Kalamata vs Iraklis 1908: match statistics
We are dealing with an exceptionally balanced top-of-the-table clash between two league leaders; both teams are in first place and are showing identical form (2.6 points per game in their last 5 matches). Kalamata boasts an impressive home record - an 83% win rate at home, a +21 goal difference, and only 0.42 goals conceded per match. On the other hand, Iraklis 1908 remains unbeaten this entire season (18 wins, 6 draws, 0 losses) and has a perfect FTS% record away from home (0%). The key factor is the efficiency of both teams - Kalamata has a better shot conversion rate (26% vs 17%), but Iraklis takes more shots (9.67 vs 5.75) and registers more shots on target (4.08 vs 3.5). Considering the visitors' unbeaten streak, the hosts' solid defense, and the similar xG values of both sides, the most probable scenario is a hard-fought draw.
Kalamata vs Iraklis 1908: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Kalamata played against Iraklis 1908 in Super League 2 (Greece). The game was played on March 28, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Kalamata has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Iraklis 1908 has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Kalamata scores 2.13 goals per game and allows 0.50. Iraklis 1908 scores 1.83 and allows 0.61. Games in this league average 2.21 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 38% of Kalamata's games and 52% of Iraklis 1908's. The Over 2.5 rates are 42% and 52%, compared with league averages of 38% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Iraklis 1908 has the higher season xG average, 1.54 to 1.48 per game. Kalamata takes 4.0 shots per game, while Iraklis 1908 takes 8.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Kalamata leads at halftime in 71% of its games and scores 1.04 goals per game after halftime. Iraklis 1908 leads at halftime in 48% and scores 1.09 after halftime.
When the teams score
Kalamata's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Iraklis 1908, it is minutes 61-75 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Super League 2 games average 2.21 goals. Both teams score in 38% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
We are dealing with an exceptionally balanced top-of-the-table clash between two league leaders; both teams are in first place and are showing identical form (2.6 points per game in their last 5 matches). Kalamata boasts an impressive home record - an 83% win rate at home, a +21 goal difference, and only 0.42 goals conceded per match. On the other hand, Iraklis 1908 remains unbeaten this entire season (18 wins, 6 draws, 0 losses) and has a perfect FTS% record away from home (0%). The key factor is the efficiency of both teams - Kalamata has a better shot conversion rate (26% vs 17%), but Iraklis takes more shots (9.67 vs 5.75) and registers more shots on target (4.08 vs 3.5). Considering the visitors' unbeaten streak, the hosts' solid defense, and the similar xG values of both sides, the most probable scenario is a hard-fought draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The data indicates above-average solid defenses: both teams concede an average of only 0.58 goals per game, and their xG against is low (Kalamata 0.75; Iraklis 0.83). In their last 5 matches, Kalamata has not conceded a goal (GA=0.0; BTTS=0%), and Iraklis has conceded only 1 goal in total (GA=1.0; BTTS=20%), which strengthens the no-goals-from-both-sides scenario. Kalamata's high clean sheet rate (58%) and a high league CS% (70%) support the BTTS "no" market. Although both teams have good seasonal scoring averages (1.92 and 1.67) and decent offensive xG (1.56 and 1.38), their match profile is often defensively controlled. Furthermore, Kalamata's seasonal BTTS (42%) is only slightly above the league average (38%), and recent form suggests clean sheets are more likely than an exchange of blows.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The expected goals model is based on balancing attacking strength (xG for: Kalamata 1.56, Iraklis 1.38) with the opponent's defensive quality (xG against: 0.75 and 0.83), resulting in a total of approximately 2.10 goals. Both teams have very solid defensive numbers this season (average conceded 0.58 for both) and high clean sheet percentages (Kalamata 58%, Iraklis 42%), and the league as a whole is low-scoring (average 2.21; CS 70%). The last 5 matches further reinforce the under scenario: Kalamata conceded 0.0 goals/match, Iraklis 0.2, and Over 2.5 occurred in only 20% of both teams' matches. At the same time, the signal for a very high score is weak: Over 3.5 is 8% for Iraklis and 42% for Kalamata, and Over 4.5 practically does not occur (0% and 8%). Therefore, the most stable pick is Under 3.5, which secures the bet given the dominant defensive profile and low frequency of 4+ goal outcomes.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and an Iraklis win at full-time, as both teams rarely lose (0% loss rate this season), and first halves are cautious: Kalamata has a 58% half-time draw rate, while Iraklis has as high as 80% half-time draws in their last 5 matches. At the same time, Iraklis has better full-time performance indicators (2.67 PPG and 83% win rate) with a defense as solid as their opponent's (averaging 0.58 goals conceded). The goal profile and second-half statistics suggest a higher likelihood of a resolution after the break (Iraklis over 0.5 in the second half 92% and second-half PPG 2.08). Low intensity in the first half (HT avg: 0.75 away vs 1.25 home) and a high percentage of clean sheets at half-time (CS HT: 83% for Iraklis) further support a half-time draw. Therefore, the X/2 bet offers the best combination of probability and data consistency.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Kalamata | Iraklis 1908 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.37 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 1.42 | 0.52 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kalamata is 16% better for: goals scored per game.
2.13 goals / game - Kalamata · 1.83 goals / game - Iraklis 1908
Kalamata is 22% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.5 goals / game - Kalamata · 0.61 goals / game - Iraklis 1908
Kalamata scores in 92% of games (22 of 24 meczów), while Iraklis 1908 keeps a clean sheet in 48% (11 of 23 meczów).
Iraklis 1908 scores in 91% of games (21 of 23 meczów), while Kalamata keeps a clean sheet in 58% (14 of 24 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kalamata
Over / Under - Iraklis 1908
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kalamata is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.42 pts / game - Kalamata · 1.91 pts / game - Iraklis 1908
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kalamata - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 71% of games and wins 83%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Iraklis 1908 - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 48% of games and wins 74%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Kalamata
Iraklis 1908
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League 2).
Teams vs league
| Kalamata | Liga | Iraklis 1908 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.63 | 2.21 | ▲ 2.43 |
| Both teams scored | • 38% | 38% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 42% | 38% | ▲ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 58% | 35% | ▲ 48% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 64% | ▲ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 75% | 73% | ▲ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Kalamata vs Iraklis 1908?
The Super League 2 match finished Kalamata 1:0 Iraklis 1908. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kalamata vs Iraklis 1908?
Kalamata score 2.13 goals per game on average and Iraklis 1908 1.83. The Super League 2 average is 2.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Kalamata's matches and 52% of Iraklis 1908's.
What form are Kalamata and Iraklis 1908 in?
Over the last 5 games Kalamata have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Iraklis 1908 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kalamata vs Iraklis 1908?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.