Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of September 20, 2026

KCCA vs Kataka: match statistics

KCCA crest
KCCA
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Kataka

KCCA vs Kataka: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

KCCA played against Kataka in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The game was played on September 16, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

KCCA has 0 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.33 points per game. Kataka has 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 0.50 points per game.

Scoring records

KCCA scores 0.00 goals per game and allows 1.33. Kataka scores 0.50 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 2.15 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 0% of KCCA's games and 50% of Kataka's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 50%, compared with league averages of 42% for BTTS and 42% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

KCCA has the higher season xG average, 1.68 to 1.05 per game. KCCA takes 10.3 shots per game, while Kataka takes 7.5.

First-half and second-half trends

KCCA leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.00 goals per game after halftime. Kataka leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

KCCA's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (0 goals). For Kataka, it is minutes 31-45+ (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Uganda Premier League games average 2.15 goals. Both teams score in 42% of games, and 42% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Both teams have started the season without a win: KCCA have a record of 0 wins, 1 draw and 2 defeats, while Kataka have 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 defeat. KCCA create significantly more chances at home, averaging 13 shots and an xG of 1.65, compared with Kataka’s 5 shots and xG of 0.77 away from home, yet the hosts are still without a goal in their home fixture. Kataka have also failed to score away, but kept a clean sheet and drew their only match there, whereas KCCA lost at home and conceded an average of 2 goals. In their last five matches, KCCA have collected 5 points and scored 4 goals, while Kataka have earned 3 points and scored just 2 goals. KCCA’s advantage in chance creation gives the hosts a chance to end their drought, but the low finishing efficiency of both sides and Kataka’s solid away defense point most strongly towards a draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - Yes pick is not strongly supported, primarily due to Kataka’s extremely limited attacking output: the visitors are averaging just 0.4 goals over their last 5 matches and only 1 shot on target per game. Kataka have failed to score in 100% of the available seasonal sample, while their average xG is only 0.77, although it has risen to 1.11 over their last five matches. KCCA have also been inefficient in front of goal, averaging 0.8 goals in their last five appearances; however, the visitors’ defense has conceded as many as 1.6 goals per match during this period, with an xG against of 2.11. BTTS has occurred in only 20% of KCCA’s last five matches and 40% of Kataka’s, compared with 39% across the league. The most likely scenario is therefore that KCCA exploit their opponents’ defensive weakness, while at least one team—particularly Kataka—fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The projected total of 2.10 goals is below the four-goal line, while the Ugandan league averages just 1.96 goals per match. In their last five games, KCCA averaged 0.8 goals scored and 1.0 conceded, while Kataka scored 0.4 goals and conceded 1.6. Only 20% of KCCA’s recent matches and 40% of Kataka’s games went Over 2.5 goals, compared with the league average of 35% for Over 2.5. KCCA have recently created chances worth 1.64 xG, but Kataka generate just 1.11 xG, limiting the prospect of an open, high-scoring game. The strongest pick is Under 3.5, as losing this line requires at least four goals, and the current attacking form of both teams clearly does not support that outcome.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time, as both teams were level after 45 minutes in 3 of their last 5 matches, representing 60% of cases. First halves are highly conservative: KCCA average 0.4 goals in them, Kataka 0.2, while the combined average is 0.6 and 0.8 goals, respectively. Kataka have not won any of their last five matches and drew as many as 60% of them, while KCCA have recorded just 20% wins and 40% draws. The hosts have the higher xG, 1.32 compared with 0.77, but their recent average of goals scored is only 0.8, while Kataka maintain a draw-oriented profile despite their weak attacking output of 0.4 goals per match. After the break, both teams also score very little, averaging 0.4 and 0.2 goals respectively in their last five outings, increasing the likelihood that the balanced scoreline will hold until the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

56Possession (%)44
KCCAKataka
16Shots10
KCCAKataka
5Shots on target4
KCCAKataka
2.1xG1.4
KCCAKataka
7Corners4
KCCAKataka
103Dangerous attacks68
KCCAKataka
6Fouls14
KCCAKataka
0Cards0
KCCAKataka

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0Goals scored / game0.5
KCCAKataka
1.33Goals allowed / game2
KCCAKataka
62%Average possession49%
KCCAKataka
4Shots on target / game2.5
KCCAKataka

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.33Shots per game7.5
KCCAKataka
4Shots on target2.5
KCCAKataka
0%Shot conversion6.7%
KCCAKataka
62%Possession49%
KCCAKataka
1.68xG for1.05
KCCAKataka
1.03xG against1.78
KCCAKataka

Shooting quality

KCCA: BalancedKataka: Balanced
KCCAKataka
Accuracy (shots on target)39%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.20

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Kataka is 52% better for: last-5 form.

