KÍ vs B68: match statistics
KÍ vs B68: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KÍ played against B68 in Faroe Islands Premier League (Faroe Islands). The game was played on April 11, 2026. Final score: 6:1.
Recent form
KÍ has 2 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. B68 has 1 win, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 0.75 points per game.
Scoring records
KÍ scores 1.75 goals per game and allows 0.50. B68 scores 0.75 and allows 2.75. Games in this league average 2.43 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of KÍ's games and 50% of B68's. The Over 2.5 rates are 25% and 75%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KÍ has the higher season xG average, 1.63 to 1.35 per game. KÍ takes 11.5 shots per game, while B68 takes 10.3.
First-half and second-half trends
KÍ leads at halftime in 75% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. B68 leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
KÍ's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). For B68, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Faroe Islands Premier League games average 2.43 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back a KÍ win because the hosts display a significantly superior defense: KÍ concedes on average 0.5 goals at home and has 50% clean sheets, whereas B68 concedes on average 4.0 goals away and has not recorded a single clean sheet. Additionally, B68 have yet to score on the road (0.0 goals average, away shutout rate 100%), while KÍ average 1.0 goals at home with an 18% conversion rate and 5.5 shots per game. xG metrics show B68 generate 1.45 xG away while conceding 1.68 xG, indicating vulnerability to high-quality chances, whereas KÍ register 0.79 xG at home and concede 1.00 xG, suggesting the hosts have been more efficient in converting the chances available. In the last 5 matches KÍ scored 8 goals and have a 3-0-2 record, averaging 2.2 points per game, while B68 in their last 5 matches have only one win, three losses and averaged 0.8 points per game while conceding 12 goals. Based on this I estimate probabilities of 80% for the hosts, 15% for a draw and 5% for an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I pick BTTS - No. Main reason is the visitors’ poor attacking output: only 3 goals this season (0.0 per match) and 4 goals in the last 5 fixtures (0.8 per match). The home side display strong form both offensively and defensively: 8 goals in their last 5 matches (1.6 per match) and only 2 conceded (0.4 per match), with recent xG of 1.71 (xG created) versus 0.93 (xG allowed). Although the homes’ season BTTS rate is 100%, the visitors’ overall record remains weak — they concede an average of 4.0 goals per match this season (11 conceded). In the last 5 matches visitors generate 1.49 xG with xG against 1.84, but their shot conversion rate is 0% compared to the hosts’ 17%, limiting their ability to turn chances into goals. Considering the visitors’ 0.8 average goals in the last 5 and the hosts’ just 0.4 conceded in the same period, I assess BTTS No at 65% versus 35% for Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Model xG projects 1.46 for KÍ (attacking xG 1.24 vs B68 defensive xG 1.68) and 1.72 for B68 (attacking xG 1.45 vs KÍ defensive xG 1.99), totaling 3.18 expected goals. That is above the league average of 2.55 goals/match and Poisson estimates translate to roughly an 83% chance of Over 1.5 and ~62% for Over 2.5. In their last 5 matches KÍ scored 8 goals (1.6 avg) while B68 conceded 12 goals (2.4 avg), reinforcing the likelihood of a goal-rich game. Season stats show both teams have 100% of matches over 1.5 goals, with KÍ at 100% of matches >2.5 and an average of 4.5 on-target shots per team. Therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal — the high expected total of 3.18 goals and an 83% probability provide the best value.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
KÍ has a clear efficiency advantage: on the season they average 1.5 goals per game and 0.5 goals by half-time, while B68 have 0.0 goals for the season and 0.0 by half-time; additionally B68 concede on average 4.0 goals per game and 1.5 before the break. In the last 5 matches KÍ has averaged 1.6 goals scored and 0.4 conceded, recorded 60% wins and led at the break in 60% of cases, whereas B68 over the same period have 0.8 goals scored and 2.4 conceded and only 20% leads at the break. Although xG is 1.24 for KÍ versus 1.45 for B68, the home side convert better (shot conversion rate 17% versus 0% for the visitors) and average 9 shots per match with 4.5 on target, while the visitors have 11.5 shots and also 4.5 on target, which suggests wasted chances by B68. Minute-by-minute stats show KÍ can threaten early (1 goal in minutes 0–15), while B68 concede particularly in minutes 31–45 (2 goals) and 76–90 (3 goals), supporting a half-time lead for the hosts and maintenance of the result. Therefore the most likely HT/FT scenario is 1/1 (44%), other realistic options are X/1 (17%) and X/X (12%), hence my pick is 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KÍ | B68 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 50% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.17 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
KÍ is 167% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - KÍ · 0.75 pts / game - B68
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KÍ is 133% better for: goals scored per game.
1.75 goals / game - KÍ · 0.75 goals / game - B68
KÍ is 450% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.5 goals / game - KÍ · 2.75 goals / game - B68
KÍ scores in 75% of games (3 of 4 meczów), while B68 keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 meczów).
B68 scores in 50% of games (2 of 4 meczów), while KÍ keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KÍ
Over / Under - B68
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KÍ is 233% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.5 pts / game - KÍ · 0.75 pts / game - B68
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KÍ - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 75% of games and wins 50%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
B68 - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.50 | 1.25 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.5 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 25% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 50% |
| No goal | 25% | 75% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.75 | 0.50 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.3 | 0.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.3 | 2.3 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 75% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 25% | 0% |
| No goal | 75% | 50% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KÍ
B68
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Faroe Islands Premier League).
Teams vs league
| KÍ | Liga | B68 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.25 | 2.43 | ▲ 3.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 48% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 25% | 52% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 33% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 67% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 76% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from KÍ's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against B68. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of KÍ vs B68?
The Faroe Islands Premier League match finished KÍ 6:1 B68. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between KÍ and B68?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches KÍ won 2, B68 won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before KÍ vs B68?
KÍ score 1.75 goals per game on average and B68 0.75. The Faroe Islands Premier League average is 2.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 50% of KÍ's matches and 50% of B68's.
What form are KÍ and B68 in?
Over the last 5 games KÍ have a 2-2-0 record (2.00 points per game) and B68 1-0-3 (0.75 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KÍ vs B68?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


