Kapfenberger SV vs Rapid Wien II: match statistics
Kapfenberger SV vs Rapid Wien II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Kapfenberger SV played against Rapid Wien II in 2. Liga (Austria). The game was played on April 6, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Kapfenberger SV has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Rapid Wien II has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Kapfenberger SV scores 1.18 goals per game and allows 1.82. Rapid Wien II scores 1.18 and allows 1.59. Games in this league average 2.73 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 64% of Kapfenberger SV's games and 55% of Rapid Wien II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 64% and 45%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Rapid Wien II has the higher season xG average, 1.25 to 1.20 per game. Kapfenberger SV takes 9.9 shots per game, while Rapid Wien II takes 9.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Kapfenberger SV leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.86 goals per game after halftime. Rapid Wien II leads at halftime in 32% and scores 0.64 after halftime.
When the teams score
Kapfenberger SV's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). For Rapid Wien II, it is minutes 61-75 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
2. Liga games average 2.73 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I expect a home win. Kapfenberger averages 11.1 shots per home match, 4.8 on target, and 1.4 goals per game at home, while Rapid II on the road records 9.09 shots (3.18 on target) and 1.27 goals per match. Defensively the hosts also perform better — Kapfenberger concedes 1.3 goals on average at home versus 1.73 conceded by Rapid II away, and Rapid II’s away loss rate reaches 64% compared to 30% losses for Kapfenberger at home. xG indicates a home advantage: Kapfenberger generates 1.36 xG at home versus 1.15 xG for Rapid II away, while both teams allow a similar 1.81 xG against, suggesting the hosts convert created chances into goals more efficiently. Despite identical returns of 1.4 points per match over the last 5 games and comparable runs (2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses), the higher number of shots on target and lower average goals conceded at their own stadium favor Kapfenberger.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes because Kapfenberger has a seasonal BTTS rate of 67% and as high as 80% in the last 5 matches, while Rapid Wien II records 36% seasonally and 40% in the last 5, indicating a strong tendency for the home side to be involved in games with both teams scoring. Goal figures support this direction: Kapfenberger averages 1.33 goals scored and concedes 1.33 per match, Rapid scores 1.27 and concedes 1.73, so both teams regularly both score and allow goals. xG also shows both sides create and concede chances — attacking xG 1.33 vs 1.15 and xG against 1.67 and 1.81, i.e. on average over 1.6 xG conceded per match. Additionally, Kapfenberger kept a clean sheet in only 8% of season games (Rapid 27%), and the league-wide BTTS level is 53%, which together increases the probability of both teams scoring at least once. Consequently I assess the chance of BTTS at 68% versus 32% for No Goal and recommend the “yes” selection as the strongest signal from the data.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Using a simple model combining the home’s attacking xG and the opponent’s defensive xG ((1.33 + 1.81)/2 for the home side and (1.15 + 1.67)/2 for the away side) I get 1.57 expected goals for Kapfenberger and 1.41 for Rapid Wien II, totaling 2.98 expected goals. Kapfenberger’s matches have finished over 1.5 goals in 92% of cases, and Rapid II in 73% — on average this yields about an 85% chance of Over 1.5 goals, which is the strongest signal. Over 2.5 goals also looks plausible: season values are 42% for the home team and 55% for the away team, and in the last 5 matches Kapfenberger had Over 2.5 in 80% of games, so I estimate the probability at ~62%. Over 3.5 is less likely (seasonal 25%/45% and combined xG ~2.98) so I estimate ~30% for the 3.5 line; the recommendation is to play Over 1.5 as the strongest and most reliable signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistical analysis indicates the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a Kapfenberger SV victory at full-time (X/1). The home side is stronger after the break: they score on average 0.75 goals in the second half versus 0.55 for Rapid Wien II, and points gained after half-time are 1.17 compared to 0.91, giving them an advantage late on. Draws at the break occur more frequently — in 60% of the last five matches the hosts were level at half-time, and the average goals by half in those five games are 1.4 for the hosts and 0.8 for the visitors, which favors maintaining a draw at the break. Additionally, Kapfenberger have a higher xG (1.33 vs 1.15) and more on-target shots (4.42 vs 3.18), so I expect the even first period to be decided in the hosts’ favor after the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Kapfenberger SV | Rapid Wien II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rapid Wien II is 14% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.82 goals / game - Kapfenberger SV · 1.59 goals / game - Rapid Wien II
Kapfenberger SV scores in 68% of games (15 of 22 meczów), while Rapid Wien II keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 meczów).
Rapid Wien II scores in 68% of games (15 of 22 meczów), while Kapfenberger SV keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kapfenberger SV
Over / Under - Rapid Wien II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rapid Wien II is 66% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.82 pts / game - Kapfenberger SV · 1.36 pts / game - Rapid Wien II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kapfenberger SV - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Rapid Wien II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 27%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Kapfenberger SV
Rapid Wien II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Kapfenberger SV | Liga | Rapid Wien II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.00 | 2.73 | • 2.77 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 53% | ▲ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 64% | 50% | ▼ 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 27% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 68% | 70% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 76% | • 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Kapfenberger SV's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Rapid Wien II. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Kapfenberger SV vs Rapid Wien II?
The 2. Liga match finished Kapfenberger SV 0:2 Rapid Wien II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kapfenberger SV vs Rapid Wien II?
Kapfenberger SV score 1.18 goals per game on average and Rapid Wien II 1.18. The 2. Liga average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Kapfenberger SV's matches and 55% of Rapid Wien II's.
What form are Kapfenberger SV and Rapid Wien II in?
Over the last 5 games Kapfenberger SV have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Rapid Wien II 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kapfenberger SV vs Rapid Wien II?
The statistical background for Kapfenberger SV vs Rapid Wien II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