0.33 pts / game - KCCA · 0.5 pts / game - Kataka

KCCA
LLD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W33% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.03BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Kataka
DL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W50% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.78BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KCCA is 50% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.33 goals / game - KCCA · 2 goals / game - Kataka

KCCA scoring profile: more difficult

KCCA scores in 0% of games (0 of 3 games), while Kataka keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 games).

Kataka scoring profile: mixed

Kataka scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 games), while KCCA keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 games).

0Goals scored (season)1
KCCAKataka
4Goals conceded (season)4
KCCAKataka
1.33Average goals per game2.5
KCCAKataka
0Goals scored (last 5)1
KCCAKataka
4Goals conceded (last 5)4
KCCAKataka

How often they score at least...

0%1 goal50%
KCCAKataka
0%2 goals0%
KCCAKataka
0%3 goals0%
KCCAKataka
0%4 goals0%
KCCAKataka

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal50%
KCCAKataka
67%2 goals50%
KCCAKataka
0%3 goals50%
KCCAKataka
0%4 goals50%
KCCAKataka

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time50%
KCCAKataka
0%BTTS in both halves0%
KCCAKataka
0%Scored in both halves0%
KCCAKataka

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
KCCAKataka
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
KCCAKataka
0%BTTS - last 550%
KCCAKataka

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

33%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
KCCAKataka
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
KCCAKataka
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time50%
KCCAKataka

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
KCCAKataka
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
KCCAKataka
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
KCCAKataka

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KCCA is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.67 pts / game - KCCA · 0.5 pts / game - Kataka

KCCA - half-time state
0% leading67% draw33% trailing
Kataka - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.67Points per game (1st half)0.5
KCCAKataka
0Goals scored (1st half)0.5
KCCAKataka
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)1
KCCAKataka
0.33Average goals (1st half)1.5
KCCAKataka
67%Clean sheet before half-time50%
KCCAKataka
100%No goal before half-time50%
KCCAKataka

After half-time (2nd half)

0.33Points per game (2nd half)0.5
KCCAKataka
0Goals scored (2nd half)0
KCCAKataka
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1
KCCAKataka
1Average goals (2nd half)1
KCCAKataka
33%Clean sheet after half-time50%
KCCAKataka
100%No goal after half-time100%
KCCAKataka

KCCA - second-half results

0% W33% D67% L
2
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime+0.7

Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Kataka - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
1
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

KCCA - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.670.33
Goals scored / game0.00.0
Goals allowed / game0.31.0
Average goals per game0.31.0
1 goal33%67%
2 goals0%33%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet67%33%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 67% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 33% draw - 67% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Kataka - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.500.50
Goals scored / game0.50.0
Goals allowed / game1.01.0
Average goals per game1.51.0
1 goal50%50%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals50%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal50%100%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

KCCA
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
2
76-90

Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Kataka
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
2
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.92
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
0%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
50%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 2 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

KCCA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.65
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.98
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.68
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
0%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
151%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Kataka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.73
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.77
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.55
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
57%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
157%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

KCCALigaKataka
Average goals per game 1.332.15 2.50
Both teams scored 0%42% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 0%42% 50%
Clean sheets 33%37% 50%
Goal before half-time 33%58% 50%
Goal after half-time 67%69% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.15
Average goals per game
42%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
1.27
Home goals / game
0.88
Away goals / game
+44%
Home attack advantage
+31%
Home defensive advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of KCCA vs Kataka?

The Uganda Premier League match finished KCCA 1:0 Kataka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KCCA vs Kataka?

KCCA score 0.00 goals per game on average and Kataka 0.50. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.15 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 0% of KCCA's matches and 50% of Kataka's.

What form are KCCA and Kataka in?

Over the last 5 games KCCA have a 0-1-2 record (0.33 points per game) and Kataka 0-1-1 (0.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KCCA vs Kataka?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KCCA vs Kataka: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.