Morocco - Botola ProStade de MarrakechData current as of September 06, 2026

Kawkab Marrakech vs FUS Rabat: match statistics

Kawkab Marrakech crest
Kawkab Marrakech
2 : 0half-time 2:0
FUS Rabat crest
FUS Rabat

Kawkab Marrakech vs FUS Rabat: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Kawkab Marrakech played against FUS Rabat in Botola Pro (Morocco). The game was played on June 25, 2026. Venue: Stade de Marrakech. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

Kawkab Marrakech has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. FUS Rabat has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Kawkab Marrakech scores 0.88 goals per game and allows 0.92. FUS Rabat scores 1.08 and allows 1.19. Games in this league average 2.13 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 46% of Kawkab Marrakech's games and 54% of FUS Rabat's. The Over 2.5 rates are 35% and 31%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

FUS Rabat has the higher season xG average, 1.39 to 1.34 per game. Kawkab Marrakech takes 11.2 shots per game, while FUS Rabat takes 10.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Kawkab Marrakech leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 0.42 goals per game after halftime. FUS Rabat leads at halftime in 31% and scores 0.54 after halftime.

When the teams score

Kawkab Marrakech's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For FUS Rabat, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Botola Pro games average 2.13 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The analytical favorite is Kawkab Marrakech, so I back the home win; they win 46% of home matches and have a positive home goal difference of +6, while FUS Rabat have a negative away goal difference (-2) and only 31% wins on the road. The home defense looks more solid — Kawkab concedes on average 0.85 goals per home match and keeps a clean sheet in 38% of games, whereas FUS concede 1.31 goals away and have only 23% clean sheets. Offensively the hosts create more quality chances: Kawkab’s average xG at home is 1.44 with 4 shots on target and 11.9 total shots, while FUS have an away xG of 1.25 with 3.31 shots on target, suggesting a home advantage in chance creation. Against Kawkab counts a weaker recent form over the last 5 matches — only 1 win and 0.8 points per game, while FUS average 1.2 points in that sample (1 win, 3 draws, 1 loss). Considering home effectiveness, the higher xG (1.44 vs 1.25) and better defensive metrics for the hosts, I assign 50% probability to a Kawkab win, 30% to a draw and 20% to a FUS victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Despite the home side's season BTTS rate of 62% (away 46%, league 50%), the hosts have had BTTS = 0% in their last 5 matches and have averaged only 0.4 goals per game, which is a strong argument against the "both teams to score" option. The visitors have a 40% BTTS in their last 5 and average 0.6 goals, while seasonally they score 1.15 and concede 1.31 goals per game, so their offense is moderate and not clearly dominant. xG analysis shows some potential (home season xG 1.52 vs opponents' xG against the visitors 1.37; away season xG 1.25 vs opponents' xG against the hosts 1.21), but in the last 5 matches the homes' xG was 1.41 with only 0.4 goals scored on average, and the visitors' xG was 1.63 with only 0.6 goals, indicating a significant finishing issue. Additionally, hosts average 4.23 shots on target vs 3.31 for visitors, but conversion rates are low (9% and 11%) and the league averages 2.13 goals per game, therefore I ultimately favor the "No" scenario (60%) over "Yes" (40%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams frequently play matches with at least 2 goals – Kawkab 77% and FUS 69% – which strongly signals Over 1.5. An xG-based model shows 1.52 xG for Kawkab versus 1.37 xG conceded by FUS (expected 1.45 goals for the home side) and 1.25 xG for FUS with 1.21 xG conceded by Kawkab (expected 1.23 goals for the away side), total xG = 2.68, above the league average of 2.13. The Poisson distribution for λ=2.68 yields roughly a 75% chance of at least 2 goals and about 50% for 3+ goals, therefore Over 1.5 is the safest option while Over 2.5 is balanced. Additionally, Kawkab averages 4.23 shots on target per match versus 3.31 for FUS, with conversion rates of 9.0% (Kawkab) and 11.0% (FUS); both teams also have a significant share of BTTS matches (Kawkab 62%, FUS 46%), reinforcing the expectation of at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I back a draw at Half-Time and a draw at Full-Time (X/X) because the home side draws in 46% of matches and are level at the break in 46% of games; in their last five outings the home team failed to score before half-time (0.0 average) while the visitors average 0.4 first-half goals. The hosts generate more chances (xG 1.52 vs 1.25 for the visitors and 4.23 shots on target vs 3.31) but lower finishing efficiency (9% vs 11%) limits goals, which favors low-scoring, drawn outcomes. After the break the visitors hold a moderate advantage (second-half ppg 1.23 vs 1.08 and second-half wins 31% vs 23%), so any decisive result would tend to favor the away side, but that does not eliminate a draw as the most common scenario. Consequently the clearest signal from the data is X/X (32%), with meaningful alternatives X/2 (18%) and 2/2 (13%) reflecting the visitors’ slight second-half edge.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

