Kasımpaşa vs Amed: match statistics
Kasımpaşa vs Amed: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Kasımpaşa played against Amed in Süper Lig (Türkiye). The game was played on September 6, 2026. Venue: Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Stadyumu. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Kasımpaşa has 1 win, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.67 points per game. Amed has 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Kasımpaşa scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 0.67. Amed scores 1.67 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.83 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Kasımpaşa's games and 33% of Amed's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 67%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Amed has the higher season xG average, 1.41 to 0.93 per game. Kasımpaşa takes 9.0 shots per game, while Amed takes 14.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Kasımpaşa leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. Amed leads at halftime in 0% and scores 1.33 after halftime.
When the teams score
Kasımpaşa's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Amed, it is minutes 61-75 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Süper Lig games average 2.83 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kasımpaşa remain unbeaten in their last 5 matches, recording 2 wins and 3 draws, while Amed have lost 1 match over the same period. However, the home-field context is crucial: although the hosts drew their only home match so far, they scored 1 goal, whereas Amed lost their only away fixture 0:2 and failed to score. The visitors have enjoyed greater possession away from home, 56% compared with 40%, but their 12 shots per match have produced just 1 shot on target and a 0% conversion rate. Kasımpaşa create slightly better-quality chances at home, with an average xG of 1.09 compared with Amed’s 1.08, while their opponents concede an average of 2 goals away from home. The hosts’ defense does allow opponents an xG of 1.66, meaning a draw remains a realistic scenario, but Amed’s poor away finishing supports a Kasımpaşa win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal for BTTS - No comes from the season data: Amed have yet to score away from home, failing to find the net in 100% of those matches. Kasımpaşa concede just 0.5 goals per home game and keep a clean sheet in 50% of their matches, while their opponents’ average xG stands at 0.93. The hosts should also create chances, as they score 2.5 goals per home game, register 6 shots on target, and face a team conceding 2.0 goals. The last five matches for both sides produced goals from both teams in 60% of games, while Amed have averaged 1.8 goals and an xG of 1.60 during this period, reducing confidence in the pick. Despite this improvement in recent form, the combination of Amed’s very poor season scoring record and Kasımpaşa’s solid defense points more strongly towards a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Kasımpaşa have a clear home advantage: they average 2.5 goals scored and only 0.5 conceded at home, while Amed have failed to score away and concede an average of 2.0 goals. However, their broader form over the last five matches is more subdued, with the hosts scoring 1.0 goal and conceding 0.6 per game, while none of their matches went over the 2.5-goal line. Over the same period, Amed averaged 1.8 goals per match, but their games went over 2.5 goals in 60% of cases, increasing the scoring potential without suggesting regular four-goal results. The projected total of 2.45 goals remains below the 3.5 line, and both teams have seen 100% of their season matches finish with a maximum of three goals. The strongest selection is therefore Under 3.5 goals, as the home advantage could produce a controlled victory without requiring an open, high-scoring game.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Kasımpaşa win, as the hosts have scored just 0.4 goals before the break in their last five matches, compared with 0.6 for Amed. Kasımpaşa nevertheless have a clear quality advantage: their average xG is 1.58 versus Amed’s 1.08, while the hosts record an average of 6 shots on target per match compared with just 1 for their opponents. At home, Kasımpaşa score an average of 2.5 goals and concede only 0.5, whereas Amed average no goals scored away from home and allow opponents to score 2.0. A cautious start is suggested by the fact that Amed were level at half-time in 80% of their last five matches, but after the break the hosts have a favorable profile, conceding just 0.2 goals on average. Amed’s form means a surprise result cannot be ruled out entirely, as they have scored 1.8 goals per match over their last five games, but the hosts’ advantage should become most evident in the second half.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Kasımpaşa | Amed | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Amed is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1.67 pts / game - Kasımpaşa · 2 pts / game - Amed
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Amed is 67% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Kasımpaşa · 1.67 goals / game - Amed
Kasımpaşa is 49% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.67 goals / game - Kasımpaşa · 1 goals / game - Amed
Kasımpaşa scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 games), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 games).
Amed scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 games), while Kasımpaşa keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kasımpaşa
Over / Under - Amed
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kasımpaşa is 49% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Kasımpaşa · 0.67 pts / game - Amed
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kasımpaşa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Amed - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.33 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.3 | 0.7 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.7 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.7 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 100% |
| No goal | 67% | 33% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.67 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.3 | 1.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.7 | 0.3 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.7 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 67% |
| No goal | 67% | 33% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Kasımpaşa
Amed
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Süper Lig).
Teams vs league
| Kasımpaşa | Liga | Amed | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.67 | 2.83 | ▼ 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 57% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 0% | 50% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 22% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 77% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 90% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Kasımpaşa vs Amed?
The Süper Lig match finished Kasımpaşa 2:2 Amed. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kasımpaşa vs Amed?
Kasımpaşa score 1.00 goals per game on average and Amed 1.67. The Süper Lig average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Kasımpaşa's matches and 33% of Amed's.
What form are Kasımpaşa and Amed in?
Over the last 5 games Kasımpaşa have a 1-2-0 record (1.67 points per game) and Amed 2-0-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kasımpaşa vs Amed?
The statistical background for Kasımpaşa vs Amed — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


