Karmiotissa vs APEA: match statistics
Karmiotissa vs APEA: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Karmiotissa played against APEA in Second Division (Cyprus). The game was played on December 20, 2025. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Karmiotissa has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. APEA has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Karmiotissa scores 1.91 goals per game and allows 1.09. APEA scores 1.17 and allows 1.67. Games in this league average 2.49 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 55% of Karmiotissa's games and 50% of APEA's. The Over 2.5 rates are 73% and 67%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Karmiotissa has the higher season xG average, 1.68 to 1.37 per game. Karmiotissa takes 10.7 shots per game, while APEA takes 8.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Karmiotissa leads at halftime in 64% of its games and scores 0.73 goals per game after halftime. APEA leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Karmiotissa's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). For APEA, it is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 2.49 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Karmiotissa | APEA | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 46% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Karmiotissa is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Karmiotissa · 1 pts / game - APEA
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Karmiotissa is 63% better for: goals scored per game.
1.91 goals / game - Karmiotissa · 1.17 goals / game - APEA
Karmiotissa is 53% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.09 goals / game - Karmiotissa · 1.67 goals / game - APEA
Karmiotissa scores in 82% of games (9 of 11 meczów), while APEA keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 meczów).
APEA scores in 67% of games (8 of 12 meczów), while Karmiotissa keeps a clean sheet in 45% (5 of 11 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Karmiotissa
Over / Under - APEA
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Karmiotissa is 118% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.18 pts / game - Karmiotissa · 1 pts / game - APEA
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Karmiotissa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 64% of games and wins 55%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
APEA - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +6 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Karmiotissa
APEA
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Karmiotissa | Liga | APEA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.00 | 2.49 | ▲ 2.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 55% | 49% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 73% | 44% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 45% | 30% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 67% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 77% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- APEAGoalMichalis Christodoulou
FAQ
What was the result of Karmiotissa vs APEA?
The Second Division match finished Karmiotissa 1:2 APEA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Karmiotissa vs APEA?
Karmiotissa score 1.91 goals per game on average and APEA 1.17. The Second Division average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Karmiotissa's matches and 50% of APEA's.
What form are Karmiotissa and APEA in?
Over the last 5 games Karmiotissa have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and APEA 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Karmiotissa vs APEA?
The statistical background for Karmiotissa vs APEA — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.