Finland - YkkösliigaMustapekka AreenaData current as of 04 August 2026

KäPa vs EIF: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

KäPa vs EIF: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KäPa play EIF in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 8 August 2026. Venue: Mustapekka Areena.

Current form

KäPa: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. EIF: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

KäPa scores 1.12 and concedes 1.71 goals per match. EIF scores 1.35 and concedes 1.76. League average: 2.51 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KäPa 65%, EIF 47%. Over 2.5: KäPa 71%, EIF 59%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

EIF has higher xG: 1.39 vs 1.38. KäPa: 11.1 shots per match, EIF: 10.8.

Match halves

KäPa: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.47. EIF: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.76.

Goals by minute

KäPa: 0-15 (5 goals). EIF: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.51 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-4. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 75%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(2.63)
(3.21)
(2.22)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.12Goals scored / match1.35
KäPaEIF
1.71Goals conceded / match1.76
KäPaEIF
49%Average possession50%
KäPaEIF
3.47Shots on target / match4.06
KäPaEIF

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.12Shots per match10.82
KäPaEIF
3.47Shots on target4.06
KäPaEIF
10.1%Shot conversion12.5%
KäPaEIF
49%Possession50%
KäPaEIF
1.38xG for1.39
KäPaEIF
1.59xG against1.49
KäPaEIF

Shooting quality

KäPa: BalancedEIF: Balanced
KäPaEIF
Accuracy (shots on target)31%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

EIF is 300% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - KäPa · 0.8 pts / match - EIF

KäPa
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
24% W24% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-9
0.94 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
EIF
LLLDW
Season result split
35% W12% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-9
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-6
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

EIF is 21% better for: goals scored per match.

1.12 goals / match - KäPa · 1.35 goals / match - EIF

KäPa scoring profile: strong

KäPa scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while EIF keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

EIF scoring profile: very strong

EIF scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while KäPa keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 matches).

19Goals scored (season)23
KäPaEIF
29Goals conceded (season)30
KäPaEIF
2.82Average goals in match3.12
KäPaEIF
5Goals scored (last 5)3
KäPaEIF
12Goals conceded (last 5)7
KäPaEIF

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal71%
KäPaEIF
35%2 goals35%
KäPaEIF
6%3 goals18%
KäPaEIF
0%4 goals6%
KäPaEIF

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal71%
KäPaEIF
65%2 goals47%
KäPaEIF
18%3 goals35%
KäPaEIF
0%4 goals18%
KäPaEIF

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time24%
KäPaEIF
0%BTTS in both halves18%
KäPaEIF
18%Scored in both halves24%
KäPaEIF

BTTS and goal count

65%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
KäPaEIF
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
KäPaEIF
80%BTTS - last 520%
KäPaEIF

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
KäPaEIF
59%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
KäPaEIF
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
KäPaEIF

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
KäPaEIF
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
KäPaEIF
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time41%
KäPaEIF

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KäPa is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.24 pts / match - KäPa · 1.12 pts / match - EIF

KäPa - half-time state
29% leading35% draw35% trailing
EIF - half-time state
24% leading41% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per match (1st half)1.12
KäPaEIF
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.59
KäPaEIF
0.82Goals conceded (1st half)0.65
KäPaEIF
1.47Average goals (1st half)1.24
KäPaEIF
53%Clean sheet before half-time59%
KäPaEIF
47%No goal before half-time59%
KäPaEIF

After half-time (2nd half)

0.65Points per match (2nd half)1.29
KäPaEIF
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.76
KäPaEIF
0.88Goals conceded (2nd half)1.12
KäPaEIF
1.35Average goals (2nd half)1.88
KäPaEIF
35%Clean sheet after half-time41%
KäPaEIF
65%No goal after half-time47%
KäPaEIF

KäPa - second-half results

6% W47% R47% P
21
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding83%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 24%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

EIF - second-half results

35% W24% R41% P
19
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.12
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KäPa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.200.80
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.60.8
Average goals in match2.01.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-6-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
EIF - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.40
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.01.4
Average goals in match0.41.6
1 goal20%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+2-6
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KäPa
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
3
7
16-30
3
5
31-45
4
3
46-60
3
2
61-75
1
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

EIF
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
3
2
16-30
5
6
31-45
4
7
46-60
1
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.97
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
118%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+35%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KäPa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
151%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.74
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
5% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
5%

EIF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

KäPaLigaEIF
Average goals in match 2.822.51 3.12
Both teams scored 65%46% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 71%45% 59%
Clean sheets 12%31% 29%
Goal before half-time 76%62% 59%
Goal after half-time 71%73% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.51
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): KäPa 0 - 0 - 4 EIF. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 75% matches.

EIF
1 : 0
KäPa
Ekenäs IF
4 : 1
Käpylän Pallo
Käpylän Pallo
1 : 3
Ekenäs IF
Ekenäs IF
4 : 2
Käpylän Pallo

FAQ

When do KäPa and EIF play?

KäPa face EIF on 8 August 2026 in Ykkösliiga at Mustapekka Areena. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between KäPa and EIF?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches KäPa won 0, EIF won 4 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KäPa vs EIF?

KäPa score 1.12 goals per game on average and EIF 1.35. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 65% of KäPa's matches and 47% of EIF's.

What form are KäPa and EIF in?

Over the last 5 games KäPa have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and EIF 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KäPa vs EIF?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KäPa vs EIF: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.