KäPa vs JIPPO: match statistics
KäPa vs JIPPO: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KäPa played against JIPPO in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on May 2, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
KäPa has 2 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. JIPPO has 2 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
KäPa scores 1.75 goals per game and allows 1.25. JIPPO scores 0.75 and allows 0.25. Games in this league average 1.95 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 75% of KäPa's games and 25% of JIPPO's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 25%, compared with league averages of 32% for BTTS and 36% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
JIPPO has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.16 per game. KäPa takes 8.3 shots per game, while JIPPO takes 13.3.
First-half and second-half trends
KäPa leads at halftime in 100% of its games and scores 0.25 goals per game after halftime. JIPPO leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.75 after halftime.
When the teams score
KäPa's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). For JIPPO, it is minutes 46-60 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 1.95 goals. Both teams score in 32% of games, and 36% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
JIPPO has a clear advantage in chance creation — on the road they average 16 shots and xG 1.56, while KäPa at home average only 5 shots and xG 0.96, which indicates more and higher-quality opportunities for the visitors. Defensively the visitors look better in terms of goals conceded: JIPPO concedes on average 1 goal away, while KäPa concedes 2 goals at home; although xG against is 1.34 for JIPPO versus 1.10 for KäPa, the actual goals conceded (1 vs 2) favor the visitors’ defensive effectiveness. In the last 5 matches KäPa have scored 11 goals and average 2.2 points per game, compared to 4 goals and 1.6 points per game for JIPPO, which shows stronger recent offensive form for the home side but also greater instability (KäPa conceded 7 goals in that period vs 3 for the visitors). Finishing efficiency also favors KäPa (40% conversion at home versus 13% for JIPPO), however it comes from a smaller sample of shots and may be hard to sustain. Considering the higher volume and quality of the visitors’ chances (16 shots and xG 1.56) and JIPPO’s lower average goals conceded (1 vs 2), I predict a win for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict BTTS - Yes. JIPPO averages 2.0 goals per game and has 100% BTTS in away matches, with a season xG_for of 1.56. KäPa has only 0.33 goals per game this season and officially 100% seasonCS at home (seasonCS 100% and seasonBTTS_home 0%), but in the last 5 games KäPa scored 11 goals (2.2 per game) and had BTTS in 80% of those matches, indicating a form shift. Chance levels are supported by xG – both teams have season xG_for of 1.56, and in the last 5 matches KäPa’s xG was 1.26 vs JIPPO’s 1.39. KäPa averages 4.33 shots on target per game vs 2.0 for JIPPO, but JIPPO is more efficient with a 13% conversion rate vs 3%, so the visitors are more clinical. The counterargument is the league’s low BTTS rate (32%) and high clean sheet percentage (84%), which lowers the overall BTTS probability for this fixture. Considering JIPPO’s 100% away BTTS, KäPa’s 80% BTTS in the last 5, and matched xG of 1.56–1.56, I estimate BTTS probability at ~60% vs 40% and recommend "yes".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
A combined xG model gives expected goals of 1.45 for KäPa and 1.21 for JIPPO, totaling 2.66 goals. Both teams have average attacking xG of 1.56, but the home defense concedes 0.85 xG against versus 1.34 for the visitors, suggesting KäPa will create more chances against JIPPO’s weaker backline. In the last 5 matches KäPa scored 11 goals (2.2 per game) and JIPPO 4 goals (0.8 per game); hosts average 12.33 shots with 4.33 on target, while guests register 16 shots but only 2 on target and a higher conversion rate 13% vs 3%, which increases unpredictability but does not lower the total goals projection. Additionally, in the hosts’ last 5 matches the share of games over 2.5 goals is 80%, and the league average is 2.05 goals per game, so the expected 2.66 is well above the 1.5 threshold and slightly above 2.5. Based on this I recommend Over 1.5 (strongest signal) with a high probability; Over 2.5 is moderately likely, and Over 3.5 has a low chance.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
In the last five matches the home team led at the break in 5 of 5 (100%) and averaged 1.2 goals by half-time while conceding 0.0, which strongly supports a home lead at the break. Over the season the hosts concede no goals (0.0 conceded per match on average) and have 100% clean sheets, whereas the visitors score 2.0 goals per match on average but 0.0 by half-time, suggesting the visitors’ goals predominantly occur after the break. Both teams’ xG are similar at 1.56 (1.56 vs 1.56), however the home side has a lower xG against of 0.85 compared to 1.34 for the visitors, giving the hosts a defensive edge and increasing the likelihood of maintaining the lead. In light of these figures (100% leads at half-time in the last five, 100% seasonal clean sheets and the hosts’ 67% season full-match win rate) the strongest signal is the 1/1 scenario, therefore it receives the highest probability.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KäPa | JIPPO | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.50 | 0.20 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KäPa is 133% better for: goals scored per game.
1.75 goals / game - KäPa · 0.75 goals / game - JIPPO
JIPPO is 400% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.25 goals / game - KäPa · 0.25 goals / game - JIPPO
KäPa scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 meczów), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 75% (3 of 4 meczów).
JIPPO scores in 50% of games (2 of 4 meczów), while KäPa keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KäPa
Over / Under - JIPPO
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KäPa is 300% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
3 pts / game - KäPa · 0.75 pts / game - JIPPO
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KäPa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 100% of games and wins 50%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 1.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
JIPPO - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 3.00 | 0.25 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.5 | 0.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.3 |
| Average goals per game | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 25% |
| No goal | 0% | 75% |
| Goal difference | +6 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.75 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 25% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 25% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 50% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KäPa
JIPPO
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| KäPa | Liga | JIPPO | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.00 | 1.95 | ▼ 1.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 32% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 75% | 36% | ▼ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 41% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 64% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 75% | 55% | ▼ 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from KäPa's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses against JIPPO. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of KäPa vs JIPPO?
The Ykkösliiga match finished KäPa 0:2 JIPPO. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between KäPa and JIPPO?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches KäPa won 0, JIPPO won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before KäPa vs JIPPO?
KäPa score 1.75 goals per game on average and JIPPO 0.75. The Ykkösliiga average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 75% of KäPa's matches and 25% of JIPPO's.
What form are KäPa and JIPPO in?
Over the last 5 games KäPa have a 2-2-0 record (2.00 points per game) and JIPPO 2-2-0 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KäPa vs JIPPO?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


