Kazma vs Al Nasar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kazma play Al Nasar in Kuwait Premier League (Kuwait). The match date is 20 December 2025 at 14:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Kazma: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Al Nasar: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kazma scores 1.22 and concedes 0.91 goals per match. Al Nasar scores 1.05 and concedes 1.27. League average: 2.54 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kazma 48%, Al Nasar 55%. Over 2.5: Kazma 35%, Al Nasar 41%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Kazma has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.36. Kazma: 12.1 shots per match, Al Nasar: 9.1.

Match halves

Kazma: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.70. Al Nasar: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.55.

Goals by minute

Kazma: 76-90+ (7 goals). Al Nasar: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kuwait Premier League: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
KazmaAl Nasar
15Shots6
KazmaAl Nasar
4Shots on target2
KazmaAl Nasar
2xG0.96
KazmaAl Nasar
6Corners4
KazmaAl Nasar
107Dangerous attacks59
KazmaAl Nasar
15Fouls9
KazmaAl Nasar
0Cards0
KazmaAl Nasar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.22Goals scored / match1.05
KazmaAl Nasar
0.91Goals conceded / match1.27
KazmaAl Nasar
53%Average possession49%
KazmaAl Nasar
3.65Shots on target / match4.14
KazmaAl Nasar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.09Shots per match9.05
KazmaAl Nasar
3.65Shots on target4.14
KazmaAl Nasar
10.1%Shot conversion11.6%
KazmaAl Nasar
53%Possession49%
KazmaAl Nasar
1.48xG for1.36
KazmaAl Nasar
1.03xG against1.39
KazmaAl Nasar

Shooting quality

Kazma: BalancedAl Nasar: Balanced
KazmaAl Nasar
Accuracy (shots on target)30%46%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kazma is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Kazma · 1 pts / match - Al Nasar

Kazma
LDWDW
Season result split
43% W35% R22% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-8-5
1.65 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Al Nasar
LLWDD
Season result split
23% W27% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-11
0.95 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-6
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.86Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kazma is 16% better for: goals scored per match.

1.22 goals / match - Kazma · 1.05 goals / match - Al Nasar

Kazma is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.91 goals / match - Kazma · 1.27 goals / match - Al Nasar

Kazma scoring profile: very strong

Kazma scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while Al Nasar keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 matches).

Al Nasar scoring profile: strong

Al Nasar scores in 64% of matches (14 of 22 matches), while Kazma keeps a clean sheet in 39% (9 of 23 matches).

28Goals scored (season)23
KazmaAl Nasar
21Goals conceded (season)28
KazmaAl Nasar
2.13Average goals in match2.32
KazmaAl Nasar
6Goals scored (last 5)7
KazmaAl Nasar
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
KazmaAl Nasar

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal64%
KazmaAl Nasar
35%2 goals23%
KazmaAl Nasar
9%3 goals14%
KazmaAl Nasar
4%4 goals5%
KazmaAl Nasar

How often they concede at least...

61%1 goal86%
KazmaAl Nasar
26%2 goals32%
KazmaAl Nasar
4%3 goals5%
KazmaAl Nasar
0%4 goals5%
KazmaAl Nasar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time27%
KazmaAl Nasar
0%BTTS in both halves0%
KazmaAl Nasar
17%Scored in both halves23%
KazmaAl Nasar

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS32%
KazmaAl Nasar
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
KazmaAl Nasar
40%BTTS - last 580%
KazmaAl Nasar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
KazmaAl Nasar
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
KazmaAl Nasar
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
KazmaAl Nasar

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
KazmaAl Nasar
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time23%
KazmaAl Nasar
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
KazmaAl Nasar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kazma is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.43 pts / match - Kazma · 1.09 pts / match - Al Nasar

Kazma - half-time state
35% leading39% draw26% trailing
Al Nasar - half-time state
23% leading41% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per match (1st half)1.09
KazmaAl Nasar
0.52Goals scored (1st half)0.5
KazmaAl Nasar
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.73
KazmaAl Nasar
0.87Average goals (1st half)1.23
KazmaAl Nasar
70%Clean sheet before half-time41%
KazmaAl Nasar
57%No goal before half-time55%
KazmaAl Nasar

After half-time (2nd half)

1.3Points per match (2nd half)1.41
KazmaAl Nasar
0.7Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
KazmaAl Nasar
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
KazmaAl Nasar
1.26Average goals (2nd half)1.09
KazmaAl Nasar
57%Clean sheet after half-time59%
KazmaAl Nasar
52%No goal after half-time59%
KazmaAl Nasar

Kazma - second-half results

26% W52% R22% P
33
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Nasar - second-half results

36% W32% R32% P
24
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kazma - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Al Nasar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.60
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match1.20.0
Average goals in match1.61.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%100%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-4+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kazma
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
4
3
16-30
6
5
31-45
5
2
46-60
4
4
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Al Nasar
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
4
6
16-30
5
8
31-45
2
3
46-60
2
3
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.23
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+35%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kazma

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Al Nasar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kuwait Premier League).

Teams vs league

KazmaLigaAl Nasar
Average goals in match 2.132.54 2.32
Both teams scored 48%47% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 35%44% 41%
Clean sheets 39%30% 14%
Goal before half-time 65%70% 77%
Goal after half-time 70%77% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.54
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.41
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Kazma 1 - 0 - 0 Al Nasar. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Kazma vs Al Nasar?

The Kuwait Premier League match finished Kazma 1:0 Al Nasar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kazma vs Al Nasar?

Kazma score 1.22 goals per game on average and Al Nasar 1.05. The Kuwait Premier League average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Kazma's matches and 55% of Al Nasar's.

What form are Kazma and Al Nasar in?

Over the last 5 games Kazma have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Al Nasar 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kazma vs Al Nasar?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kazma vs Al Nasar: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.