Kaisar vs Aktobe: match statistics
Kaisar vs Aktobe: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Kaisar played against Aktobe in Kazakhstan Premier League (Kazakhstan). The game was played on August 15, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Kaisar has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Aktobe has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Kaisar scores 0.75 goals per game and allows 1.10. Aktobe scores 1.43 and allows 1.19. Games in this league average 2.43 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 55% of Kaisar's games and 52% of Aktobe's. The Over 2.5 rates are 30% and 43%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Aktobe has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.18 per game. Kaisar takes 10.6 shots per game, while Aktobe takes 13.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Kaisar leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.20 goals per game after halftime. Aktobe leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.86 after halftime.
When the teams score
Kaisar's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Aktobe, it is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Kazakhstan Premier League games average 2.43 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
A draw is the most likely outcome, as Kaisar shared the points in 73% of their home matches, winning only 9% of them. The hosts average 0.82 goals scored at home but concede just 0.91, which points towards a low-scoring and evenly matched result. Aktobe sit higher in the table, in 5th place compared with Kaisar’s 13th, but they lose 60% of their away matches and have not kept a single clean sheet on the road. The visitors average 1.10 goals scored away from home, yet allow opponents an xG of 1.59 and concede 1.70 goals per match, meaning their superior quality may not be enough to secure a win. Kaisar have conceded only 4 goals in their last five matches, while Aktobe have conceded 10, further strengthening the draw scenario.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The “Yes” selection is primarily supported by Aktobe’s current form, with all 5 of their last matches ending with both teams scoring; they averaged 2.0 goals scored in those games, but also conceded 2.0. Kaisar recorded BTTS in 60% of their last five fixtures, while their opponent has not kept a clean sheet at any point this season, conceding an average of 1.70 goals per match. The hosts are clearly dangerous offensively at home: they average 1.73 goals, generate an xG of 1.77, and register 6.45 shots on target per game, compared with Aktobe’s 3.20. Aktobe’s chances of scoring also look solid, as despite Kaisar’s 55% clean-sheet rate, they allow opponents an average xG of 1.25, while the visitors produced an xG of 1.56 across their last five matches. Kaisar’s season-long BTTS rate stands at just 45%, but the combination of Aktobe’s defensive weakness and their highly open recent performances provides a stronger signal for BTTS - Yes. This does not mean a 0:0 is expected or that neither team will score; rather, it indicates that at least one team is expected not to score only when selecting BTTS - No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Kaisar have a clear basis for scoring: they average 1.73 goals, create 1.77 xG and record 6.45 shots on target per match, while Aktobe concede an average of 1.70 goals. The visitors’ attacking potential is lower, as their scoring average stands at 1.10, while Kaisar allow opponents just 0.73 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in 55% of games. At the same time, only 18% of Kaisar’s matches and 40% of Aktobe’s games went Over 3.5 goals, supporting the prospect of a match without an exceptionally high score. Even with Aktobe’s more offensive recent run, during which their matches produced an average of 4.0 goals, the projected total of 2.60 goals leaves a clear edge with Under 3.5 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Kaisar has a clear home advantage: they win 73% of their matches, score an average of 1.73 goals and concede just 0.73, while Aktobe win only 10% of their away games and concede 1.70 goals on average. The strongest signal concerns the first half, as the hosts were leading at the break in 55% of matches and never went into half-time trailing, whereas the visitors led in only 10% and were behind in 40%. Kaisar’s pre-half-time defensive record is particularly solid, with an average of just 0.09 goals conceded and clean sheets in 91% of matches, compared with Aktobe conceding 0.70 goals in this period. After the break, the hosts continue to score an average of 1.09 goals, while the visitors allow their opponents 1.00 goal, reinforcing the scenario of maintaining or extending the lead. Aktobe’s last five matches have been better offensively, with an average of 2.0 goals scored, but the team also conceded as many as 2.0 goals per game, so this does not undermine Kaisar’s advantage in the HT/FT scenario of leading at the break and securing the win at full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Kaisar | Aktobe | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Aktobe is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Kaisar · 1.4 pts / game - Aktobe
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Aktobe is 91% better for: goals scored per game.
0.75 goals / game - Kaisar · 1.43 goals / game - Aktobe
Kaisar is 8% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.1 goals / game - Kaisar · 1.19 goals / game - Aktobe
Kaisar scores in 55% of games (11 of 20 games), while Aktobe keeps a clean sheet in 29% (6 of 21 games).
Aktobe scores in 76% of games (16 of 21 games), while Kaisar keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kaisar
Over / Under - Aktobe
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Aktobe is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.4 pts / game - Kaisar · 1.48 pts / game - Aktobe
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kaisar - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 15%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Aktobe - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Kaisar
Aktobe
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kazakhstan Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Kaisar | Liga | Aktobe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.85 | 2.43 | ▲ 2.62 |
| Both teams scored | • 55% | 55% | ▼ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 30% | 45% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 27% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | • 65% | 66% | • 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 55% | 71% | ▲ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Kaisar's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses against Aktobe. Games average 3.67 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Kaisar vs Aktobe?
The Kazakhstan Premier League match finished Kaisar 1:2 Aktobe. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Kaisar and Aktobe?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Kaisar won 0, Aktobe won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Kaisar vs Aktobe?
Kaisar score 0.75 goals per game on average and Aktobe 1.43. The Kazakhstan Premier League average is 2.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Kaisar's matches and 52% of Aktobe's.
What form are Kaisar and Aktobe in?
Over the last 5 games Kaisar have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Aktobe 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kaisar vs Aktobe?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


