Japan - J2 LeagueToyama Athletic Recreation Park StadiumData current as of October 14, 2026

Kataller Toyama vs Tegevajaro Miyazaki: match statistics

Kataller Toyama vs Tegevajaro Miyazaki: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Kataller Toyama played against Tegevajaro Miyazaki in J2 League (Japan). The game was played on October 11, 2026. Venue: Toyama Athletic Recreation Park Stadium. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Kataller Toyama has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. Tegevajaro Miyazaki has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Kataller Toyama scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 1.00. Tegevajaro Miyazaki scores 1.44 and allows 1.44. Games in this league average 2.63 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 33% of Kataller Toyama's games and 56% of Tegevajaro Miyazaki's. The Over 2.5 rates are 56% and 44%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Kataller Toyama has the higher season xG average, 2.31 to 1.41 per game. Kataller Toyama takes 20.7 shots per game, while Tegevajaro Miyazaki takes 11.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Kataller Toyama leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 1.33 goals per game after halftime. Tegevajaro Miyazaki leads at halftime in 44% and scores 0.56 after halftime.

When the teams score

Kataller Toyama's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). For Tegevajaro Miyazaki, it is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

J2 League games average 2.63 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kataller Toyama sit 4th with a goal difference of 18:9, while 11th-placed Tegevajaro Miyazaki have scored and conceded 13 goals. At home, the hosts average 2.25 goals and create chances worth 2.62 xG, clearly outperforming the visitors away from home, where they average 1.5 goals and 1.27 xG. Kataller’s edge in chance creation is also reflected in an average of 9.5 shots on target in home matches, compared with Miyazaki’s 3 away from home. However, the visitors have won 3 of their last 5 matches, while the hosts have won only 2, so their current form should not be underestimated. The main argument for backing Kataller is the quality of their chances, although their average of 1.5 goals conceded at home and a 50% home draw rate temper confidence in the prediction.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes landed in 60% of Kataller Toyama’s matches and 50% of Tegevajaro Miyazaki’s, while both teams recorded a 60% rate across their last 5 matches. The hosts score an average of 1.4 goals, and the visitors concede 1.75, giving Kataller a clear chance to score. Tegevajaro average 1.5 goals scored, while Kataller concede 1.2; moreover, both teams conceded an average of 1.4 goals per match in their last 5 fixtures. Recent attacking form also supports the BTTS - Yes pick: the hosts averaged 1.8 goals scored and the visitors 2.0, although the fact that Kataller failed to score in 40% of their matches limits confidence in the prediction.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals: this line has been reached in 100% of the away team’s matches and 60% of the home team’s matches. Across their last five games, Kataller Toyama averaged 3.2 total goals, while Tegevajaro Miyazaki averaged 3.4, so current form also points to at least two goals. The home side creates chances worth an average of 1.52 xG, while the visitors concede an average of 1.75 goals, boosting Kataller’s chances of scoring. Tegevajaro score an average of 1.5 goals, while the hosts concede 1.2, making a forecast of 2.90 total goals a reasonable one. The Over 2.5 line has less statistical backing, having landed in 40% of the home team’s matches and 50% of the away team’s matches this season.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Tegevajaro Miyazaki led at the break in 4 of its last 5 matches and did not concede a first-half goal in any of them; over the same period, Kataller Toyama never went into half-time ahead. The visitors have also won 3 of their last 5 matches, compared with just 2 for the hosts, making Miyazaki leading at half-time and holding on to win the most likely single scenario. However, 2/2 is not a clear favorite: Toyama have averaged 1.6 goals after the break recently, while Miyazaki have conceded 1.4 goals in second halves. This increases the chances of a draw or a turnaround after the visitors take the lead, reflected in the relatively high probabilities of the 2/X and 2/1 scenarios.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

50Possession (%)50
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
15Shots16
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
7Shots on target6
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
1.92xG1.85
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
4Corners5
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
68Dangerous attacks59
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
9Fouls11
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
0Cards2
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
2Goals scored / game1.44
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
1Goals allowed / game1.44
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
58%Average possession49%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
7.33Shots on target / game3.78
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

20.67Shots per game11.56
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
7.33Shots on target3.78
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
9.7%Shot conversion12.5%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
58%Possession49%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
2.31xG for1.41
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
1.2xG against1.48
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki

Shooting quality

Kataller Toyama: DominantTegevajaro Miyazaki: Balanced
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
Accuracy (shots on target)35%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Kataller Toyama is 10% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / game - Kataller Toyama · 2 pts / game - Tegevajaro Miyazaki

Kataller Toyama
WDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
56% W22% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-2
1.89 pts / game · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-1
Last 5 at home
1-2-1
WLDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.19Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Tegevajaro Miyazaki
LWWWD
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-3
1.33 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-2
Last 5 away
1-1-2
DLLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kataller Toyama is 39% better for: goals scored per game.

