KäPa vs Klubi-04: match statistics
KäPa vs Klubi-04: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KäPa played against Klubi-04 in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on July 21, 2026. Venue: Mustapekka Areena. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
KäPa has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Klubi-04 has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
KäPa scores 1.21 goals per game and allows 1.57. Klubi-04 scores 0.86 and allows 1.29. Games in this league average 2.47 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 64% of KäPa's games and 57% of Klubi-04's. The Over 2.5 rates are 71% and 29%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KäPa has the higher season xG average, 1.35 to 1.23 per game. KäPa takes 10.7 shots per game, while Klubi-04 takes 9.3.
First-half and second-half trends
KäPa leads at halftime in 36% of its games and scores 0.57 goals per game after halftime. Klubi-04 leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.57 after halftime.
When the teams score
KäPa's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). For Klubi-04, it is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.47 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
KäPa has a slight attacking edge at home — averaging 1.43 goals per game with xG 1.44 and 11.57 shots, versus Klubi-04 who average 1.00 goals away with xG 1.12 and 8.33 attempts. Defensively the teams are similar: KäPa concedes 1.43 goals at home on average, while Klubi-04 concedes 1.33 away, but the visitors have yet to record an away win (0% away wins) and draw 67% of their away matches. In the last 5 matches Klubi-04 average 1.2 points per game, whereas KäPa have 0.8 points per game, indicating better form for the visitors. Additionally KäPa have higher possession share (53% vs 50%) and more shots on target per game (4.14 vs 3.83), which increases the hosts’ chance of scoring. Considering the hosts’ offensive advantage and the visitors’ high draw rate, the forecast is a home win, albeit with a significant risk of a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I select BTTS - Yes as the most likely outcome, assigning it 72% versus 28% for No. Klubi-04 has a season BTTS rate of 83% and a season clean sheet percentage of 0%, meaning the visitors very rarely keep a clean sheet; KäPa has a season BTTS of 38%, but BTTS occurred in 80% of their last 5 matches. In the last 5 matches both teams averaged 1.4 goals each (7 goals in 5 matches), with KäPa conceding an average of 2.2 goals versus 1.4 conceded by Klubi-04, which increases the likelihood that both will score at least once. xG and shots data confirm an offensive profile: season xG for KäPa is 1.32 versus 1.12 for Klubi-04, xG against 1.43 vs 1.55, average shots on target 3.38 vs 3.83 and conversion rate 8% vs 12% — both teams create chances and have realistic scoring potential. Considering Klubi-04’s 83% BTTS, KäPa’s 80% BTTS in the last 5 matches and the visitors’ 0% clean sheets, I assign a higher probability to BTTS - Yes (72%) than No (28%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Home xG is 1.32 and xG against the visitors is 1.55, which averaged simply gives about 1.44 expected goals for KäPa; similarly visitors’ xG 1.12 versus xG against the home side 1.43 gives about 1.28 for Klubi‑04, total ≈2.72. In the last 5 matches KäPa scored 7 and conceded 11 goals (total 18, average 3.6 goals per match), while Klubi‑04 in their last five had 7+7 (total 14, average 2.8), which confirms an uptick in goals in current form. Season-to-date the share of matches over 1.5 goals is 63% for KäPa and 83% for Klubi‑04, while over 2.5 is only 25% and 33% respectively, so high totals are more evident in recent form than across the whole season. With an expected goals sum ≈2.72 the Poisson model gives ~75% probability for Over 1.5, ~51% for Over 2.5 and ~29% for Over 3.5; therefore the strongest signal is a bet on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely outcome is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X): the away side finished matches level in 67% of cases and recorded no wins this season (0% wins), so a final draw is a strong signal. At half-time a draw also predominates — the visitors were level at the break in 67% of matches, while the home team trailed at half-time in 50% of situations, which limits the chance of the hosts holding a lead after 45 minutes. At the same time there is high activity in second halves: the visitors have 83% of matches with goals at both ends and on average concede 1.17 goals after the break, while the home side scores on average 1.25 in second halves, favoring an equalizer or maintenance of the draw. The difference in quality of chances is small — home xG 1.32 versus away xG 1.12 — so the lack of a decisive advantage increases the probability of the X/X scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KäPa | Klubi-04 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Klubi-04 is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - KäPa · 1.2 pts / game - Klubi-04
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KäPa is 41% better for: goals scored per game.
1.21 goals / game - KäPa · 0.86 goals / game - Klubi-04
Klubi-04 is 22% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.57 goals / game - KäPa · 1.29 goals / game - Klubi-04
KäPa scores in 71% of games (10 of 14 meczów), while Klubi-04 keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 meczów).
Klubi-04 scores in 64% of games (9 of 14 meczów), while KäPa keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KäPa
Over / Under - Klubi-04
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KäPa is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - KäPa · 1.07 pts / game - Klubi-04
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KäPa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 29%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Klubi-04 - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 7%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KäPa
Klubi-04
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| KäPa | Liga | Klubi-04 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.79 | 2.47 | ▼ 2.14 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 45% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 71% | 45% | ▼ 29% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 31% | ▼ 7% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 59% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 79% | 74% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from KäPa's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Klubi-04. Games average 2.75 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of KäPa vs Klubi-04?
The Ykkösliiga match finished KäPa 0:2 Klubi-04. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between KäPa and Klubi-04?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches KäPa won 2, Klubi-04 won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before KäPa vs Klubi-04?
KäPa score 1.21 goals per game on average and Klubi-04 0.86. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 64% of KäPa's matches and 57% of Klubi-04's.
What form are KäPa and Klubi-04 in?
Over the last 5 games KäPa have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Klubi-04 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KäPa vs Klubi-04?
The statistical background for KäPa vs Klubi-04 — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


