Greece - Super League 2Data current as of 16 July 2026

Kalamata vs Panionios: match statistics

Kalamata crest
Kalamata
0 : 2half-time 0:0
Panionios crest
Panionios
165%(1.83)
X22%(3.00)
213%(4.10)

Kalamata is displaying impressive form as the league leaders with an undefeated record of 16 wins and 2 draws this season. The hosts are in particularly excellent form at home, winning 89% of their home matches and keeping clean sheets in 67% of games, with an average of just 0.33 goals conceded per match. Their run of five consecutive wins and a goal difference of 10 scored to only 1 conceded in the last five matches confirms their dominance. Panionios, despite a solid league position and a 67% away win rate, falls short of Kalamata in offensive terms (1.33 vs 2.56 goals per game) and has a lower conversion rate (14% vs 50%). The difference in goal difference (+20 for Kalamata at home vs +7 for Panionios away) and the hosts' undefeated streak speak in favor of their victory, although the experience and defensive solidity of the visitors offer a chance for a competitive match.

Kalamata vs Panionios: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kalamata play Panionios in Super League 2 (Greece). The match date is 15 February 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Kalamata: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Panionios: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kalamata scores 2.08 and concedes 0.48 goals per match. Panionios scores 1.35 and concedes 0.52. League average: 2.28 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kalamata 36%, Panionios 30%. Over 2.5: Kalamata 40%, Panionios 30%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Kalamata has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.31. Kalamata: 4.2 shots per match, Panionios: 5.3.

Match halves

Kalamata: half-time lead 68%, second-half goals 1.04. Panionios: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.74.

Goals by minute

Kalamata: 76-90+ (11 goals). Panionios: 61-75 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League 2: 2.28 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 2-1-0. Average goals 1.67, BTTS 33%.

Match description

Kalamata is displaying impressive form as the league leaders with an undefeated record of 16 wins and 2 draws this season. The hosts are in particularly excellent form at home, winning 89% of their home matches and keeping clean sheets in 67% of games, with an average of just 0.33 goals conceded per match. Their run of five consecutive wins and a goal difference of 10 scored to only 1 conceded in the last five matches confirms their dominance. Panionios, despite a solid league position and a 67% away win rate, falls short of Kalamata in offensive terms (1.33 vs 2.56 goals per game) and has a lower conversion rate (14% vs 50%). The difference in goal difference (+20 for Kalamata at home vs +7 for Panionios away) and the hosts' undefeated streak speak in favor of their victory, although the experience and defensive solidity of the visitors offer a chance for a competitive match.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
KalamataPanionios
5Shots4
KalamataPanionios
3Shots on target2
KalamataPanionios
0.95xG0.71
KalamataPanionios
10Corners6
KalamataPanionios
58Dangerous attacks43
KalamataPanionios
-1Fouls-1
KalamataPanionios
-1Cards-1
KalamataPanionios

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.08Goals scored / match1.35
KalamataPanionios
0.48Goals conceded / match0.52
KalamataPanionios
27%Average possession32%
KalamataPanionios
1.52Shots on target / match1.61
KalamataPanionios

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

4.16Shots per match5.35
KalamataPanionios
1.52Shots on target1.61
KalamataPanionios
50%Shot conversion25.2%
KalamataPanionios
27%Possession32%
KalamataPanionios
1.46xG for1.31
KalamataPanionios
1.02xG against0.97
KalamataPanionios

Shooting quality

Kalamata: Counter-attackingPanionios: Counter-attacking
KalamataPanionios
Accuracy (shots on target)37%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.350.24
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.370.84

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kalamata is 225% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Kalamata · 0.8 pts / match - Panionios

Kalamata
WWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
84% W12% R4% P
Season (W-D-L)
21-3-1
2.64 pts / match · goal difference +40
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
11-1-1
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Panionios
DLLLW
Season result split
61% W22% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-5-4
2.04 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-2-3
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kalamata is 54% better for: goals scored per match.

