season), while Pharco concede 1.36 on the road (31 this season), so the game could be open. Considering the markedly higher efficiency and the fact that Pharco fail to score in 57% of away matches (hosts fail to score in only 19% of home games), I assign probabilities: 60% home win, 25% draw, 15% away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back No BTTS, because both teams show low seasonal scoring efficiency: Kahraba averages 0.43 goals per match and Pharco 0.50. Seasonal percentages of matches with both teams scoring are only 29% for the home side and 36% for the visitors, well below the league average of 46%; with a league clean sheet expected rate of 69% this is a strong signal against BTTS. Although xG_for is 1.23 for Kahraba and 1.06 for Pharco, and xG_against 1.41 and 1.53 respectively, low shot conversion of 4% and 6% means situational potential rarely translates into goals. Additionally, the hosts concede 0.86 goals per match on average and Pharco 1.36; the short-term form (hosts have 100% BTTS in the last 5 matches, Pharco 40%) does not outweigh the long-term seasonal trends, hence a 35% allocation to Yes and 65% to No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The combined xG for both teams is 2.29 (1.23 for Kahraba and 1.06 for Pharco), but actual season goals per game are only 0.43 and 0.50, indicating a large gap between created chances and finishing. Kahraba averages 3.29 shots on target with a 4% conversion, Pharco 2.57 shots on target with a 6% conversion, so generated opportunities rarely translate into goals. Season-long Over/Under stats strongly favor low scores: Over 2.5 goals occurred in just 7% of Kahraba’s matches and 14% of Pharco’s matches (i.e. 93% and 86% under 2.5 respectively). Considering short-term form as well (last 5 matches: Kahraba 1.4 goals average, Pharco 0.6), I project 0.95 goals for the home side and 0.75 for the away side (total 1.70). A Poisson model with lambda=1.70 yields roughly a 51% chance of over 1.5, ~24% for over 2.5 and ~9% for over 3.5, therefore I recommend the under 2.5 line as the strongest and safest pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X). Both teams were level at the break in 50% of their matches, and the home side led at the break in only 3 games (21%) versus 1 instance of the away side leading (7%), which increases the probability of a draw at the break. Home teams score an average of 0.21 goals by half-time, visitors 0.14, and the home side kept a half-time clean sheet in 71% of matches, so the first half should be low-scoring. A full-time draw is also a strong signal: hosts finished level in 50% of matches, visitors in 36%, and the low shot efficiency (4% for hosts vs 6% for visitors) and xG of 1.23 versus 1.06 support a low number of goals and a split of points.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

71Possession (%)29
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
15Shots9
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
2Shots on target1
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
1.48xG0.9
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
9Corners3
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
56Dangerous attacks37
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
16Fouls10
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
3Cards2
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
1.11Goals scored / game0.46
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
1.71Goals allowed / game1.11
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
44%Average possession43%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
3.21Shots on target / game2.93
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8.96Shots per game9.71
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
3.21Shots on target2.93
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
12.4%Shot conversion4.8%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
44%Possession43%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
1.14xG for1.14
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
1.57xG against1.47
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco

Shooting quality

Kahraba Ismailia: Counter-attackingPharco: Balanced
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
Accuracy (shots on target)36%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.16

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Kahraba Ismailia is 75% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Kahraba Ismailia · 0.8 pts / game - Pharco

Kahraba Ismailia
DLWLW
Season result split
21% W29% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-8-14
0.93 pts / game · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-5-11
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
DDDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Pharco
WLLLD
Season result split
11% W43% D46% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-12-13
0.75 pts / game · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-5-8
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DDLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kahraba Ismailia is 141% better for: goals scored per game.

1.11 goals / game - Kahraba Ismailia · 0.46 goals / game - Pharco

Pharco is 54% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.71 goals / game - Kahraba Ismailia · 1.11 goals / game - Pharco

Kahraba Ismailia scoring profile: very strong

Kahraba Ismailia scores in 82% of games (23 of 28 meczów), while Pharco keeps a clean sheet in 25% (7 of 28 meczów).

