Nigeria - NPFLData current as of 17 July 2026

Kano Pillars vs Remo Stars: match statistics

Kano Pillars crest
Kano Pillars
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Remo Stars crest
Remo Stars
165%(0.00)
X20%(0.00)
215%(0.00)

Kano Pillars clearly dominate in home matches with a 58% win rate and an impressive goal difference of +6, while Remo Stars present catastrophic away form with just 8% wins and a -14 goal difference. The hosts average 2.25 xG in home games while conceding only 0.73 xG, highlighting their offensive superiority and defensive solidity at their own stadium. Remo Stars average just 0.5 goals scored and 1.67 conceded in away matches, and their run of 11 consecutive away defeats is alarming. Moreover, the visitors have not kept a single clean sheet on the road all season and in 58% of their matches failed to score. Given such a stark contrast in the home and away form of both teams, a home win is the most likely scenario.

Kano Pillars vs Remo Stars: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kano Pillars play Remo Stars in NPFL (Nigeria). The match date is 8 February 2026 at 15:30. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Kano Pillars: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Remo Stars: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kano Pillars scores 0.97 and concedes 1.03 goals per match. Remo Stars scores 1.11 and concedes 1.24. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kano Pillars 34%, Remo Stars 55%. Over 2.5: Kano Pillars 37%, Remo Stars 45%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Remo Stars has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.32. Kano Pillars: 2.7 shots per match, Remo Stars: 7.5.

Match halves

Kano Pillars: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.47. Remo Stars: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.63.

Goals by minute

Kano Pillars: 31-45+ (10 goals). Remo Stars: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NPFL: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Kano Pillars clearly dominate in home matches with a 58% win rate and an impressive goal difference of +6, while Remo Stars present catastrophic away form with just 8% wins and a -14 goal difference. The hosts average 2.25 xG in home games while conceding only 0.73 xG, highlighting their offensive superiority and defensive solidity at their own stadium. Remo Stars average just 0.5 goals scored and 1.67 conceded in away matches, and their run of 11 consecutive away defeats is alarming. Moreover, the visitors have not kept a single clean sheet on the road all season and in 58% of their matches failed to score. Given such a stark contrast in the home and away form of both teams, a home win is the most likely scenario.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
-1Shots-1
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
-1Shots on target-1
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
0xG0
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
-1Corners-1
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
0Dangerous attacks0
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
-1Fouls-1
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
-1Cards-1
Kano PillarsRemo Stars

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Kano PillarsRemo Stars
0.97Goals scored / match1.11
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
1.03Goals conceded / match1.24
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
16%Average possession39%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
0.37Shots on target / match3.24
Kano PillarsRemo Stars

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

2.68Shots per match7.55
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
0.37Shots on target3.24
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
36.3%Shot conversion14.6%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
16%Possession39%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
1.32xG for1.37
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
1.45xG against1.17
Kano PillarsRemo Stars

Shooting quality

Kano Pillars: Counter-attackingRemo Stars: Counter-attacking
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
Accuracy (shots on target)14%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.490.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)2.620.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Remo Stars is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Kano Pillars · 1.4 pts / match - Remo Stars

Kano Pillars
LWLWL
Season result split
39% W16% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-6-17
1.34 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
14-3-2
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.80Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Remo Stars
LWLWD
Season result split
37% W13% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-5-19
1.24 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-16
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LDLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Remo Stars is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

0.97 goals / match - Kano Pillars · 1.11 goals / match - Remo Stars

Kano Pillars is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.03 goals / match - Kano Pillars · 1.24 goals / match - Remo Stars

Kano Pillars scoring profile: strong

Kano Pillars scores in 63% of matches (24 of 38 matches), while Remo Stars keeps a clean sheet in 21% (8 of 38 matches).

Remo Stars scoring profile: strong

Remo Stars scores in 76% of matches (29 of 38 matches), while Kano Pillars keeps a clean sheet in 37% (14 of 38 matches).

37Goals scored (season)42
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
39Goals conceded (season)47
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
2Average goals in match2.34
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
4Goals scored (last 5)8
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
Kano PillarsRemo Stars

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal76%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
24%2 goals29%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
8%3 goals5%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
3%4 goals0%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal79%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
29%2 goals32%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
8%3 goals11%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
3%4 goals3%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time26%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
11%Scored in both halves11%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
40%BTTS - last 580%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time34%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars

2nd half

68%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kano Pillars is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.34 pts / match - Kano Pillars · 1 pts / match - Remo Stars

Kano Pillars - half-time state
29% leading47% draw24% trailing
Remo Stars - half-time state
16% leading53% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.34Points per match (1st half)1
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.47
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
0.39Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
0.89Average goals (1st half)1.11
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
63%Clean sheet before half-time47%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
66%No goal before half-time61%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars

After half-time (2nd half)

1.21Points per match (2nd half)1.39
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.61
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
1.11Average goals (2nd half)1.24
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
58%Clean sheet after half-time55%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars
61%No goal after half-time53%
Kano PillarsRemo Stars

Kano Pillars - second-half results

29% W34% R37% P
51
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.34
PPG before half-time
Lead holding134%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Remo Stars - second-half results

37% W29% R34% P
38
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding231%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kano Pillars - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.41.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Remo Stars - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kano Pillars
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
5
7
16-30
10
5
31-45
3
4
46-60
6
7
61-75
9
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Remo Stars
ScoredConceded
6
9
0-15
1
7
16-30
11
8
31-45
3
6
46-60
9
5
61-75
12
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-54%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kano Pillars

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
178%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Remo Stars

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
191%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).

Teams vs league

Kano PillarsLigaRemo Stars
Average goals in match 2.002.02 2.34
Both teams scored 34%38% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 37%34% 45%
Clean sheets 37%37% 21%
Goal before half-time 58%61% 66%
Goal after half-time 68%64% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
0.58
Away goals / match
+148%
Home attack advantage
+60%
Home defence advantage
+52%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Kano Pillars 0 - 0 - 1 Remo Stars. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Remo Stars FC
1 : 0
Kano Pillars FC

FAQ

What was the result of Kano Pillars vs Remo Stars?

The NPFL match finished Kano Pillars 1:0 Remo Stars. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kano Pillars vs Remo Stars?

Kano Pillars score 0.97 goals per game on average and Remo Stars 1.11. The NPFL average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 34% of Kano Pillars's matches and 55% of Remo Stars's.

What form are Kano Pillars and Remo Stars in?

Over the last 5 games Kano Pillars have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Remo Stars 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kano Pillars vs Remo Stars?

The statistical background for Kano Pillars vs Remo Stars — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.