KCCA vs Vipers: match statistics
KCCA vs Vipers: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
KCCA play Vipers in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match date is 29 April 2026 at 19:00. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
KCCA: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Vipers: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
KCCA scores 1.53 and concedes 0.73 goals per match. Vipers scores 1.90 and concedes 0.48. League average: 2.09 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: KCCA 43%, Vipers 48%. Over 2.5: KCCA 50%, Vipers 41%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.
xG, shots and style
KCCA has higher xG: 1.68 vs 1.62. KCCA: 11.8 shots per match, Vipers: 10.8.
Match halves
KCCA: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.77. Vipers: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
KCCA: 76-90+ (12 goals). Vipers: 31-45+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Uganda Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Vipers top the table with 17 wins, 7 draws and 0 losses and a goal difference of 47-12, while KCCA sit 2nd with 16 wins, 3 draws and 6 losses and a 36-19 record. KCCA at home average 1.92 goals scored and 0.67 conceded per match, with 14.08 shots and 5.58 on target on average, and an average xG of 1.85 versus xG against 1.14. Vipers away average 1.55 goals scored and 0.55 conceded, with 10.44 shots and 4.67 on target; their away xG is 1.57 versus xG against 1.29. Shot conversion is 17% for Vipers versus 14% for KCCA, and Vipers have a lower percentage of goalless games (9% vs 17%). In the last 5 matches KCCA record 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, averaging 1.4 points per game while conceding 4 goals; Vipers in their last 5 have 2 wins and 3 draws, averaging 1.8 points per game with only 1 goal conceded. Considering Vipers’ unbeaten season (0 losses), superior overall goal difference (+35 vs +17) and higher offensive efficiency, I predict a Vipers win, although KCCA’s strong home metrics (83% home wins and xG 1.85) suggest a tight, low-scoring affair.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| KCCA | Vipers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.44 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Vipers is 24% better for: goals scored per match.
1.53 goals / match - KCCA · 1.9 goals / match - Vipers
Vipers is 52% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.73 goals / match - KCCA · 0.48 goals / match - Vipers
KCCA scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while Vipers keeps a clean sheet in 52% (15 of 29 matches).
Vipers scores in 93% of matches (27 of 29 matches), while KCCA keeps a clean sheet in 40% (12 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — KCCA
Over / Under — Vipers
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Vipers is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.73 pts / match - KCCA · 1.93 pts / match - Vipers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KCCA - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Vipers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 69%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
KCCA
Vipers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).
Teams vs league
| KCCA | Liga | Vipers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.27 | 2.09 | ▲ 2.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 43% | 38% | ▲ 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 35% | ▲ 41% |
| Clean sheets | • 40% | 39% | ▲ 52% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 59% | ▲ 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 73% | 62% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: KCCA 0 - 0 - 1 Vipers. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of KCCA vs Vipers?
The Uganda Premier League match finished KCCA 1:1 Vipers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before KCCA vs Vipers?
KCCA score 1.53 goals per game on average and Vipers 1.90. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 43% of KCCA's matches and 48% of Vipers's.
What form are KCCA and Vipers in?
Over the last 5 games KCCA have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Vipers 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KCCA vs Vipers?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KCCA vs Vipers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.