Norway - EliteserienData current as of 21 July 2026

KFUM vs Start: match statistics

KFUM crest
KFUM
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Start crest
Start
125%(1.92)
X30%(3.45)
245%(3.40)

Start is clearly showing better form over their last five matches, earning 11 points (3 wins, 2 draws) with an average of 2.2 points per game, while KFUM managed only 4 points (1 win, 1 draw, 3 losses) averaging 0.8 points per game. Start's form (dwdww) indicates an unbeaten streak, contrasting with the hosts' problematic run (ldllw). The goal difference also favors the visitors - Start scored 9 goals and conceded only 4 in their last five games, whereas KFUM scored 5 and conceded a massive 10. Additionally, KFUM's higher table position (6th place) may be misleading, as a lack of detailed home data suggests the beginning of the season or a break, making recent form the key indicator. Start's advantage in form and offensive efficiency, combined with the hosts' defensive issues, points to a probable away victory.

KFUM vs Start: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KFUM play Start in Eliteserien (Norway). The match date is 15 March 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

KFUM: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Start: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

KFUM scores 1.00 and concedes 1.62 goals per match. Start scores 1.00 and concedes 2.36. League average: 2.95 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KFUM 46%, Start 71%. Over 2.5: KFUM 54%, Start 57%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

Start has higher xG: 1.29 vs 1.26. KFUM: 10.6 shots per match, Start: 11.6.

Match halves

KFUM: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.38. Start: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.36.

Goals by minute

KFUM: 0-15 (3 goals). Start: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Eliteserien: 2.95 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Start is clearly showing better form over their last five matches, earning 11 points (3 wins, 2 draws) with an average of 2.2 points per game, while KFUM managed only 4 points (1 win, 1 draw, 3 losses) averaging 0.8 points per game. Start's form (dwdww) indicates an unbeaten streak, contrasting with the hosts' problematic run (ldllw). The goal difference also favors the visitors - Start scored 9 goals and conceded only 4 in their last five games, whereas KFUM scored 5 and conceded a massive 10. Additionally, KFUM's higher table position (6th place) may be misleading, as a lack of detailed home data suggests the beginning of the season or a break, making recent form the key indicator. Start's advantage in form and offensive efficiency, combined with the hosts' defensive issues, points to a probable away victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
KFUMStart
15Shots5
KFUMStart
6Shots on target2
KFUMStart
1.77xG0.77
KFUMStart
4Corners2
KFUMStart
55Dangerous attacks42
KFUMStart
9Fouls11
KFUMStart
1Cards2
KFUMStart

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match1
KFUMStart
1.62Goals conceded / match2.36
KFUMStart
47%Average possession40%
KFUMStart
4.15Shots on target / match3.5
KFUMStart

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.62Shots per match11.64
KFUMStart
4.15Shots on target3.5
KFUMStart
9.4%Shot conversion8.6%
KFUMStart
47%Possession40%
KFUMStart
1.26xG for1.29
KFUMStart
1.49xG against1.74
KFUMStart

Shooting quality

KFUM: BalancedStart: Balanced
KFUMStart
Accuracy (shots on target)39%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KFUM is 33% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - KFUM · 0.6 pts / match - Start

KFUM
LWDLL
Season result split
23% W23% R54% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-7
0.92 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Start
LWLLL
Season result split
7% W29% R64% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-4-9
0.50 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-7
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.82BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KFUM is 46% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.62 goals / match - KFUM · 2.36 goals / match - Start

KFUM scoring profile: very strong

KFUM scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while Start keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).

Start scoring profile: very strong

Start scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while KFUM keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).

13Goals scored (season)14
KFUMStart
21Goals conceded (season)33
KFUMStart
2.62Average goals in match3.36
KFUMStart
4Goals scored (last 5)5
KFUMStart
6Goals conceded (last 5)11
KFUMStart

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal79%
KFUMStart
31%2 goals14%
KFUMStart
0%3 goals7%
KFUMStart
0%4 goals0%
KFUMStart

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal93%
KFUMStart
69%2 goals64%
KFUMStart
15%3 goals36%
KFUMStart
8%4 goals21%
KFUMStart

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

38%BTTS at half-time21%
KFUMStart
15%BTTS in both halves0%
KFUMStart
15%Scored in both halves0%
KFUMStart

BTTS and goal count

46%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
KFUMStart
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
KFUMStart
40%BTTS - last 560%
KFUMStart

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
KFUMStart
62%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
KFUMStart
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
KFUMStart

2nd half

62%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
KFUMStart
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time64%
KFUMStart
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
KFUMStart

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Start is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.85 pts / match - KFUM · 1.14 pts / match - Start

KFUM - half-time state
15% leading38% draw46% trailing
Start - half-time state
29% leading29% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.85Points per match (1st half)1.14
KFUMStart
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.64
KFUMStart
1.08Goals conceded (1st half)0.79
KFUMStart
1.69Average goals (1st half)1.43
KFUMStart
31%Clean sheet before half-time43%
KFUMStart
46%No goal before half-time57%
KFUMStart

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)0.64
KFUMStart
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)0.36
KFUMStart
0.54Goals conceded (2nd half)1.57
KFUMStart
0.92Average goals (2nd half)1.93
KFUMStart
54%Clean sheet after half-time29%
KFUMStart
69%No goal after half-time64%
KFUMStart

KFUM - second-half results

15% W54% R31% P
11
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Start - second-half results

14% W21% R64% P
16
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding24%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 7%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KFUM - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.40.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Start - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.20
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.6
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-7
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KFUM
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
3
5
16-30
2
4
31-45
3
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
0
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Start
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
1
4
16-30
5
6
31-45
3
4
46-60
1
8
61-75
1
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.99
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KFUM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
56%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
140%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Start

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.91
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
132%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eliteserien).

Teams vs league

KFUMLigaStart
Average goals in match 2.622.95 3.36
Both teams scored 46%55% 71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 54%57% 57%
Clean sheets 31%24% 7%
Goal before half-time 85%82% 79%
Goal after half-time 62%78% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.95
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.79
Home goals / match
1.16
Away goals / match
+54%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defence advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of KFUM vs Start?

The Eliteserien match finished KFUM 2:0 Start. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KFUM vs Start?

KFUM score 1.00 goals per game on average and Start 1.00. The Eliteserien average is 2.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 46% of KFUM's matches and 71% of Start's.

What form are KFUM and Start in?

Over the last 5 games KFUM have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Start 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KFUM vs Start?

The statistical background for KFUM vs Start — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.