2 goals / game - Kataller Toyama · 1.44 goals / game - Tegevajaro Miyazaki

Kataller Toyama is 44% better for: goals allowed per game.

1 goals / game - Kataller Toyama · 1.44 goals / game - Tegevajaro Miyazaki

Kataller Toyama scoring profile: very strong

Kataller Toyama scores in 78% of games (7 of 9 games), while Tegevajaro Miyazaki keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 games).

Tegevajaro Miyazaki scoring profile: mixed

Tegevajaro Miyazaki scores in 67% of games (6 of 9 games), while Kataller Toyama keeps a clean sheet in 56% (5 of 9 games).

18Goals scored (season)13
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
9Goals conceded (season)13
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
3Average goals per game2.89
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
8Goals scored (last 5)10
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
4Goals conceded (last 5)7
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal67%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
67%2 goals44%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
33%3 goals33%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
22%4 goals0%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki

How often they concede at least...

44%1 goal78%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
33%2 goals44%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
22%3 goals11%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
0%4 goals11%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time22%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
0%BTTS in both halves11%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
44%Scored in both halves44%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
22%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
40%BTTS - last 560%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tegevajaro Miyazaki is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / game - Kataller Toyama · 1.78 pts / game - Tegevajaro Miyazaki

Kataller Toyama - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing
Tegevajaro Miyazaki - half-time state
44% leading44% draw11% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per game (1st half)1.78
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.89
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
0.78Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
1.44Average goals (1st half)1.33
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
67%Clean sheet before half-time78%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
44%No goal before half-time33%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki

After half-time (2nd half)

2.22Points per game (2nd half)0.67
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
1.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.56
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
0.22Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
1.56Average goals (2nd half)1.56
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
78%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki
33%No goal after half-time56%
Kataller ToyamaTegevajaro Miyazaki

Kataller Toyama - second-half results

67% W22% D11% L
12
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding170%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 56%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.6

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Tegevajaro Miyazaki - second-half results

11% W33% D56% L
16
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.78
PPG before half-time
Lead holding75%

Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 33%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Kataller Toyama - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.202.20
Goals scored / game0.41.2
Goals allowed / game0.60.2
Average goals per game1.01.4
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Tegevajaro Miyazaki - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.600.60
Goals scored / game1.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.01.4
Average goals per game1.22.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet100%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+6-3
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Kataller Toyama
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
4
3
16-30
2
3
31-45
5
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
5
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Tegevajaro Miyazaki
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
1
3
16-30
3
0
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
1
61-75
2
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.94
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Kataller Toyama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
137%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Tegevajaro Miyazaki

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.67
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 31% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J2 League).

Teams vs league

Kataller ToyamaLigaTegevajaro Miyazaki
Average goals per game▲ 3.002.63▲ 2.89
Both teams scored▼ 33%53%▲ 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 56%51%▼ 44%
Clean sheets▲ 56%27%▼ 22%
Goal before half-time▼ 67%69%▼ 67%
Goal after half-time• 78%78%• 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.63
Average goals per game
53%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / game
1.16
Away goals / game
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defensive advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Kataller ToyamaGoalTsubasa YoshihiraAssist: Yoshiki Takahashi
  2. Tegevajaro MiyazakiSubstitutionOn: Takashi AbeOff: Hikaru Manabe
  3. Tegevajaro MiyazakiYellow cardMahiro Ano
  4. Tegevajaro MiyazakiGoalKoji Okumura
  5. Kataller ToyamaSubstitutionOn: Kiyoshiro TsuboiOff: Manato Furukawa
  6. Tegevajaro MiyazakiSubstitutionOn: Yudai TanakaOff: Kaiga Murakoshi
  7. Tegevajaro MiyazakiYellow cardKoji Okumura

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Kataller Toyama's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Tegevajaro Miyazaki. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Kataller Toyama vs Tegevajaro Miyazaki?

The J2 League match finished Kataller Toyama 1:1 Tegevajaro Miyazaki. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kataller Toyama vs Tegevajaro Miyazaki?

Kataller Toyama score 2.00 goals per game on average and Tegevajaro Miyazaki 1.44. The J2 League average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Kataller Toyama's matches and 56% of Tegevajaro Miyazaki's.

What form are Kataller Toyama and Tegevajaro Miyazaki in?

Over the last 5 games Kataller Toyama have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Tegevajaro Miyazaki 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kataller Toyama vs Tegevajaro Miyazaki?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kataller Toyama vs Tegevajaro Miyazaki: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.