2.08 goals / match - Kalamata · 1.35 goals / match - Panionios

Kalamata is 8% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.48 goals / match - Kalamata · 0.52 goals / match - Panionios

Kalamata scoring profile: strong

Kalamata scores in 92% of matches (23 of 25 matches), while Panionios keeps a clean sheet in 61% (14 of 23 matches).

Panionios scoring profile: mixed

Panionios scores in 83% of matches (19 of 23 matches), while Kalamata keeps a clean sheet in 60% (15 of 25 matches).

52Goals scored (season)31
KalamataPanionios
12Goals conceded (season)12
KalamataPanionios
2.56Average goals in match1.87
KalamataPanionios
5Goals scored (last 5)5
KalamataPanionios
0Goals conceded (last 5)5
KalamataPanionios

How often they score at least...

92%1 goal83%
KalamataPanionios
68%2 goals35%
KalamataPanionios
28%3 goals17%
KalamataPanionios
12%4 goals0%
KalamataPanionios

How often they concede at least...

40%1 goal39%
KalamataPanionios
8%2 goals13%
KalamataPanionios
0%3 goals0%
KalamataPanionios
0%4 goals0%
KalamataPanionios

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time13%
KalamataPanionios
4%BTTS in both halves0%
KalamataPanionios
48%Scored in both halves22%
KalamataPanionios

BTTS and goal count

28%Min. 3 goals and BTTS17%
KalamataPanionios
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
KalamataPanionios
0%BTTS - last 540%
KalamataPanionios

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

72%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
KalamataPanionios
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
KalamataPanionios
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KalamataPanionios

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time57%
KalamataPanionios
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
KalamataPanionios
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
KalamataPanionios

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kalamata is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.36 pts / match - Kalamata · 1.78 pts / match - Panionios

Kalamata - half-time state
68% leading32% draw0% trailing
Panionios - half-time state
43% leading48% draw9% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.36Points per match (1st half)1.78
KalamataPanionios
1.04Goals scored (1st half)0.61
KalamataPanionios
0.16Goals conceded (1st half)0.26
KalamataPanionios
1.2Average goals (1st half)0.87
KalamataPanionios
84%Clean sheet before half-time78%
KalamataPanionios
28%No goal before half-time43%
KalamataPanionios

After half-time (2nd half)

2.2Points per match (2nd half)1.61
KalamataPanionios
1.04Goals scored (2nd half)0.74
KalamataPanionios
0.32Goals conceded (2nd half)0.26
KalamataPanionios
1.36Average goals (2nd half)1
KalamataPanionios
72%Clean sheet after half-time78%
KalamataPanionios
32%No goal after half-time52%
KalamataPanionios

Kalamata - second-half results

64% W28% R8% P
59
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+22
Goal difference (1st half)
55
Second-half points
+18
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 68% of matches and wins 84%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Panionios - second-half results

35% W57% R9% P
41
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.78
PPG before half-time
Lead holding142%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kalamata - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.80
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.60.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Panionios - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kalamata
ScoredConceded
8
1
0-15
9
0
16-30
9
3
31-45
10
4
46-60
5
2
61-75
11
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Panionios
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
4
1
16-30
6
3
31-45
5
2
46-60
7
0
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.21
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-25%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
76%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kalamata

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.62
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
160%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
49%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Panionios

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
138%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
40%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League 2).

Teams vs league

KalamataLigaPanionios
Average goals in match 2.562.28 1.87
Both teams scored 36%40% 30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%39% 30%
Clean sheets 60%34% 61%
Goal before half-time 72%64% 65%
Goal after half-time 76%75% 57%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.28
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Kalamata 2 - 1 - 0 Panionios. Average goals 1.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Kalamata vs Panionios?

The Super League 2 match finished Kalamata 0:2 Panionios. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Kalamata and Panionios?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Kalamata won 2, Panionios won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Kalamata vs Panionios?

Kalamata score 2.08 goals per game on average and Panionios 1.35. The Super League 2 average is 2.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Kalamata's matches and 30% of Panionios's.

What form are Kalamata and Panionios in?

Over the last 5 games Kalamata have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Panionios 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kalamata vs Panionios?

The statistical background for Kalamata vs Panionios — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.