Norway - EliteserienKFUM ArenaData current as of November 02, 2026

KFUM vs HamKam: match statistics

KFUM crest
KFUM
2 : 2half-time 1:0
HamKam crest
HamKam

KFUM vs HamKam: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

KFUM played against HamKam in Eliteserien (Norway). The game was played on November 1, 2026. Venue: KFUM Arena. Final score: 2:2.

Recent form

KFUM has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. HamKam has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

KFUM scores 1.25 goals per game and allows 1.63. HamKam scores 1.38 and allows 2.13. Games in this league average 3.25 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 63% of KFUM's games and 58% of HamKam's. The Over 2.5 rates are 58% and 75%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

HamKam has the higher season xG average, 1.24 to 1.23 per game. KFUM takes 10.5 shots per game, while HamKam takes 10.8.

First-half and second-half trends

KFUM leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. HamKam leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.96 after halftime.

When the teams score

KFUM's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (7 goals). For HamKam, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Eliteserien games average 3.25 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 3 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KFUM enter the match on the back of three wins and two draws in their last five games, while HamKam have won two and lost three. The hosts scored 10 goals and conceded 5 during that spell, compared with 8 scored and 10 conceded by the visitors, pointing to greater consistency from KFUM. Particularly significant is the defensive gap in the teams’ respective home and away settings: KFUM concede an average of 1.17 goals at home, while HamKam concede as many as 2.25 on the road. The visitors have lost 58% of their away matches and kept a clean sheet in just 8%, although their average of 1.33 goals scored away from home gives them a chance of finding the net. With attacking xG almost identical — 1.19 for KFUM at home and 1.18 for HamKam away — the pick of the hosts is driven primarily by their current form and stronger defensive record.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have scored in 58% of their matches, providing a solid basis for BTTS - Yes. KFUM average 1.42 goals at home, while HamKam concede 2.25 goals away, making a home goal likely. The visitors average 1.33 goals away, while KFUM concede 2.00 at home; the hosts’ xG conceded is also 1.79, pointing to chances for HamKam. In their last five matches, both teams scored in 80% of KFUM’s games, but in only 40% of HamKam’s, and HamKam failed to score in 33% of their away matches. Therefore, the case for BTTS - Yes is not particularly strong.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

At least two goals were scored in 92% of matches involving these teams, making Over 1.5 the strongest signal in the data. KFUM score an average of 1.42 goals per match, while HamKam concede 2.25; meanwhile, the visitors score 1.33 goals, and the hosts concede 2.00. The percentages of matches with at least three goals also point to an open game: 67% for KFUM and 83% for HamKam, although this line is less certain. In their last five matches, KFUM averaged 2.0 goals scored, while HamKam averaged 2.0 goals conceded, further supporting the Over 1.5 pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is KFUM leading at the break and holding that advantage through to the final whistle: HamKam were trailing at half-time in 58% of their matches, while KFUM were ahead in 33%. The visitors concede an average of 1.08 goals before half-time, compared with 0.67 for the hosts, pointing to an early KFUM advantage. The hosts’ recent form also supports a home win: they have won three of their last five matches and have not lost any, while HamKam have suffered three defeats. Over this period, KFUM scored an average of 2.0 goals per match compared with HamKam’s 1.6, and scored 1.2 goals after the break, while the visitors conceded 1.2. A half-time draw remains a significant alternative, as HamKam went into the break level in three of their last five matches.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
1 : 2
Second half

Game stats

48Possession (%)52
KFUMHamKam
12Shots13
KFUMHamKam
5Shots on target2
KFUMHamKam
1.45xG1.47
KFUMHamKam
3Corners6
KFUMHamKam
47Dangerous attacks69
KFUMHamKam
6Fouls12
KFUMHamKam
1Cards3
KFUMHamKam

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.25Goals scored / game1.38
KFUMHamKam
1.63Goals allowed / game2.13
KFUMHamKam
44%Average possession45%
KFUMHamKam
3.96Shots on target / game3.83
KFUMHamKam

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.54Shots per game10.75
KFUMHamKam
3.96Shots on target3.83
KFUMHamKam
11.9%Shot conversion12.8%
KFUMHamKam
44%Possession45%
KFUMHamKam
1.23xG for1.24
KFUMHamKam
1.74xG against1.9
KFUMHamKam

Shooting quality

KFUM: BalancedHamKam: Counter-attacking
KFUMHamKam
Accuracy (shots on target)38%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

KFUM is 267% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / game - KFUM · 0.6 pts / game - HamKam

KFUM
WWWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
33% W25% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-6-10
1.25 pts / game · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-4
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 2.13BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
HamKam
LLWLL
Season result split
29% W21% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-5-12
1.08 pts / game · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-7
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLLLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 2.16BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

HamKam is 10% better for: goals scored per game.

