KCCA vs URA: match statistics
KCCA vs URA: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KCCA played against URA in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The game was played on November 21, 2025. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
KCCA has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. URA has 1 win, 4 draws and 0 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
KCCA scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 0.83. URA scores 0.83 and allows 0.67. Games in this league average 2.24 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of KCCA's games and 50% of URA's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 17%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 41% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
URA has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.39 per game. KCCA takes 9.7 shots per game, while URA takes 10.2.
First-half and second-half trends
KCCA leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. URA leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.33 after halftime.
When the teams score
KCCA's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). For URA, it is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uganda Premier League games average 2.24 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 41% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KCCA | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.22 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
KCCA is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - KCCA · 1.4 pts / game - URA
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KCCA is 60% better for: goals scored per game.
1.33 goals / game - KCCA · 0.83 goals / game - URA
URA is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.83 goals / game - KCCA · 0.67 goals / game - URA
KCCA scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 games), while URA keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 games).
URA scores in 50% of games (3 of 6 games), while KCCA keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KCCA
Over / Under - URA
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
URA is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / game - KCCA · 1.5 pts / game - URA
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KCCA - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
URA - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 17%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KCCA
URA
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).
Teams vs league
| KCCA | Liga | URA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.17 | 2.24 | ▼ 1.50 |
| Both teams scored | • 50% | 49% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 41% | ▼ 17% |
| Clean sheets | • 33% | 33% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 57% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 67% | 51% | • 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of KCCA vs URA?
The Uganda Premier League match finished KCCA 2:1 URA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before KCCA vs URA?
KCCA score 1.33 goals per game on average and URA 0.83. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 50% of KCCA's matches and 50% of URA's.
What form are KCCA and URA in?
Over the last 5 games KCCA have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and URA 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KCCA vs URA?
The statistical background for KCCA vs URA — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.