Karmiotissa vs APEA: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Karmiotissa play APEA in Second Division (Cyprus). The match date is 20 December 2025 at 13:30. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Karmiotissa: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. APEA: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Karmiotissa scores 1.93 and concedes 0.89 goals per match. APEA scores 1.31 and concedes 1.31. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Karmiotissa 50%, APEA 48%. Over 2.5: Karmiotissa 57%, APEA 52%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Karmiotissa has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.31. Karmiotissa: 7.5 shots per match, APEA: 7.3.

Match halves

Karmiotissa: half-time lead 54%, second-half goals 1.00. APEA: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.76.

Goals by minute

Karmiotissa: 0-15 (12 goals). APEA: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
KarmiotissaAPEA
16Shots13
KarmiotissaAPEA
7Shots on target8
KarmiotissaAPEA
1.98xG1.67
KarmiotissaAPEA
4Corners2
KarmiotissaAPEA
67Dangerous attacks40
KarmiotissaAPEA
15Fouls17
KarmiotissaAPEA
0Cards0
KarmiotissaAPEA

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.93Goals scored / match1.31
KarmiotissaAPEA
0.89Goals conceded / match1.31
KarmiotissaAPEA
35%Average possession37%
KarmiotissaAPEA
3.07Shots on target / match3.21
KarmiotissaAPEA

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.5Shots per match7.31
KarmiotissaAPEA
3.07Shots on target3.21
KarmiotissaAPEA
25.7%Shot conversion17.9%
KarmiotissaAPEA
35%Possession37%
KarmiotissaAPEA
1.48xG for1.31
KarmiotissaAPEA
1.32xG against1.17
KarmiotissaAPEA

Shooting quality

Karmiotissa: Counter-attackingAPEA: Counter-attacking
KarmiotissaAPEA
Accuracy (shots on target)41%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.200.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.630.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Karmiotissa is 30% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Karmiotissa · 2 pts / match - APEA

Karmiotissa
WWWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
57% W29% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-8-4
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +29
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
11-2-1
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 0.69Opponent xG: 0.66BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
APEA
DLWWW
Season result split
38% W21% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-6-12
1.34 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-5
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WDDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.03Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Karmiotissa is 47% better for: goals scored per match.

1.93 goals / match - Karmiotissa · 1.31 goals / match - APEA

Karmiotissa is 47% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.89 goals / match - Karmiotissa · 1.31 goals / match - APEA

Karmiotissa scoring profile: very strong

Karmiotissa scores in 86% of matches (24 of 28 matches), while APEA keeps a clean sheet in 28% (8 of 29 matches).

APEA scoring profile: strong

APEA scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while Karmiotissa keeps a clean sheet in 46% (13 of 28 matches).

54Goals scored (season)38
KarmiotissaAPEA
25Goals conceded (season)38
KarmiotissaAPEA
2.82Average goals in match2.62
KarmiotissaAPEA
11Goals scored (last 5)10
KarmiotissaAPEA
2Goals conceded (last 5)5
KarmiotissaAPEA

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal72%
KarmiotissaAPEA
61%2 goals38%
KarmiotissaAPEA
29%3 goals17%
KarmiotissaAPEA
7%4 goals3%
KarmiotissaAPEA

How often they concede at least...

54%1 goal72%
KarmiotissaAPEA
29%2 goals34%
KarmiotissaAPEA
7%3 goals21%
KarmiotissaAPEA
0%4 goals3%
KarmiotissaAPEA

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time24%
KarmiotissaAPEA
4%BTTS in both halves7%
KarmiotissaAPEA
43%Scored in both halves24%
KarmiotissaAPEA

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS34%
KarmiotissaAPEA
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
KarmiotissaAPEA
20%BTTS - last 560%
KarmiotissaAPEA

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
KarmiotissaAPEA
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
KarmiotissaAPEA
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KarmiotissaAPEA

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
KarmiotissaAPEA
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
KarmiotissaAPEA
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
KarmiotissaAPEA

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Karmiotissa is 62% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.96 pts / match - Karmiotissa · 1.21 pts / match - APEA

Karmiotissa - half-time state
54% leading36% draw11% trailing
APEA - half-time state
28% leading38% draw34% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.96Points per match (1st half)1.21
KarmiotissaAPEA
0.93Goals scored (1st half)0.55
KarmiotissaAPEA
0.21Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
KarmiotissaAPEA
1.14Average goals (1st half)1.24
KarmiotissaAPEA
82%Clean sheet before half-time41%
KarmiotissaAPEA
39%No goal before half-time48%
KarmiotissaAPEA

After half-time (2nd half)

1.61Points per match (2nd half)1.38
KarmiotissaAPEA
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.76
KarmiotissaAPEA
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.62
KarmiotissaAPEA
1.68Average goals (2nd half)1.38
KarmiotissaAPEA
54%Clean sheet after half-time59%
KarmiotissaAPEA
32%No goal after half-time55%
KarmiotissaAPEA

Karmiotissa - second-half results

39% W43% R18% P
55
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+20
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.96
PPG before half-time
Lead holding106%

Leads at half-time in 54% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

APEA - second-half results

34% W34% R31% P
35
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Karmiotissa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.20
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+5+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
APEA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.60
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Karmiotissa
ScoredConceded
12
2
0-15
4
0
16-30
10
4
31-45
6
8
46-60
10
8
61-75
12
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

APEA
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
5
11
16-30
5
7
31-45
8
6
46-60
5
5
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.72
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Karmiotissa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.88
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
139%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

APEA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.66
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

KarmiotissaLigaAPEA
Average goals in match 2.822.72 2.62
Both teams scored 50%49% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%49% 52%
Clean sheets 46%30% 28%
Goal before half-time 68%72% 86%
Goal after half-time 82%77% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Karmiotissa vs APEA?

The Second Division match finished Karmiotissa 1:2 APEA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Karmiotissa vs APEA?

Karmiotissa score 1.93 goals per game on average and APEA 1.31. The Second Division average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Karmiotissa's matches and 48% of APEA's.

What form are Karmiotissa and APEA in?

Over the last 5 games Karmiotissa have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and APEA 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Karmiotissa vs APEA?

The statistical background for Karmiotissa vs APEA — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.