Kahraba Ismailia vs Pharco: match statistics
Kahraba Ismailia vs Pharco: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Kahraba Ismailia played against Pharco in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The game was played on May 8, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Kahraba Ismailia has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Pharco has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Kahraba Ismailia scores 1.11 goals per game and allows 1.71. Pharco scores 0.46 and allows 1.11. Games in this league average 2.00 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 71% of Kahraba Ismailia's games and 32% of Pharco's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 11%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 34% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
The teams have nearly identical season xG averages at 1.14 per game. Kahraba Ismailia takes 9.0 shots per game, while Pharco takes 9.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Kahraba Ismailia leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 0.82 goals per game after halftime. Pharco leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.29 after halftime.
When the teams score
Kahraba Ismailia's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (9 goals). For Pharco, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Egyptian Premier League games average 2.00 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 34% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a Kahraba Ismailia win. Hosts have scored 31 goals this season versus Pharco's 13, and at home average 1.0 goals per match compared to the visitors' 0.5 on the road. In the last 5 fixtures Kahraba have 7 goals and 1.4 points per game, while Pharco have 3 goals and 0.8 points, indicating superior attacking form from the hosts. Quality of chances favors Kahraba — home average xG 1.18 with 3.19 shots on target and an 11% conversion rate, versus away xG 1.06, 2.57 shots on target and 6% conversion for Pharco. However, the hosts are vulnerable defensively: they concede 2.13 goals at home on average (48 conceded this season), while Pharco concede 1.36 on the road (31 this season), so the game could be open. Considering the markedly higher efficiency and the fact that Pharco fail to score in 57% of away matches (hosts fail to score in only 19% of home games), I assign probabilities: 60% home win, 25% draw, 15% away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back No BTTS, because both teams show low seasonal scoring efficiency: Kahraba averages 0.43 goals per match and Pharco 0.50. Seasonal percentages of matches with both teams scoring are only 29% for the home side and 36% for the visitors, well below the league average of 46%; with a league clean sheet expected rate of 69% this is a strong signal against BTTS. Although xG_for is 1.23 for Kahraba and 1.06 for Pharco, and xG_against 1.41 and 1.53 respectively, low shot conversion of 4% and 6% means situational potential rarely translates into goals. Additionally, the hosts concede 0.86 goals per match on average and Pharco 1.36; the short-term form (hosts have 100% BTTS in the last 5 matches, Pharco 40%) does not outweigh the long-term seasonal trends, hence a 35% allocation to Yes and 65% to No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The combined xG for both teams is 2.29 (1.23 for Kahraba and 1.06 for Pharco), but actual season goals per game are only 0.43 and 0.50, indicating a large gap between created chances and finishing. Kahraba averages 3.29 shots on target with a 4% conversion, Pharco 2.57 shots on target with a 6% conversion, so generated opportunities rarely translate into goals. Season-long Over/Under stats strongly favor low scores: Over 2.5 goals occurred in just 7% of Kahraba’s matches and 14% of Pharco’s matches (i.e. 93% and 86% under 2.5 respectively). Considering short-term form as well (last 5 matches: Kahraba 1.4 goals average, Pharco 0.6), I project 0.95 goals for the home side and 0.75 for the away side (total 1.70). A Poisson model with lambda=1.70 yields roughly a 51% chance of over 1.5, ~24% for over 2.5 and ~9% for over 3.5, therefore I recommend the under 2.5 line as the strongest and safest pick.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X). Both teams were level at the break in 50% of their matches, and the home side led at the break in only 3 games (21%) versus 1 instance of the away side leading (7%), which increases the probability of a draw at the break. Home teams score an average of 0.21 goals by half-time, visitors 0.14, and the home side kept a half-time clean sheet in 71% of matches, so the first half should be low-scoring. A full-time draw is also a strong signal: hosts finished level in 50% of matches, visitors in 36%, and the low shot efficiency (4% for hosts vs 6% for visitors) and xG of 1.23 versus 1.06 support a low number of goals and a split of points.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Kahraba Ismailia | Pharco | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.16 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Kahraba Ismailia is 75% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Kahraba Ismailia · 0.8 pts / game - Pharco
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kahraba Ismailia is 141% better for: goals scored per game.
1.11 goals / game - Kahraba Ismailia · 0.46 goals / game - Pharco
Pharco is 54% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.71 goals / game - Kahraba Ismailia · 1.11 goals / game - Pharco
Kahraba Ismailia scores in 82% of games (23 of 28 meczów), while Pharco keeps a clean sheet in 25% (7 of 28 meczów).
Pharco scores in 39% of games (11 of 28 meczów), while Kahraba Ismailia keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 28 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kahraba Ismailia
Over / Under - Pharco
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kahraba Ismailia is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.04 pts / game - Kahraba Ismailia · 0.93 pts / game - Pharco
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kahraba Ismailia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 21%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Pharco - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 11%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -11 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Kahraba Ismailia
Pharco
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Kahraba Ismailia | Liga | Pharco | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.82 | 2.00 | ▼ 1.57 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 71% | 46% | ▼ 32% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 34% | ▼ 11% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 35% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 57% | ▼ 54% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 69% | • 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- PharcoYellow cardHossam Reda
- PharcoYellow cardHossam Reda
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Kahraba Ismailia's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Pharco. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Kahraba Ismailia vs Pharco?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Kahraba Ismailia 0:0 Pharco. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kahraba Ismailia vs Pharco?
Kahraba Ismailia score 1.11 goals per game on average and Pharco 0.46. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Kahraba Ismailia's matches and 32% of Pharco's.
What form are Kahraba Ismailia and Pharco in?
Over the last 5 games Kahraba Ismailia have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Pharco 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kahraba Ismailia vs Pharco?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