1.25 goals / game - KFUM · 1.38 goals / game - HamKam

KFUM is 31% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.63 goals / game - KFUM · 2.13 goals / game - HamKam

KFUM scoring profile: very strong

KFUM scores in 79% of games (19 of 24 games), while HamKam keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 24 games).

HamKam scoring profile: very strong

HamKam scores in 75% of games (18 of 24 games), while KFUM keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 games).

30Goals scored (season)33
KFUMHamKam
39Goals conceded (season)51
KFUMHamKam
2.88Average goals per game3.5
KFUMHamKam
10Goals scored (last 5)7
KFUMHamKam
6Goals conceded (last 5)15
KFUMHamKam

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal75%
KFUMHamKam
42%2 goals42%
KFUMHamKam
4%3 goals13%
KFUMHamKam
0%4 goals8%
KFUMHamKam

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal83%
KFUMHamKam
54%2 goals63%
KFUMHamKam
17%3 goals38%
KFUMHamKam
13%4 goals21%
KFUMHamKam

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

42%BTTS at half-time17%
KFUMHamKam
13%BTTS in both halves13%
KFUMHamKam
21%Scored in both halves25%
KFUMHamKam

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
KFUMHamKam
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
KFUMHamKam
100%BTTS - last 560%
KFUMHamKam

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
KFUMHamKam
63%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
KFUMHamKam
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
KFUMHamKam

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
KFUMHamKam
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time71%
KFUMHamKam
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time42%
KFUMHamKam

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KFUM is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / game - KFUM · 0.92 pts / game - HamKam

KFUM - half-time state
25% leading38% draw38% trailing
HamKam - half-time state
21% leading29% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per game (1st half)0.92
KFUMHamKam
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.42
KFUMHamKam
0.96Goals conceded (1st half)0.88
KFUMHamKam
1.71Average goals (1st half)1.29
KFUMHamKam
33%Clean sheet before half-time33%
KFUMHamKam
42%No goal before half-time67%
KFUMHamKam

After half-time (2nd half)

1.08Points per game (2nd half)1.33
KFUMHamKam
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.96
KFUMHamKam
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)1.25
KFUMHamKam
1.17Average goals (2nd half)2.21
KFUMHamKam
50%Clean sheet after half-time38%
KFUMHamKam
58%No goal after half-time33%
KFUMHamKam

KFUM - second-half results

21% W46% D33% L
27
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

HamKam - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
22
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.92
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

KFUM - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.20
Goals scored / game1.01.0
Goals allowed / game1.00.2
Average goals per game2.01.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5
HamKam - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.600.80
Goals scored / game0.41.0
Goals allowed / game1.02.0
Average goals per game1.43.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals0%80%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

KFUM
ScoredConceded
5
7
0-15
7
7
16-30
6
9
31-45
5
5
46-60
6
2
61-75
1
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

HamKam
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
2
5
16-30
7
11
31-45
8
14
46-60
5
6
61-75
10
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.19
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-25%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

KFUM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.95
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
3% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
3%

HamKam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.66
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eliteserien).

Teams vs league

KFUMLigaHamKam
Average goals per game▼ 2.883.25▲ 3.50
Both teams scored▲ 63%60%▼ 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 58%63%▲ 75%
Clean sheets• 21%21%▼ 17%
Goal before half-time▼ 83%85%▼ 83%
Goal after half-time▼ 71%80%▲ 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.25
Average goals per game
60%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.85
Home goals / game
1.40
Away goals / game
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defensive advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KFUMYellow cardBrage Skaret
  2. HamKamSubstitutionOn: Henrik UdahlOff: Loris Mettler
  3. HamKamSubstitutionOn: Danilo Al-SaedOff: David Benjamin
  4. HamKamSubstitutionOn: Snorre Strand NilsenOff: Vidar Ari Jonsson
  5. HamKamYellow cardAksel Baran Potur
  6. HamKamYellow cardEthan Amundsen-Day
  7. HamKamSubstitutionOn: Halvor Rødølen OpsahlOff: Fredrik Sjølstad

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from KFUM's perspective: 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss against HamKam. Games average 2.40 goals, and both teams scored in 40% of them.

HamKam
4 : 0
KFUM
KFUM Fotball
2 : 2
Hamarkameratene Fotball
Hamarkameratene Fotball
0 : 0
KFUM Fotball
HamKam
0 : 2
KFUM
KFUM
1 : 1
HamKam

FAQ

What was the result of KFUM vs HamKam?

The Eliteserien match finished KFUM 2:2 HamKam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KFUM and HamKam?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches KFUM won 1, HamKam won 1 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KFUM vs HamKam?

KFUM score 1.25 goals per game on average and HamKam 1.38. The Eliteserien average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 63% of KFUM's matches and 58% of HamKam's.

What form are KFUM and HamKam in?

Over the last 5 games KFUM have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and HamKam 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KFUM vs HamKam?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.