Kavala vs PAOK II: match statistics
Kavala vs PAOK II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Kavala played against PAOK II in Super League 2 (Greece). The game was played on April 5, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Kavala has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. PAOK II has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Kavala scores 0.87 goals per game and allows 1.22. PAOK II scores 1.52 and allows 1.09. Games in this league average 2.20 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 30% of Kavala's games and 43% of PAOK II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 35% and 48%, compared with league averages of 38% for BTTS and 37% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
PAOK II has the higher season xG average, 1.05 to 0.98 per game. Kavala takes 6.0 shots per game, while PAOK II takes 6.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Kavala leads at halftime in 13% of its games and scores 0.65 goals per game after halftime. PAOK II leads at halftime in 35% and scores 0.87 after halftime.
When the teams score
Kavala's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For PAOK II, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Super League 2 games average 2.20 goals. Both teams score in 38% of games, and 37% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
PAOK II appear to be the favorites based on form and goal output: the visitors have scored 35 goals this season versus Kavala’s 20 and have scored 10 goals in their last 5 matches while conceding only 2, whereas Kavala have 4 scored and 6 conceded in the same period. The disparity in form is confirmed by results — PAOK have averaged 2.4 points per match in their last 5 and won 4 times, while Kavala average 1.0 point per match with just 1 win. Hosts do, however, possess a defensive edge at home: Kavala concede an average of 0.91 goals at their stadium and record clean sheets in 45% of matches, whereas PAOK as visitors concede 1.00 on average and have 25% clean sheets. In attack PAOK are slightly more efficient — averaging 2.91 shots on target per match and a 21% conversion rate versus 2.67 shots on target and 19% for the hosts, and xG for is similar (1.05 for PAOK vs 1.10 for Kavala), suggesting greater finishing efficiency from the visitors given comparable quality of chances. Considering the clearer form and superior recent goal differential, I predict an away win; proposed probability split: 25% home, 30% draw, 45% away.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal and form data point to a 'No' scenario: Kavala has BTTS in 27% of home games, PAOK II shows a season BTTS rate of 58%, but in the last 5 meetings both teams produced BTTS in only 20% of cases. Kavala keeps a clean sheet in 45% of home matches, and in the league the clean-sheet rate is as high as 70%, which substantially reduces the likelihood of both teams scoring. The last 5 matches show an asymmetry: PAOK II averaged 2.0 goals scored and 0.4 conceded (10 scored, 2 conceded), while Kavala averaged 0.8 scored and 1.2 conceded (4:6), suggesting the visitors score more but also rarely concede. Seasonal xG for both teams is 1.05, and seasonal average goals are 1.73 for Kavala versus 1.33 for PAOK II with average goals conceded of 1.18 and 1.00 respectively; combined with the low BTTS rate for the home side (27%) and the high clean-sheet percentages (45%/70%), I lean to 'BTTS - No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I back Over 1.5 (72%) because seasonally 73% of Kavala’s matches and 67% of PAOK II’s matches finish over 1.5 goals, while the league average is 2.2 goals per game. The estimate yields roughly 2.30 total goals: Kavala ~1.35 and PAOK II ~0.95, based on both teams’ xG of 1.05+1.05 and adjustments from Kavala’s 24% conversion rate with an average of 7.18 shots. For the 2.5 line the picture is more balanced — Kavala has 55% of games over 2.5, PAOK II 42% (average 48.5%), and in the last 5 matches both teams have 60% of games over 2.5, hence a moderate 52% for Over 2.5. Over 3.5 is unlikely: only 27% of Kavala’s games and 17% of PAOK II’s exceed 3.5 goals, so I rate Over 3.5 at about 22%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Kavala has a clear seasonal advantage: average goals 1.73 versus 1.33 for PAOK II and led at the break in 5 matches (45%) compared to 3 matches (25%) for their opponents. Both teams have identical xG of 1.05, but Kavala registers more shots on target (3.27 vs 2.91) and enjoys a higher shot conversion rate (24% vs 21%), which increases the likelihood of turning chances into goals. After the break Kavala scores on average 1.09 goals versus 0.67 for PAOK II and have netted 7 goals in minutes 76–90 compared to 3 for the visitors, so they possess an advantage in late stages and a chance to see a lead at the break through to full-time. PAOK II are however in form (4 wins in their last 5, 80%), so a draw or a turnaround is possible; nonetheless, based on the above figures the strongest signal is Kavala leading at half-time and winning at full-time (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Kavala | PAOK II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.47 | 0.52 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
PAOK II is 140% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Kavala · 2.4 pts / game - PAOK II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
PAOK II is 75% better for: goals scored per game.
0.87 goals / game - Kavala · 1.52 goals / game - PAOK II
PAOK II is 12% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.22 goals / game - Kavala · 1.09 goals / game - PAOK II
Kavala scores in 61% of games (14 of 23 meczów), while PAOK II keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 meczów).
PAOK II scores in 74% of games (17 of 23 meczów), while Kavala keeps a clean sheet in 43% (10 of 23 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kavala
Over / Under - PAOK II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
PAOK II is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.87 pts / game - Kavala · 1.39 pts / game - PAOK II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kavala - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
PAOK II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Kavala
PAOK II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League 2).
Teams vs league
| Kavala | Liga | PAOK II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.09 | 2.20 | ▲ 2.61 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 30% | 38% | ▲ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 35% | 37% | ▲ 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 35% | • 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 52% | 64% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | • 74% | 73% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- KavalaGoalChristos Rovas
- KavalaGoalMark Sifneos
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Kavala's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss against PAOK II. Games average 2.67 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Kavala vs PAOK II?
The Super League 2 match finished Kavala 2:1 PAOK II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Kavala and PAOK II?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Kavala won 1, PAOK II won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Kavala vs PAOK II?
Kavala score 0.87 goals per game on average and PAOK II 1.52. The Super League 2 average is 2.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Kavala's matches and 43% of PAOK II's.
What form are Kavala and PAOK II in?
Over the last 5 games Kavala have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and PAOK II 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kavala vs PAOK II?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kavala vs PAOK II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


