Kano Pillars vs Enyimba: match statistics
Kano Pillars vs Enyimba: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Kano Pillars played against Enyimba in NPFL (Nigeria). The game was played on September 27, 2026. Venue: Sani Abacha Stadium. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Kano Pillars has 2 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Enyimba has 0 wins, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Kano Pillars scores 2.50 goals per game and allows 1.50. Enyimba scores 0.75 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 2.64 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 100% of Kano Pillars's games and 50% of Enyimba's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 50%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Enyimba has the higher season xG average, 1.96 to 1.43 per game. Kano Pillars takes 3.8 shots per game, while Enyimba takes 13.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Kano Pillars leads at halftime in 100% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. Enyimba leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Kano Pillars's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For Enyimba, it is minutes 31-45+ (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NPFL games average 2.64 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kano Pillars are unbeaten in the league, with a record of 2 wins and 1 draw, while Enyimba have lost all 3 of their matches so far and sit in 20th place. The hosts have won both of their home fixtures, scoring an average of 3.5 goals per match, whereas the visitors score just 0.5 goals away from home and have lost 100% of their matches. Kano Pillars’ advantage is also evident in chance creation: they average 6 shots on target from 9 attempts, compared with Enyimba’s 3.5 shots on target from 7 attempts. Enyimba allow opponents an average away xG of 2.29, while recording their own xG of 1.23, which favors the hosts despite Kano Pillars conceding an average of 1.5 goals at home. Recent form over the last five matches also points to Kano Pillars, who have scored 10 goals and collected 10 points, while Enyimba have lost 4 of their 5 fixtures.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal points toward BTTS - No, primarily due to Enyimba’s limited finishing: across the current sample of matches, they average only 0.5 goals, rising to 0.8 over their last five games. Kano Pillars have failed to score in 100% of the matches in the available season data, despite creating a high volume of chances, with an average xG of 3.28 and 9 shots on target per game, which significantly reduces confidence in their ability to convert opportunities. Enyimba have failed to score in 50% of their matches, while BTTS in their last five outings stood at just 20%, compared with the league average of 50%. The hosts are, however, in better attacking form, averaging 2.0 goals across their last five matches, so the most likely scenario remains one in which they score while one of the teams fails to find the net. BTTS - No does not exclusively mean a 0:0 result; the data support a scoreline such as 1:0 or 2:0 more strongly than an exchange of goals.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Kano Pillars have scored an average of 2.0 goals in their last five matches, while Enyimba have conceded 1.4 goals per game over the same period, pointing to a clear home advantage. However, the visitors have scored just 0.8 goals per match in their last five outings, despite recording an average xG of 1.87, so a very high-scoring game should not be assumed automatically. Neither team has had a match with at least four goals in their season data, while the league-wide average stands at 2.65 goals. Kano Pillars have allowed opponents an xG of around 1.36 in their last five matches, making an Enyimba goal a realistic possibility, although the match profile points more towards a total of 2-3 goals. The strongest option is Under 3.5, as four goals are required to surpass the line, while the 2.55 forecast remains clearly below it.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is Kano Pillars leading at half-time and holding on to win, as the hosts were ahead after 45 minutes in 4 of their last 5 matches, while Enyimba were trailing at that stage in 4 of 5 games. Kano averaged 1.4 goals before the break and conceded none, whereas Enyimba scored just 0.4 goals and conceded an average of 1.0. The difference is reinforced by their current full-match form: the hosts won 3 of their last 5 matches and averaged 2.0 goals, while the visitors lost 4 of 5 and scored 0.8 goals. Kano’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances, with an average xG of 3.28 compared with Enyimba’s 1.23, while shots on target stand at 9.0 versus 3.5. The risk of a turnaround by the visitors is limited by their 80% loss rate in their last five matches, which is why the 1/1 outcome receives the highest rating.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Kano Pillars | Enyimba | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 46% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.38 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 1.67 | 0.12 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kano Pillars is 233% better for: goals scored per game.
2.5 goals / game - Kano Pillars · 0.75 goals / game - Enyimba
Kano Pillars is 33% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.5 goals / game - Kano Pillars · 2 goals / game - Enyimba
Kano Pillars scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 games), while Enyimba keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 games).
Enyimba scores in 50% of games (2 of 4 games), while Kano Pillars keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kano Pillars
Over / Under - Enyimba
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kano Pillars is 300% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
3 pts / game - Kano Pillars · 0.75 pts / game - Enyimba
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kano Pillars - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 100% of games and wins 50%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 1.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Enyimba - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 3.00 | 0.75 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.5 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 2.3 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 75% | 75% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 0% | 50% |
| Goal difference | +7 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.75 | 0.50 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.3 | 0.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.3 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 25% | 25% |
| No goal | 75% | 50% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Kano Pillars
Enyimba
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).
Teams vs league
| Kano Pillars | Liga | Enyimba | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.00 | 2.64 | ▲ 2.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 51% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 75% | 49% | • 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 29% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 76% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 78% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Kano Pillars's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Enyimba. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Kano Pillars vs Enyimba?
The NPFL match finished Kano Pillars 0:0 Enyimba. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Kano Pillars and Enyimba?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Kano Pillars won 1, Enyimba won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Kano Pillars vs Enyimba?
Kano Pillars score 2.50 goals per game on average and Enyimba 0.75. The NPFL average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Kano Pillars's matches and 50% of Enyimba's.
What form are Kano Pillars and Enyimba in?
Over the last 5 games Kano Pillars have a 2-2-0 record (2.00 points per game) and Enyimba 0-0-4 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kano Pillars vs Enyimba?
The statistical background for Kano Pillars vs Enyimba — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


