Finland - YkkösliigaData current as of 22 July 2026

KäPa vs JIPPO: match statistics

KäPa crest
KäPa
0 : 2half-time 0:2
JIPPO crest
JIPPO

KäPa vs JIPPO: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KäPa play JIPPO in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 2 May 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

KäPa: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. JIPPO: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

KäPa scores 1.13 and concedes 1.60 goals per match. JIPPO scores 1.47 and concedes 0.73. League average: 2.47 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KäPa 60%, JIPPO 47%. Over 2.5: KäPa 67%, JIPPO 40%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

JIPPO has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.40. KäPa: 11.1 shots per match, JIPPO: 13.6.

Match halves

KäPa: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.53. JIPPO: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

KäPa: 46-60 (4 goals). JIPPO: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

4 H2H matches: 0-1-3. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 75%.

Match description

JIPPO has a clear advantage in chance creation — on the road they average 16 shots and xG 1.56, while KäPa at home average only 5 shots and xG 0.96, which indicates more and higher-quality opportunities for the visitors. Defensively the visitors look better in terms of goals conceded: JIPPO concedes on average 1 goal away, while KäPa concedes 2 goals at home; although xG against is 1.34 for JIPPO versus 1.10 for KäPa, the actual goals conceded (1 vs 2) favor the visitors’ defensive effectiveness. In the last 5 matches KäPa have scored 11 goals and average 2.2 points per game, compared to 4 goals and 1.6 points per game for JIPPO, which shows stronger recent offensive form for the home side but also greater instability (KäPa conceded 7 goals in that period vs 3 for the visitors). Finishing efficiency also favors KäPa (40% conversion at home versus 13% for JIPPO), however it comes from a smaller sample of shots and may be hard to sustain. Considering the higher volume and quality of the visitors’ chances (16 shots and xG 1.56) and JIPPO’s lower average goals conceded (1 vs 2), I predict a win for the visitors.

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
KäPaJIPPO
14Shots13
KäPaJIPPO
3Shots on target4
KäPaJIPPO
1.46xG1.5
KäPaJIPPO
9Corners8
KäPaJIPPO
51Dangerous attacks56
KäPaJIPPO
1Fouls1
KäPaJIPPO
3Cards3
KäPaJIPPO

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.13Goals scored / match1.47
KäPaJIPPO
1.6Goals conceded / match0.73
KäPaJIPPO
50%Average possession54%
KäPaJIPPO
3.8Shots on target / match5.13
KäPaJIPPO

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.13Shots per match13.6
KäPaJIPPO
3.8Shots on target5.13
KäPaJIPPO
10.2%Shot conversion10.8%
KäPaJIPPO
50%Possession54%
KäPaJIPPO
1.4xG for1.67
KäPaJIPPO
1.55xG against1.08
KäPaJIPPO

Shooting quality

KäPa: BalancedJIPPO: Balanced
KäPaJIPPO
Accuracy (shots on target)34%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

JIPPO is 175% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - KäPa · 2.2 pts / match - JIPPO

KäPa
LWLDL
Season result split
27% W27% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-7
1.07 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
JIPPO
WDDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
47% W40% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-6-2
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WLDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.77Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

JIPPO is 30% better for: goals scored per match.

1.13 goals / match - KäPa · 1.47 goals / match - JIPPO

JIPPO is 119% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.6 goals / match - KäPa · 0.73 goals / match - JIPPO

KäPa scoring profile: mixed

KäPa scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).

JIPPO scoring profile: very strong

JIPPO scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while KäPa keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).

17Goals scored (season)22
KäPaJIPPO
24Goals conceded (season)11
KäPaJIPPO
2.73Average goals in match2.2
KäPaJIPPO
6Goals scored (last 5)12
KäPaJIPPO
11Goals conceded (last 5)5
KäPaJIPPO

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal73%
KäPaJIPPO
40%2 goals47%
KäPaJIPPO
7%3 goals27%
KäPaJIPPO
0%4 goals0%
KäPaJIPPO

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal53%
KäPaJIPPO
60%2 goals13%
KäPaJIPPO
13%3 goals7%
KäPaJIPPO
0%4 goals0%
KäPaJIPPO

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time7%
KäPaJIPPO
0%BTTS in both halves7%
KäPaJIPPO
20%Scored in both halves13%
KäPaJIPPO

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
KäPaJIPPO
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
KäPaJIPPO
60%BTTS - last 560%
KäPaJIPPO

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
KäPaJIPPO
53%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
KäPaJIPPO
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
KäPaJIPPO

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
KäPaJIPPO
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
KäPaJIPPO
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
KäPaJIPPO

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

JIPPO is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.4 pts / match - KäPa · 1.47 pts / match - JIPPO

KäPa - half-time state
33% leading40% draw27% trailing
JIPPO - half-time state
33% leading47% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.4Points per match (1st half)1.47
KäPaJIPPO
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.67
KäPaJIPPO
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
KäPaJIPPO
1.27Average goals (1st half)1
KäPaJIPPO
60%Clean sheet before half-time73%
KäPaJIPPO
53%No goal before half-time60%
KäPaJIPPO

After half-time (2nd half)

0.67Points per match (2nd half)1.53
KäPaJIPPO
0.53Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
KäPaJIPPO
0.93Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
KäPaJIPPO
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.2
KäPaJIPPO
33%Clean sheet after half-time67%
KäPaJIPPO
60%No goal after half-time53%
KäPaJIPPO

KäPa - second-half results

7% W47% R47% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 27%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

JIPPO - second-half results

33% W53% R13% P
22
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding142%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KäPa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match1.40.8
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-6+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
JIPPO - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.60
Goals scored / match1.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+5+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KäPa
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
3
5
16-30
3
3
31-45
4
3
46-60
3
2
61-75
1
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

JIPPO
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
5
3
31-45
4
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
7
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.46
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+22%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KäPa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
142%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

JIPPO

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
55%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

KäPaLigaJIPPO
Average goals in match 2.732.47 2.20
Both teams scored 60%44% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%44% 40%
Clean sheets 13%31% 47%
Goal before half-time 73%60% 60%
Goal after half-time 73%73% 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.47
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): KäPa 0 - 1 - 3 JIPPO. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 75% matches.

JIPPO
3 : 0
KäPa
JIPPO Joensuu
2 : 1
Käpylän Pallo
JIPPO Joensuu
3 : 1
Käpylän Pallo
Käpylän Pallo
1 : 1
JIPPO Joensuu

FAQ

What was the result of KäPa vs JIPPO?

The Ykkösliiga match finished KäPa 0:2 JIPPO. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KäPa and JIPPO?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches KäPa won 0, JIPPO won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KäPa vs JIPPO?

KäPa score 1.13 goals per game on average and JIPPO 1.47. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 60% of KäPa's matches and 47% of JIPPO's.

What form are KäPa and JIPPO in?

Over the last 5 games KäPa have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and JIPPO 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KäPa vs JIPPO?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.