40Possession (%)60
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
8Shots12
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
3Shots on target3
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
1.01xG1.43
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
3Corners4
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
41Dangerous attacks63
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
13Fouls5
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
3Cards2
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
0.88Goals scored / game1.08
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
0.92Goals allowed / game1.19
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
43%Average possession50%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
3.46Shots on target / game3.77
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.23Shots per game10.65
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
3.46Shots on target3.77
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
7.9%Shot conversion10.1%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
43%Possession50%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
1.34xG for1.39
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
1.33xG against1.29
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat

Shooting quality

Kawkab Marrakech: BalancedFUS Rabat: Balanced
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
Accuracy (shots on target)31%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

FUS Rabat is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - Kawkab Marrakech · 1.2 pts / game - FUS Rabat

Kawkab Marrakech
DWLLL
Season result split
27% W35% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-9-10
1.15 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-4-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
FUS Rabat
DDDWL
Season result split
31% W35% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-9-9
1.27 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-6
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LWDDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FUS Rabat is 23% better for: goals scored per game.

0.88 goals / game - Kawkab Marrakech · 1.08 goals / game - FUS Rabat

Kawkab Marrakech is 29% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.92 goals / game - Kawkab Marrakech · 1.19 goals / game - FUS Rabat

Kawkab Marrakech scoring profile: strong

Kawkab Marrakech scores in 58% of games (15 of 26 meczów), while FUS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 23% (6 of 26 meczów).

FUS Rabat scoring profile: strong

FUS Rabat scores in 69% of games (18 of 26 meczów), while Kawkab Marrakech keeps a clean sheet in 31% (8 of 26 meczów).

23Goals scored (season)28
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
24Goals conceded (season)31
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
1.81Average goals per game2.27
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
2Goals scored (last 5)3
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal69%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
23%2 goals27%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
8%3 goals12%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
0%4 goals0%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal77%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
23%2 goals27%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
0%3 goals8%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
0%4 goals8%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

46%
Kawkab Marrakech - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 26 meczów
50%
League average

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time19%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
0%BTTS in both halves4%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
15%Scored in both halves27%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
0%BTTS - last 540%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
15%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kawkab Marrakech - half-time state
31% leading46% draw23% trailing
FUS Rabat - half-time state
31% leading42% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per game (1st half)1.35
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
0.46Goals scored (1st half)0.54
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
0.27Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
0.73Average goals (1st half)1.04
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
73%Clean sheet before half-time58%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
65%No goal before half-time54%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1.15
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.54
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
0.65Goals conceded (2nd half)0.69
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
1.08Average goals (2nd half)1.23
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
46%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat
62%No goal after half-time50%
Kawkab MarrakechFUS Rabat

Kawkab Marrakech - second-half results

15% W54% R31% P
36
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding87%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 27%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

FUS Rabat - second-half results

27% W35% R38% P
35
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Kawkab Marrakech - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.00
Goals scored / game0.00.4
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game0.41.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
FUS Rabat - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.60
Goals scored / game0.40.2
Goals allowed / game0.20.6
Average goals per game0.60.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Kawkab Marrakech
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
3
0
16-30
8
4
31-45
0
4
46-60
2
4
61-75
9
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

FUS Rabat
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
4
2
16-30
7
6
31-45
2
6
46-60
4
6
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.04
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Kawkab Marrakech

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
39% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
39%

FUS Rabat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

Kawkab MarrakechLigaFUS Rabat
Average goals per game 1.812.13 2.27
Both teams scored 46%50% 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 35%38% 31%
Clean sheets 31%31% 23%
Goal before half-time 58%61% 69%
Goal after half-time 69%73% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.13
Average goals per game
50%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.13
Home goals / game
1.00
Away goals / game
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defensive advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FUS RabatYellow cardAnas Serrhat
  2. Kawkab MarrakechGoalGnolou Claude
  3. Kawkab MarrakechYellow cardYoussef Raiani
  4. Kawkab MarrakechGoalSouleymane CisséAssist: Ismail Mihrab
  5. Kawkab MarrakechRed cardIsmail Mihrab
  6. FUS RabatYellow cardFernando Data Chamboco
  7. Kawkab MarrakechSubstitutionOn: Hamza El JanatiOff: Youssef Raiani
  8. Kawkab MarrakechSubstitutionOn: Oussama MahrousOff: Hamza Rafaa

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Kawkab Marrakech's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against FUS Rabat. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Kawkab Marrakech vs FUS Rabat?

The Botola Pro match finished Kawkab Marrakech 2:0 FUS Rabat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kawkab Marrakech vs FUS Rabat?

Kawkab Marrakech score 0.88 goals per game on average and FUS Rabat 1.08. The Botola Pro average is 2.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Kawkab Marrakech's matches and 54% of FUS Rabat's.

What form are Kawkab Marrakech and FUS Rabat in?

Over the last 5 games Kawkab Marrakech have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and FUS Rabat 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kawkab Marrakech vs FUS Rabat?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.