Pharco scoring profile: strong

Pharco scores in 39% of games (11 of 28 meczów), while Kahraba Ismailia keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 28 meczów).

31Goals scored (season)13
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
48Goals conceded (season)31
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
2.82Average goals per game1.57
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
7Goals scored (last 5)3
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
9Goals conceded (last 5)5
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal39%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
29%2 goals7%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
0%3 goals0%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
0%4 goals0%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal75%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
46%2 goals29%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
21%3 goals4%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
14%4 goals4%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

71%
Kahraba Ismailia - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.20 of 28 meczów
46%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time4%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
4%BTTS in both halves4%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
14%Scored in both halves4%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS11%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
100%BTTS - last 540%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time54%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time11%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time68%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
68%Min. 2 goals after half-time21%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kahraba Ismailia is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.04 pts / game - Kahraba Ismailia · 0.93 pts / game - Pharco

Kahraba Ismailia - half-time state
18% leading50% draw32% trailing
Pharco - half-time state
14% leading50% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.04Points per game (1st half)0.93
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.18
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.46
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
0.79Average goals (1st half)0.64
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
64%Clean sheet before half-time61%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
75%No goal before half-time82%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)0.75
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
0.82Goals scored (2nd half)0.29
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
1.21Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
2.04Average goals (2nd half)0.93
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
25%Clean sheet after half-time43%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco
29%No goal after half-time75%
Kahraba IsmailiaPharco

Kahraba Ismailia - second-half results

18% W46% D36% L
29
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 21%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.7

Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Pharco - second-half results

11% W43% D46% L
26
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding79%

Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 11%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Kahraba Ismailia - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game0.41.0
Goals allowed / game0.61.2
Average goals per game1.02.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Pharco - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.401.40
Goals scored / game0.00.6
Goals allowed / game0.60.4
Average goals per game0.61.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Kahraba Ismailia
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
2
5
16-30
4
6
31-45
9
7
46-60
8
10
61-75
6
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -11 - late phases are a weakness.

Pharco
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
0
5
16-30
2
4
31-45
2
5
46-60
2
5
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.20
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
32%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Kahraba Ismailia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
178%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Pharco

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.68
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
48%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Kahraba IsmailiaLigaPharco
Average goals per game 2.822.00 1.57
Both teams scored 71%46% 32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%34% 11%
Clean sheets 14%35% 25%
Goal before half-time 50%57% 54%
Goal after half-time 93%69% 68%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.00
Average goals per game
46%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.03
Home goals / game
0.96
Away goals / game
+7%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defensive advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Kahraba IsmailiaYellow cardSerge Arnaud Aka
  2. PharcoYellow cardHossam Reda
  3. PharcoYellow cardHossam Reda
  4. PharcoSubstitutionOn: Mohamed HusseinOff: Mahmoud Farahat
  5. Kahraba IsmailiaSubstitutionOn: Mohamed ShikaOff: Benjamin Boateng
  6. Kahraba IsmailiaYellow cardOmar El Said
  7. Kahraba IsmailiaSubstitutionOn: Mostafa Abdel RahimOff: Hassan El Shazly
  8. Kahraba IsmailiaYellow cardSeif Hassan Elkhashab
  9. PharcoSubstitutionOn: Mohamed GaberOff: Fathy Mohamed

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Kahraba Ismailia's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Pharco. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Kahraba Ismailia vs Pharco?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Kahraba Ismailia 0:0 Pharco. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kahraba Ismailia vs Pharco?

Kahraba Ismailia score 1.11 goals per game on average and Pharco 0.46. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Kahraba Ismailia's matches and 32% of Pharco's.

What form are Kahraba Ismailia and Pharco in?

Over the last 5 games Kahraba Ismailia have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Pharco 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kahraba Ismailia vs Pharco?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.