Karcag SE vs Videoton: match statistics
Karcag SE vs Videoton: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Karcag SE played against Videoton in NB II (Hungary). The game was played on August 30, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Karcag SE has 1 win, 4 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Videoton has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Karcag SE scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 1.40. Videoton scores 1.60 and allows 1.40. Games in this league average 2.88 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 80% of Karcag SE's games and 60% of Videoton's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 80%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Videoton has the higher season xG average, 1.46 to 1.34 per game. Karcag SE takes 8.6 shots per game, while Videoton takes 11.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Karcag SE leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 1.20 goals per game after halftime. Videoton leads at halftime in 20% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Karcag SE's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). For Videoton, it is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NB II games average 2.88 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Karcag SE remain unbeaten after five league matches, with a record of 1 win and 4 draws, while Videoton have lost 3 of their 5 games. The hosts’ advantage is particularly evident at home: they have drawn both of their two matches so far, but averaged 2.5 goals with a 24% shot conversion rate. Videoton lost both away games, averaging just 1 goal and recording a -3 goal difference on the road. Both defenses concede 2.5 goals per game in their respective home and away fixtures, and neither side has kept a clean sheet. The visitors should therefore have chances to score, but Videoton’s superior chance creation is not reflected in the numbers: their away xG stands at 1.04 compared with Karcag’s 1.31. A narrow home win is therefore the most likely outcome, although Karcag’s high number of draws clearly increases the risk of the points being shared.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The case for both teams to score is strengthened by their current form: BTTS occurred in 80% of Karcag SE’s and 60% of Videoton’s last 5 matches. Karcag averaged 2.0 goals scored during this period but also conceded 1.4, while Videoton scored 1.6 goals and conceded 1.4. The hosts create more chances, averaging 14.0 shots and recording a season xG of 1.74, while Videoton, despite a lower average of 1.0 goal per match, has posted an xG of 1.35 across their last five appearances. An important argument against confidence in the pick is Karcag SE’s 67% clean-sheet rate this season and the fact that only 33% of their matches featured BTTS. However, Videoton’s 0% clean-sheet rate and 2.5 goals conceded away from home clearly increase the likelihood of the hosts scoring. With the league BTTS average standing at 59%, the more likely scenario remains one in which both teams score at least one goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Karcag SE average 2.00 goals at home, while Videoton concede as many as 2.50 goals per away match, clearly strengthening the case for at least two goals. The hosts also create more chances: their average xG stands at 1.74 from 14.0 shots and 5.67 shots on target, compared with just 6.5 shots for Videoton. In the teams’ last five matches, games featuring at least three goals occurred in 60% and 80% of cases respectively, with each team averaging 1.6–2.0 goals. In addition, Videoton have failed to keep a clean sheet in every match, while both teams surpassed the 1.5-goal line in 67% and 100% of their matches this season. The strongest selection is Over 1.5, as even with a cautious projection of 2.80 goals, the two-goal line has significantly higher coverage than the higher thresholds.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Karcag SE win after 90 minutes, as the hosts were level at the break in 67% of their matches, while the proportion of half-time draws in the teams’ last five matches was as high as 80%. Videoton also failed to lead at half-time in any of the analyzed away matches, with 100% ending level after the first half. After the interval, Karcag’s advantage should increase: the hosts score an average of 1.33 goals and concede just 0.33 in the second half, whereas Videoton concede as many as 2.0 goals after the break away from home. Across the full match, Karcag average 2.0 goals scored and 0.67 conceded, while Videoton have lost all of their away matches and allow opponents to score an average of 2.5 goals. The hosts’ higher xG, 1.74 versus 1.04, along with 14.0 shots per match compared with the visitors’ 6.5, further support the X/1 outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Karcag SE | Videoton | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 45% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.83 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Karcag SE is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Karcag SE · 1.2 pts / game - Videoton
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Karcag SE is 25% better for: goals scored per game.
2 goals / game - Karcag SE · 1.6 goals / game - Videoton
Karcag SE scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 games), while Videoton keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 games).
Videoton scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 games), while Karcag SE keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Karcag SE
Over / Under - Videoton
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Karcag SE - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Videoton - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Karcag SE
Videoton
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).
Teams vs league
| Karcag SE | Liga | Videoton | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.40 | 2.88 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 80% | 59% | • 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 56% | ▲ 80% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 23% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 71% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 60% | 83% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Karcag SE's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Videoton. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Karcag SE vs Videoton?
The NB II match finished Karcag SE 2:1 Videoton. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Karcag SE and Videoton?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Karcag SE won 1, Videoton won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Karcag SE vs Videoton?
Karcag SE score 2.00 goals per game on average and Videoton 1.60. The NB II average is 2.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Karcag SE's matches and 60% of Videoton's.
What form are Karcag SE and Videoton in?
Over the last 5 games Karcag SE have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Videoton 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Karcag SE vs Videoton?
The statistical background for Karcag SE vs Videoton — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


