KFUM vs Vålerenga: match statistics
KFUM vs Vålerenga: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KFUM played against Vålerenga in Eliteserien (Norway). The game was played on October 12, 2026. Venue: KFUM Arena. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
KFUM has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Vålerenga has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
KFUM scores 1.19 goals per game and allows 1.67. Vålerenga scores 1.62 and allows 2.05. Games in this league average 3.18 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 57% of KFUM's games and 57% of Vålerenga's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 57%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Vålerenga has the higher season xG average, 1.79 to 1.22 per game. KFUM takes 10.4 shots per game, while Vålerenga takes 16.3.
First-half and second-half trends
KFUM leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.38 goals per game after halftime. Vålerenga leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.76 after halftime.
When the teams score
KFUM's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (7 goals). For Vålerenga, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Eliteserien games average 3.18 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
KFUM have won 3 of their last 5 matches, while Vålerenga have won just once, which points to the hosts despite their narrow advantage in the table: 10th place compared with 12th. The visitors create more chances away from home—their average xG is 1.79, compared with KFUM’s 1.17 at home—but they have failed to score in 40% of their away matches. The key difference lies in defense: Vålerenga concede an average of 2.4 goals away from home and keep a clean sheet in just 10% of matches, whereas KFUM concede an average of 1.18 goals at home. The hosts have won 45% of their home matches, while the visitors have won 20% of their away games, making a KFUM victory the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS occurred in 64% of KFUM matches and 50% of Vålerenga matches, rising to 60% and 80% respectively in their last 5 games, strengthening the case for goals at both ends. KFUM average 1.82 goals at home, while Vålerenga concede 2.4 goals away, making a home goal look likely. The visitors average 1.4 goals away, and KFUM concede 1.73 at home; both teams also average 1.79 xG. The main obstacle to BTTS - Yes is that Vålerenga have failed to score in 40% of their away matches, although they have averaged 2 goals across their last 5 games. Both teams' attacking output and low clean-sheet rates—9% for KFUM and 10% for Vålerenga—support BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
KFUM score an average of 1.82 goals per match, while Vålerenga concede 2.40, pointing to strong scoring potential for the hosts. The visitors can also get on the scoresheet: their average xG is 1.79, while KFUM allow opponents chances worth an average of 1.71 xG. The last 5 matches for both teams produced an average of 3.6 goals, although Vålerenga's finishing can be inconsistent—they failed to score in 40% of their matches. The strongest signal is therefore for Over 1.5 goals: this line has been cleared in 82% of KFUM matches and 90% of Vålerenga matches, significantly more often than the Over 2.5 line, at 64% and 50%, respectively.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is KFUM leading at the break and winning the match: the hosts were ahead at half-time in 3 of their last 5 games, while Vålerenga were trailing at that stage in 3 of 5. Over the season as a whole, the visitors have conceded an average of 1.3 goals before half-time, while KFUM have scored an average of 1.0 goals in first halves. The full-match record also supports them holding on to their lead: KFUM score an average of 1.82 goals, while Vålerenga concede 2.4 per game; in their last 5 matches, the hosts have won 3 times and the visitors just once. The main risk to the 1/1 pick is Vålerenga’s improved play after the break: they have scored an average of 1.2 goals in the second half across their last 5 matches, compared with 0.4 for KFUM. Even so, the hosts’ clearer advantage in first halves and the visitors’ weaker season-long defensive record make 1/1 the most likely single outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KFUM | Vålerenga | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
KFUM is 133% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - KFUM · 0.6 pts / game - Vålerenga
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Vålerenga is 36% better for: goals scored per game.
1.19 goals / game - KFUM · 1.62 goals / game - Vålerenga
KFUM is 23% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.67 goals / game - KFUM · 2.05 goals / game - Vålerenga
KFUM scores in 76% of games (16 of 21 games), while Vålerenga keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 21 games).
Vålerenga scores in 67% of games (14 of 21 games), while KFUM keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KFUM
Over / Under - Vålerenga
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KFUM is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.19 pts / game - KFUM · 1 pts / game - Vålerenga
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KFUM - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Vålerenga - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 2.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KFUM
Vålerenga
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eliteserien).
Teams vs league
| KFUM | Liga | Vålerenga | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.86 | 3.18 | ▲ 3.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 57% | 59% | ▼ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 57% | 62% | ▼ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 24% | 22% | ▼ 10% |
| Goal before half-time | • 86% | 85% | • 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 79% | ▼ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from KFUM's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss against Vålerenga. Games average 2.33 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of KFUM vs Vålerenga?
The Eliteserien match finished KFUM 2:1 Vålerenga. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between KFUM and Vålerenga?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches KFUM won 0, Vålerenga won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before KFUM vs Vålerenga?
KFUM score 1.19 goals per game on average and Vålerenga 1.62. The Eliteserien average is 3.18 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 57% of KFUM's matches and 57% of Vålerenga's.
What form are KFUM and Vålerenga in?
Over the last 5 games KFUM have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Vålerenga 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KFUM vs Vålerenga?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KFUM vs Vålerenga: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.