Kendal Tornado vs PSS Sleman: match statistics
Kendal Tornado vs PSS Sleman: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kendal Tornado play PSS Sleman in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The match date is 29 March 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Kendal Tornado: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. PSS Sleman: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kendal Tornado scores 1.82 and concedes 0.59 goals per match. PSS Sleman scores 2.00 and concedes 0.75. League average: 2.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kendal Tornado 29%, PSS Sleman 61%. Over 2.5: Kendal Tornado 53%, PSS Sleman 57%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Kendal Tornado has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.32. Kendal Tornado: 9.2 shots per match, PSS Sleman: 10.2.
Match halves
Kendal Tornado: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 1.24. PSS Sleman: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 1.25.
Goals by minute
Kendal Tornado: 61-75 (9 goals). PSS Sleman: 46-60 (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga 2: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Kendal Tornado show strong home form: 0 defeats, 67% wins, only 0.33 GA per match and 67% CS, indicating exceptional defense. PSS Sleman lead the league with an impressive goal tally (39) and consistent away scoring (avg 1.9), but their away xG (1.19) is lower than Kendal’s home xG (1.58). Both teams have similar possession (53%) and identical last-5 PPG (2.2), suggesting a balanced match. Due to the hosts’ flawless home run and outstanding defensive form I give them a slight edge. Nevertheless PSS’s offensive capability makes a draw or narrow away win realistic scenarios.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kendal Tornado | PSS Sleman | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 60% | 47% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kendal Tornado is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Kendal Tornado · 1.6 pts / match - PSS Sleman
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
PSS Sleman is 10% better for: goals scored per match.
1.82 goals / match - Kendal Tornado · 2 goals / match - PSS Sleman
Kendal Tornado is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.59 goals / match - Kendal Tornado · 0.75 goals / match - PSS Sleman
Kendal Tornado scores in 65% of matches (11 of 17 matches), while PSS Sleman keeps a clean sheet in 36% (10 of 28 matches).
PSS Sleman scores in 89% of matches (25 of 28 matches), while Kendal Tornado keeps a clean sheet in 53% (9 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Kendal Tornado
Over / Under — PSS Sleman
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kendal Tornado is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.94 pts / match - Kendal Tornado · 1.71 pts / match - PSS Sleman
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kendal Tornado - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
PSS Sleman - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (14 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kendal Tornado
PSS Sleman
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).
Teams vs league
| Kendal Tornado | Liga | PSS Sleman | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.41 | 2.79 | • 2.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 29% | 51% | ▲ 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 49% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 53% | 28% | ▲ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 47% | 70% | • 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 79% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Kendal Tornado 1 - 0 - 0 PSS Sleman. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Kendal Tornado vs PSS Sleman?
The Liga 2 match finished Kendal Tornado 1:1 PSS Sleman. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kendal Tornado vs PSS Sleman?
Kendal Tornado score 1.82 goals per game on average and PSS Sleman 2.00. The Liga 2 average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 29% of Kendal Tornado's matches and 61% of PSS Sleman's.
What form are Kendal Tornado and PSS Sleman in?
Over the last 5 games Kendal Tornado have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and PSS Sleman 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kendal Tornado vs PSS Sleman?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kendal Tornado vs PSS Sleman: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.