Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Kedus Giorgis vs Mebrat Hayl: match statistics

Kedus Giorgis crest
Kedus Giorgis
2 : 1half-time 0:1
Mebrat Hayl crest
Mebrat Hayl

Kedus Giorgis vs Mebrat Hayl: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kedus Giorgis play Mebrat Hayl in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 8 April 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Kedus Giorgis: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Mebrat Hayl: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kedus Giorgis scores 0.89 and concedes 0.84 goals per match. Mebrat Hayl scores 0.84 and concedes 0.68. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kedus Giorgis 32%, Mebrat Hayl 37%. Over 2.5: Kedus Giorgis 24%, Mebrat Hayl 26%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Kedus Giorgis has higher xG: 1.22 vs 1.12. Kedus Giorgis: 8.0 shots per match, Mebrat Hayl: 7.0.

Match halves

Kedus Giorgis: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.35. Mebrat Hayl: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Kedus Giorgis: 31-45+ (9 goals). Mebrat Hayl: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Mebrat Hayl sit 4th in the table while Kedus Giorgis are 17th. In the last 5 matches the visitors have scored 8 goals and averaged 2.0 points per game, whereas the hosts have managed only 2 goals and 0.8 points per game. Defensively Kedus concede on average 0.64 goals per home match and keep 45% clean sheets, but in their last five fixtures the hosts have conceded as many as 7 goals, while Mebrat have conceded only 3. Kedus nevertheless create slightly better chances at home: average xG 1.33 per match, 8.82 shots and 2.55 shots on target, versus Mebrat’s xG 1.18, 7.33 shots and 2.08 shots on target, with comparable conversion rates of 9% versus 10%. The visitors show better form and efficiency recently (3 wins and 1 draw in the last 5) and a higher league position, which together with the recent goal balance (8 vs 2) gives them a clear advantage. Taking into account the form advantage, goals scored in the last 5 matches and league position, I forecast an away win, although the hosts’ higher xG and superior defensive organisation at home reduce the likelihood of a loss to a possible draw or narrow defeat.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
10Shots8
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
4Shots on target2
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
1.43xG1.22
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
1Corners2
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
71Dangerous attacks79
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
-1Fouls-1
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
-1Cards-1
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
0.89Goals scored / match0.84
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
0.84Goals conceded / match0.68
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
48%Average possession53%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
2.97Shots on target / match2.21
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.95Shots per match7
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
2.97Shots on target2.21
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
11.2%Shot conversion12%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
48%Possession53%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
1.22xG for1.12
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
1.05xG against1.16
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl

Shooting quality

Kedus Giorgis: BalancedMebrat Hayl: Balanced
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
Accuracy (shots on target)37%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kedus Giorgis is 63% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Kedus Giorgis · 1.6 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl

Kedus Giorgis
WWWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
38% W30% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-11-12
1.43 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-6-4
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 0.95Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Mebrat Hayl
LDWDW
Season result split
34% W39% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-15-10
1.42 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-5-8
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kedus Giorgis is 6% better for: goals scored per match.

0.89 goals / match - Kedus Giorgis · 0.84 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl

Mebrat Hayl is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.84 goals / match - Kedus Giorgis · 0.68 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl

Kedus Giorgis scoring profile: mixed

Kedus Giorgis scores in 59% of matches (22 of 37 matches), while Mebrat Hayl keeps a clean sheet in 47% (18 of 38 matches).

Mebrat Hayl scoring profile: mixed

Mebrat Hayl scores in 55% of matches (21 of 38 matches), while Kedus Giorgis keeps a clean sheet in 38% (14 of 37 matches).

33Goals scored (season)32
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
31Goals conceded (season)26
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
1.73Average goals in match1.53
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
8Goals scored (last 5)5
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
2Goals conceded (last 5)4
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal55%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
19%2 goals18%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
8%3 goals8%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
3%4 goals3%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal53%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
16%2 goals16%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
5%3 goals0%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
0%4 goals0%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time5%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
8%Scored in both halves11%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl

BTTS and goal count

16%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
40%BTTS - last 560%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time39%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl

2nd half

59%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
22%Min. 2 goals after half-time26%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kedus Giorgis is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.46 pts / match - Kedus Giorgis · 1.29 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl

Kedus Giorgis - half-time state
32% leading49% draw19% trailing
Mebrat Hayl - half-time state
21% leading66% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.46Points per match (1st half)1.29
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
0.54Goals scored (1st half)0.34
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.21
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
0.92Average goals (1st half)0.55
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
65%Clean sheet before half-time82%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
59%No goal before half-time74%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl

After half-time (2nd half)

1.16Points per match (2nd half)1.29
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
0.35Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
0.46Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
0.81Average goals (2nd half)0.97
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
65%Clean sheet after half-time61%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl
73%No goal after half-time61%
Kedus GiorgisMebrat Hayl

Kedus Giorgis - second-half results

24% W43% R32% P
54
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.46
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mebrat Hayl - second-half results

26% W50% R24% P
49
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding162%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kedus Giorgis - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.40
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match1.60.4
1 goal100%20%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal0%80%
Goal difference+4+2
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
Mebrat Hayl - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kedus Giorgis
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
7
4
16-30
9
8
31-45
2
9
46-60
3
4
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Mebrat Hayl
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
4
2
16-30
5
2
31-45
9
4
46-60
5
7
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.63
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
35%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-39%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
32%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kedus Giorgis

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Mebrat Hayl

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Kedus GiorgisLigaMebrat Hayl
Average goals in match 1.731.78 1.53
Both teams scored 32%40% 37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 24%28% 26%
Clean sheets 38%40% 47%
Goal before half-time 59%56% 39%
Goal after half-time 59%59% 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Kedus Giorgis 0 - 0 - 1 Mebrat Hayl. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Kedus Giorgis vs Mebrat Hayl?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Kedus Giorgis 2:1 Mebrat Hayl. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kedus Giorgis vs Mebrat Hayl?

Kedus Giorgis score 0.89 goals per game on average and Mebrat Hayl 0.84. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 32% of Kedus Giorgis's matches and 37% of Mebrat Hayl's.

What form are Kedus Giorgis and Mebrat Hayl in?

Over the last 5 games Kedus Giorgis have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Mebrat Hayl 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kedus Giorgis vs Mebrat Hayl?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.