Kataller Toyama vs Imabari: match statistics
Kataller Toyama vs Imabari: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Kataller Toyama played against Imabari in J2 League (Japan). The game was played on August 22, 2026. Venue: Toyama Athletic Recreation Park Stadium. Final score: 4:0.
Recent form
Kataller Toyama has 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.50 points per game. Imabari has 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 0.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Kataller Toyama scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 1.00. Imabari scores 1.50 and allows 2.50. Games in this league average 2.43 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 0% of Kataller Toyama's games and 100% of Imabari's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 100%, compared with league averages of 35% for BTTS and 39% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kataller Toyama has the higher season xG average, 2.54 to 1.63 per game. Kataller Toyama takes 21.5 shots per game, while Imabari takes 15.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Kataller Toyama leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Imabari leads at halftime in 0% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Kataller Toyama's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). For Imabari, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
J2 League games average 2.43 goals. Both teams score in 35% of games, and 39% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kataller Toyama sit 7th, while Imabari are 20th and started the season with two defeats. The hosts have won 2 of their last 5 matches, scoring 7 goals in that period, whereas the visitors are winless during the same span, recording 2 draws and 3 defeats. Imabari have conceded an average of 2 goals away from home, have kept no clean sheets on the road, and their average xG conceded is a high 1.67. The visitors can maintain possession for an average of 60% of the match and create chances worth 1.38 xG, so they may find the net; however, the 9 goals they have conceded in their last five matches significantly reduce their chances of taking points. The table advantage, better recent form and Imabari’s defensive problems all point to a Kataller Toyama win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS signal is clear, as both teams have recorded this scenario in 100% of their current-season matches, and neither has kept a clean sheet yet. Kataller Toyama score an average of 2.0 goals but concede as many as 3.0, while Imabari score 1.0 goal and allow opponents 2.0. The hosts create plenty of chances, averaging 18 shots with an xG of 1.87, while the visitors have an xG of 1.38, giving them a solid basis to score despite their weaker results. In their last five matches, Imabari recorded BTTS in 100% of cases and conceded an average of 1.8 goals, while Toyama scored 1.4 and conceded 1.6 goals per match. The hosts’ recent run lowers confidence in the pick, as BTTS occurred in only 40% of their five matches; however, the defensive weaknesses of both sides and Toyama’s high attacking potential still provide stronger support for the “yes” option.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Kataller Toyama creates plenty of chances, averaging 18 shots and 4 on target, with an average xG of 1.87. Imabari have failed to keep a clean sheet, conceding an average of 2.0 goals per match and allowing opponents chances worth 1.67 xG. In their last five matches, the two teams scored an average of 1.4 and 1.2 goals per match respectively, while Imabari conceded as many as 1.8 goals. Both teams have exceeded the 1.5-goal mark in 100% of their appearances so far, which, combined with a projected total of 2.87 goals, gives a clear edge to Over 1.5. The Over 2.5 line also has positive indicators, although it is more sensitive to the away side’s lower conversion rate, with Imabari averaging 1.0 goal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Kataller Toyama win at full-time, as the hosts have collected 1.4 points per game across their last five matches, compared with Imabari’s mere 0.4. Before the break, Toyama average 0.6 goals scored and 1.0 conceded, while Imabari record 0.8 scored and 0.6 conceded, suggesting an evenly matched, cautious opening. After the interval, the hosts improve to 0.8 goals per game, whereas the visitors concede as many as 1.2 goals while scoring only 0.4 after half-time. Toyama also have the higher average xG, 1.87 compared with their opponents’ 1.38, take an average of 18 shots to Imabari’s 13, and register 4 shots on target compared with 3 for Imabari. However, both teams remain defensively vulnerable, having conceded 1.6 and 1.8 goals respectively in their last five matches; therefore, a turnaround after a draw at half-time is more likely than a controlled continuation of a goalless result.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Kataller Toyama | Imabari | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 23% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kataller Toyama is 33% better for: goals scored per game.
2 goals / game - Kataller Toyama · 1.5 goals / game - Imabari
Kataller Toyama is 150% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Kataller Toyama · 2.5 goals / game - Imabari
Kataller Toyama scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 meczów), while Imabari keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 meczów).
Imabari scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 meczów), while Kataller Toyama keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kataller Toyama
Over / Under - Imabari
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kataller Toyama is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - Kataller Toyama · 0.5 pts / game - Imabari
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kataller Toyama - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Imabari - second-half results
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.50 | 1.50 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Average goals per game | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 50% | 50% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.5 |
| Average goals per game | 1.5 | 2.5 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 50% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 0% |
| No goal | 50% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Kataller Toyama
Imabari
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J2 League).
Teams vs league
| Kataller Toyama | Liga | Imabari | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.00 | 2.43 | ▲ 4.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 35% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 39% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 37% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 78% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 78% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Kataller Toyama's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Imabari. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Kataller Toyama vs Imabari?
The J2 League match finished Kataller Toyama 4:0 Imabari. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Kataller Toyama and Imabari?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Kataller Toyama won 0, Imabari won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Kataller Toyama vs Imabari?
Kataller Toyama score 2.00 goals per game on average and Imabari 1.50. The J2 League average is 2.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Kataller Toyama's matches and 100% of Imabari's.
What form are Kataller Toyama and Imabari in?
Over the last 5 games Kataller Toyama have a 1-0-1 record (1.50 points per game) and Imabari 0-0-2 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kataller Toyama vs Imabari?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kataller Toyama vs Imabari: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


