Lithuania - A LygaData current as of September 06, 2026

Kauno Žalgiris vs Panevėžys: match statistics

Kauno Žalgiris crest
Kauno Žalgiris
4 : 0half-time 3:0
Panevėžys crest
Panevėžys
170%(0.00)
X20%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

Kauno Žalgiris displays impressive form as the table leader with three wins in three home matches and a 100% win rate at their own stadium. The hosts are yet to concede a goal at home, confirming their defensive solidity and achieving 100% clean sheets in home fixtures. Panevėžys, on the other hand, has not won a single away match this season, losing all fixtures on the road with an average of four goals conceded per game. The difference in ball possession (60% for the hosts vs 41% for the visitors) and goal difference (+1 for Kauno Žalgiris vs -3 for Panevėžys) further underscore the home team's dominance. The form of both teams over the last five matches (2.6 PPG for the hosts vs 1.0 for the visitors) alongside Kauno Žalgiris's current winning streak point to a decisive victory for the hosts.

Kauno Žalgiris vs Panevėžys: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Kauno Žalgiris played against Panevėžys in A Lyga (Lithuania). The game was played on March 10, 2026. Final score: 4:0.

Recent form

Kauno Žalgiris has 3 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. Panevėžys has 0 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 0.67 points per game.

Scoring records

Kauno Žalgiris scores 1.67 goals per game and allows 0.67. Panevėžys scores 0.67 and allows 1.67. Games in this league average 2.60 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 67% of Kauno Žalgiris's games and 67% of Panevėžys's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 33%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Kauno Žalgiris has the higher season xG average, 1.61 to 1.31 per game. Kauno Žalgiris takes 14.3 shots per game, while Panevėžys takes 12.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Kauno Žalgiris leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Panevėžys leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Kauno Žalgiris's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). For Panevėžys, it is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

A Lyga games average 2.60 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kauno Žalgiris displays impressive form as the table leader with three wins in three home matches and a 100% win rate at their own stadium. The hosts are yet to concede a goal at home, confirming their defensive solidity and achieving 100% clean sheets in home fixtures. Panevėžys, on the other hand, has not won a single away match this season, losing all fixtures on the road with an average of four goals conceded per game. The difference in ball possession (60% for the hosts vs 41% for the visitors) and goal difference (+1 for Kauno Žalgiris vs -3 for Panevėžys) further underscore the home team's dominance. The form of both teams over the last five matches (2.6 PPG for the hosts vs 1.0 for the visitors) alongside Kauno Žalgiris's current winning streak point to a decisive victory for the hosts.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

3 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

57Possession (%)43
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
19Shots4
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
12Shots on target2
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
2.4xG0.54
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
9Corners3
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
50Dangerous attacks18
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
10Fouls13
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
0Cards2
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
1.67Goals scored / game0.67
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
0.67Goals allowed / game1.67
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
65%Average possession47%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
4.67Shots on target / game4.67
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.33Shots per game12
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
4.67Shots on target4.67
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
11.6%Shot conversion5.6%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
65%Possession47%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
1.61xG for1.31
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
1.16xG against1.83
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys

Shooting quality

Kauno Žalgiris: DominantPanevėžys: Balanced
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
Accuracy (shots on target)33%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.14

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Kauno Žalgiris is 348% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / game - Kauno Žalgiris · 0.67 pts / game - Panevėžys

Kauno Žalgiris
WWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-0
3.00 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.7Goals conceded: 0.7xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 67%
Panevėžys
DLD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W67% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-2-1
0.67 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-1
0.67 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.7Goals conceded: 1.7xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 33%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kauno Žalgiris is 149% better for: goals scored per game.

1.67 goals / game - Kauno Žalgiris · 0.67 goals / game - Panevėžys

Kauno Žalgiris is 149% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.67 goals / game - Kauno Žalgiris · 1.67 goals / game - Panevėžys

Kauno Žalgiris scoring profile: very strong

Kauno Žalgiris scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 meczów), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 meczów).

Panevėžys scoring profile: strong

Panevėžys scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 meczów), while Kauno Žalgiris keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 meczów).

