KCCA vs Lugazi Municipal: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
KCCA vs Lugazi Municipal: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KCCA plays Lugazi Municipal in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The game is scheduled for October 28, 2026.
Recent form
KCCA has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Lugazi Municipal has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
KCCA scores 0.67 goals per game and allows 0.67. Lugazi Municipal scores 0.71 and allows 1.29. Games in this league average 2.17 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 0% of KCCA's games and 29% of Lugazi Municipal's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 43%, compared with league averages of 36% for BTTS and 40% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KCCA has the higher season xG average, 1.75 to 1.32 per game. KCCA takes 11.7 shots per game, while Lugazi Municipal takes 8.3.
First-half and second-half trends
KCCA leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Lugazi Municipal leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.71 after halftime.
When the teams score
KCCA's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (2 goals). For Lugazi Municipal, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uganda Premier League games average 2.17 goals. Both teams score in 36% of games, and 40% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Before kickoff
1X2 odds
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KCCA | Lugazi Municipal | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.14 | 0.20 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
KCCA is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - KCCA · 1.4 pts / game - Lugazi Municipal
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lugazi Municipal is 6% better for: goals scored per game.
0.67 goals / game - KCCA · 0.71 goals / game - Lugazi Municipal
KCCA is 93% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.67 goals / game - KCCA · 1.29 goals / game - Lugazi Municipal
KCCA scores in 50% of games (3 of 6 games), while Lugazi Municipal keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 games).
Lugazi Municipal scores in 57% of games (4 of 7 games), while KCCA keeps a clean sheet in 67% (4 of 6 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KCCA
Over / Under - Lugazi Municipal
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KCCA is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.17 pts / game - KCCA · 1 pts / game - Lugazi Municipal
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KCCA - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Lugazi Municipal - second-half results
Allows 1.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KCCA
Lugazi Municipal
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).
Teams vs league
| KCCA | Liga | Lugazi Municipal | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.33 | 2.17 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 36% | ▼ 29% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 0% | 40% | ▲ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 67% | 40% | ▲ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 33% | 59% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 69% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from KCCA's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Lugazi Municipal. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
When do KCCA and Lugazi Municipal play?
KCCA face Lugazi Municipal on October 28, 2026 in Uganda Premier League. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between KCCA and Lugazi Municipal?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches KCCA won 1, Lugazi Municipal won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before KCCA vs Lugazi Municipal?
KCCA score 0.67 goals per game on average and Lugazi Municipal 0.71. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 0% of KCCA's matches and 29% of Lugazi Municipal's.
What form are KCCA and Lugazi Municipal in?
Over the last 5 games KCCA have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Lugazi Municipal 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KCCA vs Lugazi Municipal?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