5Goals scored (season)2
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
2Goals conceded (season)5
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
2.33Average goals per game2.33
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
5Goals scored (last 5)2
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
2Goals conceded (last 5)5
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal67%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
67%2 goals0%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
0%3 goals0%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
0%4 goals0%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal67%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
0%2 goals33%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
0%3 goals33%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
0%4 goals33%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

47%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time33%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
33%Scored in both halves0%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
67%BTTS - last 567%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Panevėžys is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / game - Kauno Žalgiris · 1.67 pts / game - Panevėžys

Kauno Žalgiris - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing
Panevėžys - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per game (1st half)1.67
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.67
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
1.33Average goals (1st half)1
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
33%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
33%No goal before half-time33%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys

After half-time (2nd half)

2.33Points per game (2nd half)0.33
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
1Goals scored (2nd half)0
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
0Goals conceded (2nd half)1.33
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
1Average goals (2nd half)1.33
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
100%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys
33%No goal after half-time100%
Kauno ŽalgirisPanevėžys

Kauno Žalgiris - second-half results

67% W33% R0% P
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding303%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 100%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.7

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Panevėžys - second-half results

0% W33% R67% P
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+1.0

Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Kauno Žalgiris - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.332.33
Goals scored / game0.71.0
Goals allowed / game0.70.0
Average goals per game1.31.0
1 goal100%67%
2 goals33%33%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet33%100%
No goal33%33%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 33% leading - 33% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 67% won - 33% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 2
Panevėžys - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.670.33
Goals scored / game0.70.0
Goals allowed / game0.31.3
Average goals per game1.01.3
1 goal67%67%
2 goals33%33%
3 goals0%33%
Clean sheet67%33%
No goal33%100%
Goal difference+1-4
Half-time: 33% leading - 67% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 33% draw - 67% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Kauno Žalgiris
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Panevėžys
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
2
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.34
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Kauno Žalgiris

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.49
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
60% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
60%

Panevėžys

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.64
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.7
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).

Teams vs league

Kauno ŽalgirisLigaPanevėžys
Average goals per game 2.332.60 2.33
Both teams scored 67%47% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%47% 33%
Clean sheets 33%33% 33%
Goal before half-time 100%80% 67%
Goal after half-time 67%73% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.60
Average goals per game
47%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / game
1.07
Away goals / game
+43%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defensive advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Kauno ŽalgirisGoalFabien Ourega
  2. Kauno ŽalgirisGoalLeonardo Ribeiro Da Cruz
  3. Kauno ŽalgirisGoalAmine Benchaib
  4. PanevėžysYellow cardIsaac Asante
  5. PanevėžysYellow cardRokas Rasimavičius
  6. Kauno ŽalgirisSubstitutionOn: Fedor ČernychOff: Leonardo Ribeiro Da Cruz
  7. Kauno ŽalgirisSubstitutionOn: Dāvis IkaunieksOff: Motiejus Burba
  8. PanevėžysSubstitutionOn: Edvin MuratovicOff: Marko Bačanin
  9. Kauno ŽalgirisGoalAmine Benchaib
  10. Kauno ŽalgirisSubstitutionOn: Luka RacicOff: Anton Tolordava

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Kauno Žalgiris's perspective: 3 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Panevėžys. Games average 2.75 goals, and both teams scored in 25% of them.

FK Kauno Žalgiris
3 : 2
FK Panevėžys
FK Panevėžys
1 : 0
FK Kauno Žalgiris
FK Kauno Žalgiris
3 : 0
FK Panevėžys
FK Panevėžys
0 : 2
FK Kauno Žalgiris

FAQ

What was the result of Kauno Žalgiris vs Panevėžys?

The A Lyga match finished Kauno Žalgiris 4:0 Panevėžys. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Kauno Žalgiris and Panevėžys?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Kauno Žalgiris won 3, Panevėžys won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Kauno Žalgiris vs Panevėžys?

Kauno Žalgiris score 1.67 goals per game on average and Panevėžys 0.67. The A Lyga average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Kauno Žalgiris's matches and 67% of Panevėžys's.

What form are Kauno Žalgiris and Panevėžys in?

Over the last 5 games Kauno Žalgiris have a 3-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Panevėžys 0-2-1 (0.67 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kauno Žalgiris vs Panevėžys?

The statistical background for Kauno Žalgiris vs Panevėžys — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.